Abstract
Nutrition risk screening can help identify community-dwelling older adults who may benefit from nutrition education and interventions to improve food intake. Research has shown, however, that older adults who are found “at risk” through nutrition screening commonly do not see themselves at risk, and many do not follow through with accessing recommended nutrition services. Thus, the purpose of this qualitative study was to examine older adults’ experiences of learning they were at risk through nutrition screening and to identify what influenced their perspectives and responses to their screening results. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 22 older adults who had screened at risk (SCREEN II© scores < 54) through a nutrition screening process conducted by mail. Participants received their screening results in a personalized letter before the interview, along with some recommendations to help improve food intake and decrease their nutrition risk. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes. When participants reflected about receiving their screening results, some described feeling surprised or even upset by the message that they were at increased risk, whereas others felt unconcerned or reacted with heightened attentiveness to their nutrition. They also began to rationalize their screening score and found ways to explain away their risk. The message that they were at increased risk was poorly understood and not well received because it contradicted their perspective: they felt they were doing the right things, they saw room for improvement rather than seeing themselves at risk, and they tended to make comparisons that helped support the view that they were not truly at risk. Further, even though participants saw room for improvement, they described barriers to change and commonly felt that the recommendations were more applicable for others than themselves. Strategies to improve communication of nutrition screening results and recommendations are discussed to help seniors better understand their risk and take steps to improve their nutrition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Dietetic Association (2005) Position paper of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition across the spectrum of aging. J Am Diet Assoc 105(4):613–633
Angus J, Evans S, Lapum J et al (2005) “Sneaky disease”: the body and health knowledge for people at risk for coronary heart disease in ontario, Canada. Soc Sci Med 60(9):2117–2128
Callen B (2004) Understanding nutritional health in older adults. J Gerontol Nurs 30(1):36–43
Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Donini LM, Savina C, Rosano A, Cannella C (2007) Systematic review of nutritional status evaluation and screening tools in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 11(5):421–432
Green SM, Watson R (2006) Nutritional screening and assessment tools for older adults: literature review. J Adv Nurs 54(4):477–490
Gustafsson K, Ekblad J, Sidenvall B (2005) Older women and dietary advice: occurrence, comprehension and compliance. J Hum Nutr Diet 18:453–460
Keller HH (2007) Promoting food intake in older adults living in the community: a review. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 32:991–1000
Keller HH, Hedley MR, Brownlee SW (2000) The development of seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition (SCREEN). Can J Diet Prac Res 61:67–72
Keller HH, Goy R, Kane S-L (2005) Validity and reliability of SCREEN II (seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition, version II). Eur J Clin Nutr 59:1149–1157
Keller HH, Haresign H, Brockest B (2007) Bringing nutrition screening to seniors in Canada (BNSS) process evaluation. Can J Diet Pract Res 68:86–91
Klein CTF, Helweg-Larsen M (2002) Perceived control and the optimistic bias: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Health 17(4):437–446
Lacey K, Pritchett E (2003) Nutrition care process and model: ADA adopts road map to quality care and outcomes management. J Am Diet Assoc 103:1061–1072
MacLellan D, Berenbaum S (2007) Canadian dietitians’ understanding of the client-centered approach to nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc 107:1414–1417
McKie L, MacInnes A, Hendry J, Donald S, Peace H (2000) The food consumption patterns and perceptions of dietary advice of older people. J Hum Nutr Diet 13:173–183
Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, New York
Moustakas C (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Payette H, Shatenstein B (2005) Determinants of healthy eating in community-dwelling elderly people. Can J Public Health 96:S27–S31
Phillips MB, Foley AL, Barnard R, Isenring EA, Miller MD (2010) Nutritional screening in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic literature review. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 19(3):440–449
Raats MM, Sparks P (1995) Unrealistic optimism about diet-related risks: implications for interventions. Proc Nutr Soc 54:737–745
van der Pligt J (1996) Perceived risk, comparative optimism and behaviour. In: Georgas J, Manthouli M, Besevegis E, Kokkevi A (eds) Contemporary psychology in Europe: theory, research, and applications: proceedings of the IVth European congress of psychology. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Seattle, pp 91–102
White MP, Pahl S, Buehner M, Haye A (2003) Trust in risky messages: the role of prior attitudes. Risk Anal 23:717–726
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Guelph-Wellington Seniors’ Association for assistance with recruitment of participants for this study. This study was supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council [Canada Graduate Scholarship (Master’s)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: D.J.H. Deeg.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reimer, H., Keller, H. & Tindale, J. Learning you are “at risk”: seniors’ experiences of nutrition risk screening. Eur J Ageing 9, 81–89 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-011-0208-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-011-0208-2