Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urinary Diversion After Total Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Total cystectomy is indicated for the treatment of bulky primary rectal cancers as well as previously treated, locally recurrent tumors that invade the bladder, prostate, seminal vesicle, or urethra. We review a 10-year Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience with urinary diversion in this setting.

Methods: Between April 1988 and June 1998, 47 patients underwent urinary diversion during a total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer. Charts and operative records were reviewed to determine pathological findings, short-term and long-term urological complications, and survival.

Results: Forty-seven patients (25 males and 22 females; median age, 62 years; age range, 27–79 years) were included. Sixteen (34%) patients underwent cystectomy for a primary rectal tumor (including 1 for rectal sarcoma and 1 for synchronous invasive bladder cancer), and 31 (66%) patients underwent surgery for a locally recurrent rectal cancer. Thirty (64%) patients underwent preoperative, 18 (38%) underwent intraoperative, and 11 (23%) underwent postoperative radiotherapy. Twenty-six (55%) patients received preoperative and 16 (34%) underwent postoperative chemotherapy. Two patients had continent ileal cecal reservoirs, 1 a colonic conduit, and the remaining 45 had ileal conduits. The tumor invaded the bladder in 24 (51%) patients, the prostate in 5 (11%) patients, and the seminal vesicle in 5 (11%) patients. Complete resection was achieved in 42 (89%) patients. There were a total of eight complications in eight (17%) patients. There were three early complications, two of which were ileoureteral anastomotic leaks, one managed by reoperation, the second by percutaneous drainage, and one moderate hydronephrosis managed expectantly. There were five late complications; three patients had ureteral stricture/stenosis, leading to nephrectomy in one patient and percutaneous stenting in two patients. Two patients developed late hydronephrosis, so far managed expectantly. There was one perioperative death. After a median follow-up of 16.83 months, 20 patients were dead of the disease, 6 were alive with disease recurrence, 2 were dead of other causes, and 19 had no evidence of disease. Three-year actuarial disease-specific survival was 34%.

Conclusions: Complete resection of bulky primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer can be performed with acceptable urological morbidity. Complete resection was obtained in 89% of patients, with 72% having urological organ invasion. Overall urological complications of 17% are acceptably low despite intensive perioperative radiation and chemotherapy. Disease-specific survival in these patients remains limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49:8–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Schilsky RL. Cancer of the rectum. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practices of Oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott- Raven, 1997:1197–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pilipshen SJ, Heilweil M, Quan SH, Sternberg SS, Enker WE. Patterns of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal Cancer. Cancer 1984;53:1354–1362.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sagar PM, Pemberton JH. Surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:293–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. Detection and treatment of recurrent cancer of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1978;135:505–511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunderson LI, Sosin H. Areas of failure found at reoperation (second or symptomatic look) following “curative surgery” for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Cancer 1974;34:1278–1292.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao AR, Kagan AR, Chan PM, Gilbert HA, Nussbaum H, Huntz BL. Patterns of recurrence following curative resection alone for adenocarcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid colon. Cancer 1981;48:1492–1495.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rich T, Gunderson LI, Lew R, Galdibini JJ, Cohen AM, Donaldson G. Patterns of recurrence of rectal Cancer after potentially curative surgery. Cancer 1983;52:1317–1329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Petros JG, Lopez MJ. Pelvic exenteration for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Clin North Am 1994;3:257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brunschwig A. Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma: a one-stage abdominoperineal operation with endocolostomy and bilateral ureteral reimplantation into the colon above the colostomy. Cancer 1948;1:177–183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bricker EM. Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am 1950;30:1511–1521.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bricker EM. Evolution of radical pelvic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1994;3:197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen AM, Minsky BD. Aggressive surgical management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:432–438.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wanebo HJ, Gaker DL, Whitehill R, et al. Pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer: options for curative resection. Ann Surg 1987;205:482–495.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrison LB, Enker WE, Anderson LL. High dose intraoperative radiation therapy for colorectal cancer. Oncology 1995;9:737–741.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rowland RG, Mitchell ME, Bihrle R, et al. Indiana continent urinary reservoir. J Urol 1987;137:1136–1139.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hill JT, Ransley PG. The colonic conduit: a better method of urinary diversion? Br J Urol 1983;55:629–631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ritchie JP. Sigmoid conduit urinary diversion. Urol Clin North Am 1986;13:225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seigne J, McDougal WS. Urinary diversion. Surg Clin North Am 1994;3:307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McGuire M, Grimaldi G, Groatas J, Russo P. The type of urinary diversion after radical cystectomy significantly impacts on the patient’s quality of life. Presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, San Diego, CA, March 21–25, 1998.

  21. Salo JC, Paty PB, Guillem J, Minsky BD, Harrison LB, Cohen AM. Surgical salvage of recurrent rectal carcinoma after curative resection: a 10 year experience. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:171–177.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Russo MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, P., Ravindran, B., Katz, J. et al. Urinary Diversion After Total Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6, 732–738 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0732-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0732-x

Key Words

Navigation