Abstract
During spinal fusion surgery, angled screw insertion can provide a more favorable stress distribution reducing failure events (screw breakage and loosening). Finite element (FE) analysis can be employed for identifying the optimal insertion path, preventing stress concentrations, and ensuring a lower failure incidence. In this work, a patient-specific FE model of L4 vertebra, virtually implanted with two pedicle screws, was obtained from diagnostic images and numerically investigated. Linearly elastic, inhomogeneous, and isotropic material properties were assigned to bone based on density distributions reconstructed from the medical images. The mechanical response of the screws-vertebra system was analyzed through a progressive damage procedure, considering a stress-based criterion. Different screws insertion angles were simulated, as well as physiological loading conditions. In each loading case, screw orientation influences the fracture mechanism (i.e., brittle or ductile one), as well as the fracture pattern and load. Besides, stresses in trabecular bone and pedicle screws are significantly affected by the screw configuration. The caudomedial trajectory indicates the most safe case, significantly reducing the stress concentrations in both trabecular bone and screws. Our findings aim to furnish a useful indication to surgeons regarding the screws insertion angle, further reducing the failure risk and improving the clinical outcome of the fixation procedure.
GraphicAbstract
A patient-specific image-based FE modeling strategy of implanted human vertebra is developed and used to investigate the effect of pedicle screw insertion angles on the stress distribution in the human vertebra to find the safest screw insertion trajectory that minimizes stress concentrations reducing the onset of loosening phenomena and/or screw breakage. A caudomedial trajectory significantly reduces the stress concentrations in both trabecular bone and screws, resulting in the least critical case, thus safer from a clinical perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rutherford, E., Tarplett, L., Davies, E., et al.: Lumbar spine fusion and stabilization: hardware, techniques, and imaging appearances. Radiographics 27, 1737–1749 (2007)
Chen, C.S., Chen, W.J., Cheng, C.K., et al.: Failure analysis of broken pedicle screws on spinal instrumentation. Med. Eng. Phys. 27, 487–496 (2005)
Sterba, W., Kim, D.G., Fyhrie, D.P., et al.: Biomechanical analysis of differing pedicle screw insertion angles. Clin. Biomech. 22, 385–91 (2007)
Jutte, P.C., Castelein, R.M.: Complications of pedicle screws in lumbar and lumbosacral fusions in 105 consecutive primary operations. Eur. Spine J. 11, 594–598 (2003)
Galbusera, F., Volkheimer, D., Reitmaier, S., et al.: Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur. Spine J. 24, 1005–1016 (2015)
Newcomb, A.G.U.S., Baek, S., Kelly, B.P., et al.: Effect of screw position on load transfer in lumbar pedicle screws: a non-idealized finite element analysis. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 20, 1–11 (2017)
Ohba, T., Ebata, S., Oba, H., et al.: Risk factors for clinically relevant loosening of percutaneous pedicle screws. Spine Surg. Relat. Res. 3, 79–85 (2019)
Inceoglu, S., Montgomery, W.H., St. Clair, S., et al.: Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies. J. Neurosurg. Spine 14, 670-676 (2011)
Crawford, N.R., Yuksel, K.Z., Dogan, S., et al.: Trajectory analysis and pullout strength of self-centering lumbar pedicle screws. J. Neurosurg. Spine 10, 486–491 (2009)
Jones, A.C., Wilcox, R.K.: Finite element analysis of the spine: towards a framework of verification, validation and sensitivity analysis. Med. Eng. Phys. 30, 1287–1304 (2008)
Crawford, R.P., Cann, C.E., Keaveny, T.M.: Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone 33, 744–750 (2003)
Matsukawa, K., Yato, Y., Imabayashi, H., et al.: Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study. J. Neurosurg. Spine 23, 471–478 (2015)
Hussain, M., Natarajan, R.N., Fayyazi, A.H., et al.: Screw angulation affects bone-screw stresses and bone graft load sharing in anterior cervical corpectomy fusion with a rigid screw-plate construct: a finite element model study. Spine J. 9, 1016–1023 (2009)
Erdem, I., Truumees, E., Van der Meulen, M.C.H.: Simulation of the behaviour of the L1 vertebra for different material properties and loading conditions. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 16, 736–746 (2013)
Fields, A.J., Lee, G.L., Keaveny, T.M.: Mechanisms of initial endplate failure in the human vertebral body. J. Biomech. 43, 3126–3131 (2010)
Imai, K.: Analysis of vertebral bone strength, fracture Pattern, and fracture location:a validation study using a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element analysis. Aging Dis. 6, 180–187 (2015)
Falcinelli, C., Di Martino, A., Gizzi, A., et al.: Fracture risk assessment in metastatic femurs: a patient-specific CT-based finite-element approach. Meccanica 55, 861–881 (2020)
Taddei, F., Pancanti, A., Viceconti, M.: An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Med. Eng. Phys. 26, 61–69 (2004)
