Skip to main content
Log in

An air-chamber-based microfluidic stabilizer for attenuating syringe-pump-induced fluctuations

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Syringe pumps are commonly used in microfluidic systems to provide flows with precise control. But small periodic fluctuations on flow induced by the stepper motor in syringe pumps are a problem that influences the characteristics of the microfluidic system. This paper presents a microfluidic stabilizer which contains an air chamber. A specific amount of air is sealed in the air chamber and will attenuate the flow fluctuations by expanding or shrinking its volume. A theoretical model based on Euler equation is developed to clarify the characteristics of the microfluidic stabilizer. The result of simulations by finite element analysis is in good agreement with the theoretical model. A new method based on fluorescence detection and three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing is developed to measure the flow fluctuations induced by the pumps and also to characterize the buffering capacity of the stabilizer. It is experimentally demonstrated that the fluctuation amplitude is cut to 46% by one microfluidic stabilizer and reduced to 14% by two series connected stabilizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baah D, Floyd-Smith T (2014) Microfluidics for particle synthesis from photocrosslinkable materials. Microfluid Nanofluidics 17(3):431–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen P et al (2015) Multiplex serum cytokine immunoassay using nanoplasmonic biosensor microarrays. ACS Nano 9(4):4173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S et al (2011) Microfluidic-based biosensors toward point-of-care detection of nucleic acids and proteins. Microfluid Nanofluidics 10(2):231–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huh D et al (2010) Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science 328(5986):1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung LH et al (2006) Alternating droplet generation and controlled dynamic droplet fusion in microfluidic device for CdS nanoparticle synthesis. Lab Chip 6(2):174–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer V, Raj A, Annabattula RK, Sen AK (2015) Experimental and numerical studies of a microfluidic device with compliant chambers for flow stabilization. J Micromech Microeng. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/7/075003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang YJ, Yang S (2012) Fluidic low pass filter for hydrodynamic flow stabilization in microfluidic environments. Lab Chip 12(10):1881–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang YJ et al (2014) Bubble-free and pulse-free fluid delivery into microfluidic devices. Biomicrofluidics 8(1):330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C et al (2016) Water-head pumps provide precise and fast microfluidic pumping and switching versus syringe pumps. Microfluid Nanofluidics 20(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh A et al (2016) A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci Transl Med 8(366):366ra165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu PK, Cohen IM (2008) Fluid mechanics, 4th edn, vol 35. Academic Press, Waltham, MA, USA, p 460

    Google Scholar 

  • Laser DJ, Santiago JG, Microengineering (2004) A review of micropumps. J Micromech 14(6):R35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC et al (2005) Multistep synthesis of a radiolabeled imaging probe using integrated microfluidics. Science 310(5755):1793–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z et al (2014) Syringe-pump-induced fluctuation in all-aqueous microfluidic system implications for flow rate accuracy. Lab Chip 14(4):744–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligler FS, Kim JS (2010) The microflow cytometer. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran S et al (2008) Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 359(4):366–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen NT (2002) MEMS-micropumps: a review. ASME J Fluids Eng 124(2):384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J et al (2015) Atomic layer-by-layer deposition of Pt on Pd octahedra for enhanced catalysts toward the oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano 9(3):2635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauret A, Spandagos C, Shum HC (2012) Fluctuation-induced dynamics of multiphase liquid jets with ultra-low interfacial tension. Lab Chip 12(18):3380–3386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skardal A, Shupe T, Atala A (2016) Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling. Drug Discov Today 21(9):1399–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surdo S et al (2018) Cavitation-assisted micromixing for polymeric nanoparticle generation. In: Multidisciplinary digital publishing institute proceedings

  • Utada AS et al (2005) Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device. Science 308(5721):537–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra TT et al (2002) The design of an in-plane compliance structure for microfluidical systems. Sens Actuators B Chem 81(2):377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voyvodic PL, Min D, Baker AB (2012) A multichannel dampened flow system for studies on shear stress-mediated mechanotransduction. Lab Chip 12(18):3322–3330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H et al (2018) Single-cell compressibility quantification for assessing metastatic potential of cancer cells through multi-frequency acoustophoresis. Microfluid Nanofluidics 22(6):68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong I, Ho CM (2009) Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluidics 7(3):291–306

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang B, Lin Q (2009) A compliance-based microflow stabilizer. J Microelectromech Syst 18(3):539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng W et al (2014) Characterization of syringe-pump-driven induced pressure fluctuations in elastic microchannels. Lab Chip 15(4):1110–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CX (2013) Multiphase flow microfluidics for the production of single or multiple emulsions for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(11–12):1420–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, You Z (2015) Microfluidic hydrodynamic focusing for high-throughput applications. J Micromech Microeng 25(12):125006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, You Z (2016) A microflow cytometer with a rectangular quasi-flat-top laser spot. Sensors 16(9):1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, You Z (2018) Spark-generated microbubble cell sorter for microfluidic flow cytometry. Cytom Part A 93(2):222–231

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiahao Zhao.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiao, Z., Zhao, J., Chao, Z. et al. An air-chamber-based microfluidic stabilizer for attenuating syringe-pump-induced fluctuations. Microfluid Nanofluid 23, 26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-019-2193-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-019-2193-2

Navigation