Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

VATS Port Site Recurrence: A Technique Dependent Problem

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has become an accepted approach for the diagnosis and treatment of thoracic malignancies. Port site tumor recurrence is a reported complication of VATS. However, the true incidence of this problem is unknown. To try to determine the incidence of port site recurrence, we analyzed our experience with patients undergoing VATS wedge resection for malignancy.

Methods Data were obtained from our prospective VATS database. The analysis was confined to patients undergoing VATS wedge resection for malignancy, excluding those having a pleural biopsy only. Parameters analyzed included demographic factors, surgical technique, and port site recurrences identified by physical examination, CT scan, or both.

Results From 1992 to 1996, 410 patients (182 men, 228 women; median age= 61 years) underwent a VATS wedge resection for malignancy. The procedure was performed for diagnosis or staging in 90% of cases. Access incisions plus port sites were used in 97 (24%) patients; port sites only were used in 313 (76%) patients. Conversion to thoracotomy was necessary in 102 patients (25%) either for definitive resection (58 patients) or because VATS was not technically adequate (44 patients). Specimens were retrieved via access incisions or port sites with or without a specimen bag. The operative mortality was 0.25%. With long-term follow-up (median= 25 months) available for 374 patients (91%), only one port site recurrence was identified (0.26%).

ConclusionOur experience confirms the safety of VATS wedge resection in cancer patients. The incidence of port site tumor recurrence is low when oncologic principles are respected. In our institution, these principles include performing VATS wedge resection only for lesions that can be widely removed; converting to thoracotomy for definitive or extensive cancer operation; and using meticulous technique for the extraction of specimens from the pleural space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Jacobeus HC. The practical importance of thoracoscopy in surgery of the chest. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1922; 34: 289.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weissberg D, Kaufman M. Diagnostic and therapeutic pleuroscopy: experience with 127 patients. Chest 1980; 78: 732–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boutin C, Viallat JR, Cargnino P, et al. Thoracoscopy in malignant pleural effusions. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981; 124: 588–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutin C, Viallat JR, Cargnino P, et al. Thoracoscopic lung biopsy. Experimental and clinical preliminary study. Chest 1982; 82: 44–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutter JA, Harari D, Braimbridge MV. The management of empyema thoracis by thoracoscopy and irrigation. Ann Thorac Surg 1985; 39: 517–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Page RD, Jeffrey RR, Donnelly RJ. Thoracoscopy. A review of 121 consecutive surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 1989; 48: 66–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mack MJ, Scruggs GR, Kelly KM, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery: has technology found its place? Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 211–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hazelrigg SR, Nunchuck SK, LoCicero JIII. Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery Study Group data. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 1039–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krasna MJ, Deshmukh S, McLaughlin JS. Complications of thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 1066–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murthy SM, Goldschmidt RA, Rao LN, et al. The influence of surgical trauma on experimental metastasis. Cancer 1989; 64: 2035–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Buhr J, BerghäuserK-H, Morr H, et al. Tumor cells in intraoperative pleural lavage. An indicator for the poor prognosis of bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer 1990; 65: 1801–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Okumura M, Ohshima S, Kotake Y, et al. Intraoperative pleural lavage cytology in lung cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 51: 599–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Collard JM, Reymond MA. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for cancer. Risk of parietal seeding and of early local recurrence. Int Surg 1996; 81: 343–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Downey RJ, McCormack P, LoCicero JIII, et al. Dissemination of malignant tumors after video-assisted thoracic surgery: a report of twenty-one cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 954–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh GL, Nesbitt JC. Tumor implants after thoracoscopic resection of a metastatic sarcoma. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 215–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thurer RL. Video-assisted thoracic surgery [letter]. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 199–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Buhr J, HürtgenM, Kelm C, et al. Tumor dissemination after thoracoscopic resection for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110: 855–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wille GA, Gregory R, Guernsey JM. Tumor implantation at port site of video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary metastasis. West J Med 1997; 166: 65–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dixit AS, Martin CJ, Flynn P. Port-site recurrence after thoracoscopic resection of oesophageal cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 1997; 67: 148–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sartorelli KH, Partrick D, MeagherDPJr. Port-site recurrence after thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary metastasis owing to osteogenic sarcoma. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 1443–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zegdi R, Azorin J, Tremblay B, et al. Videothoracoscopic lung biopsy in diffuse infiltrative lung diseases: a 5-year surgical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1170–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen MS, Deschamps C, Lee RE, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic stapled wedge excision for indeterminate pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 106: 1048–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mouroux J, ElkaïmD, Padovani B, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: Technique and results of one hundred cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 385–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bardini R, Asolati M. Thoracoscopic resection of benign tumours of the esophagus. Int Surg 1997; 82: 5–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pellegrini C, Wetter LA, Patti M, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy. Initial experience with a new approach for the treatment of achalasia. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 291–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mack MJ. Thoracoscopy and its role in mediastinal disease and sympathectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 4: 332–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Craig SR, Walker WS. Initial experience of video assisted thoracoscopic pneumonectomy. Thorax 1995; 50: 392–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR, Mack MJ, et al. Postoperative pain-related morbidity: Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 1285–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Collard JM, Lengele B, Otte JB, et al. En bloc and standard esophagectomies by thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 675–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yim APC, KoK-M, MaC-C, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy for benign diseases. Chest 1996; 109: 554–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. CollardJ-M. En bloc and standard esophagectomies by thoracoscopy. Update. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 769–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, et al. Lobectomy-video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 997–1002.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Giudicelli R, Thomas P, Lonjon T, et al. Video-assisted minithoracotomy versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for performing lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 712–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain after pulmonary resection by thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 1079–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Martinez J, Targarona EM, BalaguéC, et al. Port site metastasis. An unresolved problem in laparoscopic surgery. Int Surg 1995; 80: 315–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yim APC. Port-site recurrence following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 1133–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Buhr J. Does video-assisted thoracic surgery disseminate tumor? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 1109–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

    K. Parekh, V. Rusch, M. Bains, R. Downey & R. Ginsberg

  2. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021

    V. Rusch

Authors
  1. K. Parekh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Rusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Bains
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Downey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Ginsberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Rusch.

Additional information

Dr. Parekh is a resident in General Surgery at the Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, and was supported by a research fellowship from that institution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parekh, K., Rusch, V., Bains, M. et al. VATS Port Site Recurrence: A Technique Dependent Problem. Ann Surg Oncol 8, 175–178 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0175-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0175-5

Key Words

Search

Navigation