Keyak, J.H., Lee, I.Y., Skinner, H.B.: Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28, 1329–1336 (1994)
Morgan, E.F., Bayraktar, H.H., Keaveny, T.M.: Trabecular bone modulusCdensity relationships depend on anatomic site. J. Biomech. 36, 897–904 (2003)
Keller, T.S.: Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J. Biomech. 27, 1159–1168 (1994)
Chen, S.I., Lin, R.M., Chang, C.H.: Biomechanical investigation of pedicle screwCvertebrae complex: a finite element approach using bonded and contact interface conditions. Med. Eng. Phys. 25, 275–282 (2003)
Garfin, S., Eismont, F.J., Bell, G.R., et al.: Rothman-Simeone and Herkowitzs The Spine 2 Vol Set. 2208. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2017)
Xu, M., Yang, J., Lieberman, I.H., et al.: Finite element method-based study of pedicle screwCbone connection in pullout test and physiological spinal loads. Med. Eng. Phys. 67, 11–21 (2019)
Zysset, P.K., Curnier, A.: A 3D damage model for trabecular bone based on fabric tensors. J. Biomech. 29, 1549–1558 (1996)
Garcia, D., Zysset, P.K., Charlebois, M., et al.: A three-dimensional elastic plastic damage constitutive law for bone tissue. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 8, 149–165 (2009)
Viceconti, M., Olsen, S., Burton, K.: Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. Clin. Biomech. 20, 451–454 (2005)
Liu, M.Y., Tsai, T.T., Lai, P.L., et al.: Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength in synthetic bones: Effects of screw shape, core/thread profile and cement augmentation. PLoS ONE 15, e0229328 (2020)
Lee, D.C., Hoffmann, P.F., Kopperdahl, D.L., et al.: Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength Inter-operator reanalysis precision. Bone 103, 325–333 (2017)
Soleimani, M., Muthyala, N., Marino, M., et al.: A novel stress-induced anisotropic growth model driven by nutrient diffusion: theory, FEM implementation and applications in bio-mechanical problems. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 144, 104097 (2020)
Vasta, M., Gizzi, A., Pandolfi, A.: On three- and two-dimensional fiber distributed models of biological tissues. Probab. Eng. Mech. 37, 170–179 (2014)
Vasta, M., Gizzi, A., Pandolfi, A.: A spectral decomposition approach for the mechanical statistical characterization of distributed fiber-reinforced tissues. Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 106, 258–265 (2018)
Falcinelli, C., Li, Z., Lam, W.W., et al.: Diffusion-Tensor Imaging Versus Digitization in Reconstructing the Masseter Architecture. J. Biomech. Eng. 140, 111010–6 (2018)
Stadelmann, M.A., Maquer, G., Voumard, B., et al.: Integrating MRI-based geometry, composition and fiber architecture in a finite element model of the human intervertebral disc. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 85, 37–42 (2018)
Pakdel, A., Robert, N., Fialkov, J., et al.: Generalized method for computation of true thickness and x-ray intensity information in highly blurred sub-millimeter bone features in clinical CT images. Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 8099–8116 (2012)
Pakdel, A., Fialkov, J., Whyne, C.M.: High resolution bone material property assignment yields robust subject specific finite element models of complex thin bone structures. J. Biomech. 49, 1454–1460 (2016)
Schileo, E., Pitocchi, J., Falcinelli, C., et al.: Cortical bone mapping improves finite element strain prediction accuracy at the proximal femur. Bone 136, 115348 (2020)
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of the Italian National Group for Mathematical Physics (GNFM-INdAM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Executive Editor: Ji-Zeng Wang.
Appendix A
Appendix A
To derive the density-based E values for the cortical shell of the vertebra, a customized equation (Eq. (5)) has been adopted and derived as follows. Five values of \(\rho _{app}\) and the corresponding E values have been defined. These pairs have been chosen through a preliminary analysis aiming to obtain for the cortical shell a heterogeneous E distribution with values of Youngs modulus in line with the literature (i.e., ranging from 12 to 14 GPa). Then, these pairs have been fitted through a fitting procedure. Among the several fitting relations, a power relationship, that can be expressed in a general form as
has been chosen due to its ability to fit well data with a coefficient of determination R\(^2\) equal to 0.91. In Table 5, the \(\rho _{app}\)-E values used to derive the Eq. (5) have been reported. The fitting procedure furnished the following coefficients for the power relation expressed by Eq. (A1): \(a=-892.5\), \(b=-2.491\) and \(c=14360\).
1.1 Appendix B
In Tables 6 and 7 the p values of the Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene’s test have been reported for the two tested variables, i.e. \(\sigma _{\max }\) and \(\sigma _\mathrm{{VM}}\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molinari, L., Falcinelli, C., Gizzi, A. et al. Biomechanical modeling of metal screw loadings on the human vertebra. Acta Mech. Sin. 37, 307–320 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-021-01063-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-021-01063-5