Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Learning you are “at risk”: seniors’ experiences of nutrition risk screening

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
European Journal of Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nutrition risk screening can help identify community-dwelling older adults who may benefit from nutrition education and interventions to improve food intake. Research has shown, however, that older adults who are found “at risk” through nutrition screening commonly do not see themselves at risk, and many do not follow through with accessing recommended nutrition services. Thus, the purpose of this qualitative study was to examine older adults’ experiences of learning they were at risk through nutrition screening and to identify what influenced their perspectives and responses to their screening results. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 22 older adults who had screened at risk (SCREEN II© scores < 54) through a nutrition screening process conducted by mail. Participants received their screening results in a personalized letter before the interview, along with some recommendations to help improve food intake and decrease their nutrition risk. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes. When participants reflected about receiving their screening results, some described feeling surprised or even upset by the message that they were at increased risk, whereas others felt unconcerned or reacted with heightened attentiveness to their nutrition. They also began to rationalize their screening score and found ways to explain away their risk. The message that they were at increased risk was poorly understood and not well received because it contradicted their perspective: they felt they were doing the right things, they saw room for improvement rather than seeing themselves at risk, and they tended to make comparisons that helped support the view that they were not truly at risk. Further, even though participants saw room for improvement, they described barriers to change and commonly felt that the recommendations were more applicable for others than themselves. Strategies to improve communication of nutrition screening results and recommendations are discussed to help seniors better understand their risk and take steps to improve their nutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Dietetic Association (2005) Position paper of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition across the spectrum of aging. J Am Diet Assoc 105(4):613–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Angus J, Evans S, Lapum J et al (2005) “Sneaky disease”: the body and health knowledge for people at risk for coronary heart disease in ontario, Canada. Soc Sci Med 60(9):2117–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callen B (2004) Understanding nutritional health in older adults. J Gerontol Nurs 30(1):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Donini LM, Savina C, Rosano A, Cannella C (2007) Systematic review of nutritional status evaluation and screening tools in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 11(5):421–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Green SM, Watson R (2006) Nutritional screening and assessment tools for older adults: literature review. J Adv Nurs 54(4):477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson K, Ekblad J, Sidenvall B (2005) Older women and dietary advice: occurrence, comprehension and compliance. J Hum Nutr Diet 18:453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller HH (2007) Promoting food intake in older adults living in the community: a review. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 32:991–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller HH, Hedley MR, Brownlee SW (2000) The development of seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition (SCREEN). Can J Diet Prac Res 61:67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller HH, Goy R, Kane S-L (2005) Validity and reliability of SCREEN II (seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition, version II). Eur J Clin Nutr 59:1149–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller HH, Haresign H, Brockest B (2007) Bringing nutrition screening to seniors in Canada (BNSS) process evaluation. Can J Diet Pract Res 68:86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein CTF, Helweg-Larsen M (2002) Perceived control and the optimistic bias: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Health 17(4):437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey K, Pritchett E (2003) Nutrition care process and model: ADA adopts road map to quality care and outcomes management. J Am Diet Assoc 103:1061–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLellan D, Berenbaum S (2007) Canadian dietitians’ understanding of the client-centered approach to nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc 107:1414–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKie L, MacInnes A, Hendry J, Donald S, Peace H (2000) The food consumption patterns and perceptions of dietary advice of older people. J Hum Nutr Diet 13:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas C (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Payette H, Shatenstein B (2005) Determinants of healthy eating in community-dwelling elderly people. Can J Public Health 96:S27–S31

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips MB, Foley AL, Barnard R, Isenring EA, Miller MD (2010) Nutritional screening in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic literature review. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 19(3):440–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Raats MM, Sparks P (1995) Unrealistic optimism about diet-related risks: implications for interventions. Proc Nutr Soc 54:737–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Pligt J (1996) Perceived risk, comparative optimism and behaviour. In: Georgas J, Manthouli M, Besevegis E, Kokkevi A (eds) Contemporary psychology in Europe: theory, research, and applications: proceedings of the IVth European congress of psychology. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Seattle, pp 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • White MP, Pahl S, Buehner M, Haye A (2003) Trust in risky messages: the role of prior attitudes. Risk Anal 23:717–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Guelph-Wellington Seniors’ Association for assistance with recruitment of participants for this study. This study was supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council [Canada Graduate Scholarship (Master’s)].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly Reimer.

Additional information

Responsible editor: D.J.H. Deeg.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 205 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reimer, H., Keller, H. & Tindale, J. Learning you are “at risk”: seniors’ experiences of nutrition risk screening. Eur J Ageing 9, 81–89 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-011-0208-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-011-0208-2

Keywords

Navigation