Abstract
Phase contrast MRI is an emerging tool for evaluating valvular pathology. However, the effects of variable image position and valvular pathology on velocity measurements have not been explored. We compare velocity maps with correlation methods, used in image processing to align images and quantify their similarity, to define these effects on calculations of valve orifice area. Quantitative flow images were acquired in four parallel planes (2 in aortic root, 2 in outflow tract), in patients (n = 22) with aortic stenosis. Velocity–time integrals (VTIs) were computed and cross-correlations were performed to quantitatively compare the shapes and relative positions of three-dimensional flow profiles between scans at various positions. Supravalvular VTIs correlated well with one another (R = 0.96), with comparable values. The two subvalvular VTIs exhibited a linear relationship (R = 0.93) but with a 23% difference in mean values. Cross-correlations between supravalvular levels were maximized at (0, 0) offset (indicating concentrically aligned jets) for 19/23 patients, with an average maximum value of 0.957 ± 0.028; the average for the remainder was 0.800 ± 0.037. For subvalvular levels, all cross-correlations were maximized at (0, 0) with average maximum 0.968 ± 0.160. The aortic VTI measurements were comparable, indicating relative insensitivity to the position of the imaging plane; in the LVOT, measurements were only somewhat position-dependent. We conclude that phase contrast MRI is a robust tool for the evaluation of aortic stenosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caputo, G., C. Kondo, and C. Higgins. Magnetic resonance angiography and blood flow quantification. Am. J. Card. Imaging 7:233–242, 1993.
Caruthers, S. D., S. J. Lin, P. Brown, M. P. Watkins, T. A. Williams, K. A. Lehr, and S. A. Wickline. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: Comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 108:2236–2243, 2003.
Chatzimavroudis, G. P., J. N. Oshinski, R. H. Franch, P. G. Walker, A. P. Yoganathan, and R. I. Pettigrew. Evaluation of the precision of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping for blood flow measurements. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 3:11–19, 2001.
Friedrich, M. G., J. Schulz-Menger, T. Poetsch, B. Pilz, F. Uhlich, and R. Dietz. Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am. Heart J. 144:329–334, 2002.
John, A. S., T. Dill, R. R. Brandt, M. Rau, W. Ricken, G. Bachmann, and C. W. Hamm. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis—how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 42:519–526, 2003.
Kilner, P. J., D. N. Firmin, R. S. Rees, J. Martinez, D. J. Pennell, R. H. Mohiaddin, S. R. Underwood, and D. B. Longmore. Valve and great vessel stenosis: Assessment with MR jet velocity mapping. Radiology. 178:229–235, 1991.
Kupfahl, C., M. Honold, G. Meinhardt, H. Vogelsberg, A. Wagner, H. Mahrholdt, and U. Sechtem. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 90:893–901, 2004.
Nayler, G. L., D. N. Firmin, and D. B. Longmore. Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 10:715–722, 1986.
Nishimura, R. Aortic valve disease. Circulation 106:770–772, 2002.
Otto, C. M., B. K. Lind, D. W. Kitzman, B. J. Gersh, and D. Siscovik. Association of aortic-valve sclerosis with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in the elderly. N. Eng. J. Med. 341:142–147, 1999.
Otto, C. M., A. S. Pearlman, K. A. Comess, R. P. Reamer, C. L. Janko, and L. L. Huntsman. Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 7:509–517, 1986.
Richards, K. E., D. Deserranno, N. L. Greenberg, J. D. Thomas, and M. J. Garcia. Effect of jet eccentricity on functional severity of congenital aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 39:420A, 2002.
Skjaerpe, T., L. Hegrenaes, and L. Hatle. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 72:810–818, 1985.
Sondergaard, L., F. Stahlberg, and C. Thomsen. Magnetic resonance imaging of valvular heart disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10:627–638, 1999.
Sondergaard, L., F. Stahlberg, C. Thomsen, A. Stensgaard, K. Lindvig, and O. Henriksen. Accuracy and precision of MR velocity mapping in measurement of stenotic cross-sectional area, flow-rate, and pressure-gradient. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3:433-437, 1993.
Stewart, B. F., D. Siscovik, B. K. Lind, J. M. Gardin, J. S. Gottdiener, V. E. Smith, D. W. Kitzman, and C. M. Otto. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 29:630–634, 1997.
Strohm, O., J. Schulz-Menger, D. Hanlein, R. Dietz, and M. G. Friedrich. Magnetic resonance planimetry of the vena contracta as a new approach to assessment of stenotic heart valves: An in vitro study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14:31–34, 2001.
Zoghbi, W. A., K. L. Farmer, J. G. Soto, J. G. Nelson, and M. A. Quinones. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 73:452–459, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waters, E.A., Caruthers, S.D. & Wickline, S.A. Correlation Analysis of Stenotic Aortic Valve Flow Patterns Using Phase Contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng 33, 878–887 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-2865-9
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-2865-9