Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence of Sentinel Node Metastasis in Patients With Thin Primary Melanoma (#1 mm) With Vertical Growth Phase

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Patients with thin primary melanomas (#1 mm) generally have an excellent prognosis. However, the presence of a vertical growth phase (VGP) adversely impacts the survival rate. We report on the rate of occurrence of nodal metastasis in patients with thin primary melanomas with a VGP who are offered sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy.

Methods: Among 235 patients with clinically localized cutaneous melanomas who underwent successful SLN biopsy, 71 had lesions 1 mm or smaller with a VGP. The SLN was localized by using blue dye and a radiotracer. If negative for tumor by using hematoxylin and eosin staining, the SLN was further examined by immunohistochemistry.

Results: The rate of occurrence of SLN metastasis was 15.2% in patients with melanomas deeper than 1 mm and 5.6% in patients with thin melanomas. Three patients with thin melanomas and a positive SLN had low-risk lesions, based on a highly accurate six-variable multivariate logistic regression model for predicting 8-year survival in stage I/II melanomas. The fourth patient had a low- to intermediate-risk lesion based on this model. At the time of the lymphadenectomy, one patient had two additional nodes with metastasis.

Conclusions: VGP in a melanoma 1 mm or smaller seems to be a risk factor for nodal metastasis. The risk of nodal disease may not be accurately predicted by the use of a multivariate logistic regression model that incorporates thickness, mitotic rate, regression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, sex, and anatomical site. Patients with thin lesions having VGP should be evaluated for SLN biopsy and trials of adjuvant therapy when stage III disease is found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Slingluff CL, Seigler H. Melanoma. In: Sabiston DCJ, ed.Textbook of Surgery: The Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. 15th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1997:515–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rigel D, Friedman R, Kopf A. The incidence of malignant melanoma in the United States: issues as we approach the 21st century. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34:839–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Consensus Statement. Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma. NIH Consensus Development Conference January 27–29, 1992.

  4. Kelly JW, Sagebiel RW, Clyman S, Blois MS.Thin level IV malignant melanoma: a subset in which level is the major prognostic indicator. Ann Surg 1985;202:98–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Naruns PL, Nizze JA, Cochran AJ, Lee MB, Morton DL. Recurrence potential of thin primary melanomas. Cancer 1986;57:545–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw HM, McCarthy WH, McCarthy SW, Milton GW.Thin malignant melanomas and recurrence potential. Arch Surg 1987; 122:1147–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Slingluff CLJr, Vollmer RT, Reintgen DS, Seigler HF. Lethal. “thin” malignant melanoma. Ann Surg 1988;208:150–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woods JE, Soule EH, Creagan ET.Metastasis and death in patients with thin melanoma (less than 0.76 mm). Ann Surg 1983;198: 63–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark W Jr, Elder D, Guerry IV D, et al. Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1893–1904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Szymik B, Woosley J. Further validation of the prognostic model for stage I malignant melanoma based on tumor progression. J Cutan Pathol 1993;20:50 –3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark WH Jr, Elder DE, Guerry D IV, Epstein MN, Greene MH, Van Horn M. A study of tumor progression: the precursor lesions of superficial spreading and nodular melanoma. Hum Pathol 1984; 15:1147–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herlyn M, Clark WH, Rodeck U, Mancianti ML, Jambrosic J, Koprowski H. Biology of tumor progression in human melanocytes. Lab Invest 1987;56:461–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guerry D IV, Synnestvedt M, Elder D, Schultz D. Lessons from tumor progression: the invasive radial growth phase of melanoma is common, incapable of metastasis, and indolent. J Invest Dermatol 1993;100:342S–5S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Straume O, Akslen L. Independent prognostic importance of vascular invasion in nodular melanomas. Cancer 1996;78:1211–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson OJ, Emrich L, Karakousis C, Rao U, Greco W. Comparison of prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in malignant melanoma of the skin, clinical stage I. Cancer 1985;55:1107–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Herlyn M, Balaban G, Bennicelli J, et al. Primary melanoma cells of the vertical growth phase: similarities to metastatic cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1985;74:283–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elder D, Rodeck U, Thurin J, et al. Antigenic profile of tumor progression stages in human melanocytic nevi and melanoma. Cancer Res 1989;49:5091–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rak J, Hegmann E, Lu C, Kerbel R. Progressive loss of sensitivity to endothelium derived growth inhibitors expressed by human melanoma cells during disease progression. J Cell Physiol 1994; 159:245–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wanebo HJ, Cooper PH, Hagar RW. Thin (,1 mm) melanomas of the extremities are biologically favorable lesions not influenced by regression. Ann Surg 1985;201:499 –504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gromet M, Epstein W, Blois M. The regressing thin malignant melanoma: a distinctive lesion with metastatic potential. Cancer 1978;42:2282–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Paladugu R, Yonemoto R. Biologic behavior of thin malignant melanoma with regressive changes. Arch Surg 1983;118:41–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ronan SG, Eng AM, Briele HA, Shioura NN, Das Gupta TK. Thin malignant melanomas with regression and metastases. Arch Dermatol 1987;123:1326–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCarthy W, Shaw H, McCarthy S, Rivers J, Thompson J. Cutaneous melanomas that defy conventional prognostic indicators. Semin Oncol 1996;23:709 –13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krag D, Meijer S, Weaver D, et al. Minimal access surgery for staging of malignant melanoma. Arch Surg 1995;130:654–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McDermott N, Hayes D, al-Sader M, et al. Identification of vertical growth phase in malignant melanoma: a study of interobserver agreement. Am J Clin Pathol 1998;110:753–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bedrosian, I., Faries, M.B., Guerry IV, D. et al. Incidence of Sentinel Node Metastasis in Patients With Thin Primary Melanoma (#1 mm) With Vertical Growth Phase. Ann Surg Oncol 7, 262–267 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0262-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0262-z

Key Words:

Navigation