Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current National Health Insurance Coverage Policies for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Prophylactic Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in reducing breast and ovarian carcinoma has recently been reported in high-risk women. Because cost has become central to medical decision-making, this study was designed to evaluate currently existing coverage policies for these procedures.

Methods: A confidential detailed cross-sectional nationwide survey of 481 edical directors from the American Association of Health Plans, Medicare, and Medicaid was conducted.

Results: Of the 150 respondents, 65% (n 5 97) had 100,000 or more enrolled members and 35% (n 5 53) had fewer than 100,000 enrolled members. Only 44% of private plans have specific policies for coverage of prophylactic mastectomy for a strong family history of breast cancer and 38% of plans for a BRCA mutation. Only 20% of total responding plans had a policy for coverage of prophylactic oophorectomy under any clinical circumstance. Governmental carriers were significantly less likely to have any policy for prophylactic surgery (range, 2%–12%) compared with nongovernmental plans (range, 24%–44%; P,.001). No significant regional differences for coverage policies were identified (P.05).

Conclusions: Significant variations currently exist for health insurance coverage of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy. As genetic testing becomes widespread, more uniform policies should be established to enable appropriate high-risk candidates equal access and coverage for these procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994;266:66–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 1995;378:789–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Struewing JP, Abeliovich D, Peretz T, et al. The carrier frequency of the BRCA1 185delAG mutation is approximately 1 percent in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. Nat Gene 1995;11:198–200.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ford D, Easton DF, Bishop DT, Narod SA, Goldgar DE. Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers: Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Lancet 1994;343:692–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Easton DF, Ford D, Bishop DT. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers: Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 1995;56:265–71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:77–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Struewing JP, Watson P, Easton DF, Ponder BA, Lynch HT, Tucker MA. Prophylactic oophorectomy in inherited breast/ovarian cancer families. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1995;17:33–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rebbeck TR, Levin AM, Eisen A, et al. Breast cancer risk after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1475–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuerer HM, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ. Prophylactic mastectomy in women with a high risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1838–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steiner CA, Powe NR, Anderson GF, Das A. The review processused by US health care plans to evaluate new medical technology for coverage. J Gen Intern Med 1996;11:294–302.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, et al. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA 1997;277:997–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vasen HF, Haites NE, Evans DG, et al. Current policies for surveillance and management in women at risk of breast and ovarian cancer: a survey among 16 European family cancer clinics: European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1922–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1371–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Narod SA, Risch H, Moslehi R, et al. Oral contraceptives and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer: Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998;339:424–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Niederhuber JE. Genetic testing for cancer: the surgeon’s critical role. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:74–93.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes KS, Papa MZ, Whitney T, McLellan R. Prophylactic mastectomy and inherited predisposition to breast carcinoma. Cancer 1999;86:1682–96.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holleb AI, Montgomery R, Farrow JH. The hazard of incomplete simple mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1965;121:819–22.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ziegler LD, Kroll SS. Primary breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy. Am J Clin Oncol 1991;14:451–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pennisi VR, Capozzi A. Subcutaneous mastectomy data: a final statistical analysis of 1500 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1989;13:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:1048–53.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Miller MJ, et al. The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: one center’s experience with 211 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg 1994;32:234–41.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singletary SE, Kroll SS. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Adv Surg 1996;30:39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gershenwald JE, Hunt KK, Kroll SS, et al. Synchronous elective contralateral mastectomy and immediate bilateral breast reconstruction in women with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:529–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. NIH consensus conference. Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and follow-up: NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer. JAMA 1995;273:491–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Partridge EE, Barnes MN. Epithelial ovarian cancer: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49:297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tobacman JK, Greene MH, Tucker MA, Costa J, Kase R, Fraumeni JF Jr. Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in ovarian-cancer-prone families. Lancet 1982;2:795–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Piver MS, Jishi MF, Tsukada Y, Nava G. Primary peritoneal carcinoma after prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer: a report of the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry. Cancer 1993;71:2751–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC. Decision analysis: effects of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy on life expectancy among women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1465–71.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Grann VR, Panageas KS, Whang W, Antman KH, Neugut AI. Decision analysis of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:979–85.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW, Hellman S. Contralateral breast carcinoma: an assessment of risk and prognosis in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) patients with 20-year followup. Surgery 1989;106:904–10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leis HP Jr. Selective, elective, prophylactic contralateral mastectomy. Cancer 1971;28:956–61.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS. Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast: a long-term follow-up study. Cancer 1985;55:2698–708.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frank TS, Manley SA, Olopade OI, et al. Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2417–25.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Society of Surgical Oncology. SSO develops position statement on prophylactic mastectomies. Soc Surg Oncol News 1993;1:10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuerer, H.M., Hwang, E.S., Anthony, J.P. et al. Current National Health Insurance Coverage Policies for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Prophylactic Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 7, 325–332 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0325-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0325-1

Keywords

Navigation