Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast vascular mapping obtained with contrast-enhanced MR imaging: implications for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification

  • MRI for the Assessment of Organ Vascularization
  • Published:
European Radiology Supplements

Abstract

The value of breast vascular maps obtained using contrast-enhanced MR imaging has recently been explored. Additional information is obtained only by evaluating maximum intensity projections of the first dynamic subtraction to achieve a form of MR angiography of the breast. No increase in acquisition time and no dedicated contrast injections are needed. Four studies have been performed to evaluate the one-sided (asymmetric) increase in vascularity associated with ipsilateral cancer in a total of 404 patients with a cancer prevalence ranging from 38% to 80%. Sensitivity ranged from 72% to 88%, specificity from 57% to 100%, positive predictive value from 85% to 100%, negative predictive value from 38% to 88%, and overall accuracy from 73% to 87%. An asymmetric increase in breast vascularity ipsilateral to a cancer may be due to reduced flow resistance in the tumour, to a high metabolic rate (more likely in large tumours) or to angiogenic stimulation of the whole breast harbouring the lesion (more likely in small tumours). Tumour size could play a specific role in determining the ipsilaterally increased vascularity, and invasive cancers might be more frequently associated with ipsilaterally increased vascularity than in situ cancers. Moreover, while a reduction in breast vasculature has anecdotically been observed in breasts with locally advanced cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially when taxanes are used, the higher incidence of breast cancer in patients with size asymmetry between the breasts as determined on screening mammography suggests that a role for breast MR vascular mapping in breast cancer risk stratification should be explored. Finally, arteries and veins might be differentiated with dedicated techniques. High-relaxivity agents may be used with advantage in these future investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A (2002) Contrast agents and temporal resolution in breast MR imaging. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 21[Suppl 3]:69–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Maschio A, Bazzocchi M, Giuseppetti GM et al (2002) Breast MRI: report on a multicentric national trial by the Study Section of Magnetic Resonance and Breast Imaging. Radiol Med 104:262–272

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mahfouz AE, Sherif H, Saad A et al (2001) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the breast: is breast cancer associated with ipsilateral higher vascularity? Eur Radiol 11:965–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carriero A, Di Credico A, Mansour M, Bonomo L (2002) Maximum intensity projection analysis in magnetic resonance of the breast. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 21(3 Suppl):77–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A et al (2005) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging breast vascular maps: association between invasive cancer and ipsilateral increased vascularity. Radiology 235:791–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knopp MV, Bourne MW, Sardanelli F et al (2003) Gadobenate dimeglumine in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a dose response analysis and comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:663–676

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Occhiato R et al (2005) Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 237:45–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fausto A, Iozzelli A, Menicagli L, Sardanelli F (2006) Contrast enhanced MR imaging of the breast: one-side increased vasculature as a predictor of invasive cancer. Eur Radiol 16[Suppl 1]: 210

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cristofanilli M, Charnsangavej C, Hortobagyi GN (2002) Angiogenesis modulation in cancer research: novel clinical approaches. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1:415–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Esteva FJ, Sahin AA, Cristofanilli M et al (2002) Molecular prognostic factors for breast cancer metastasis and survival. Semin Radiat Oncol 12:319–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scutt D, Lancaster GA, Manning JT (2006) Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 8:R14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sardanelli F (2004) MultiHance for dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 14[Suppl 7]:O65–O70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Sardanelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sardanelli, F., Fausto, A., Menicagli, L. et al. Breast vascular mapping obtained with contrast-enhanced MR imaging: implications for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification. Eur Radiol Suppl 17 (Suppl 6), 48–51 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10406-007-0228-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10406-007-0228-3

Keywords

Navigation