Skip to main content
Log in

Role of polymer concentration and molecular weight on the rebounding behaviors of polymer solution droplet impacting on hydrophobic surfaces

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impacting and rebounding behaviors of droplets containing polyethylene oxide (PEO) on Teflon-coated hydrophobic surface are investigated using a high-speed imaging system. Maximum spreading of droplets are examined experimentally by varying the concentration of polymer solution. During the spreading of droplets, no significant energy dissipation is found in the PEO solution droplets tested in this study. Energy dissipation during the retraction of contact line increases with the increase in the concentration and molecular weight of the polymer. Molecular weight does not show any noticeable effect when the concentration of the polymer solution is lower than 0.03 wt%. Its effect increases when the concentration is higher than 0.03 wt%, and the energy dissipation increases (threefold) at 0.05 wt% concentration. In addition, the residue composed of small satellite droplets is optically observed. The retraction velocity of contact line is decreased on the area of residue, which adds friction on the surface. A semiempirical model of energy balance equation is derived to estimate the rebounding tendency of a polymer solution droplet as a function of maximum spreading factor, retraction velocity, and reduced concentration. The friction coefficient of the polymer solution shows a linear relationship with reduced concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alizadeh A, Bahadur V, Shang W, Zhu Y, Buckley D, Dhinojwala A, Sohal M (2013) Influence of substrate elasticity on droplet impact dynamics. Langmuir 29:4520–4524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An SM, Lee SY (2012) Maximum spreading of a shear-thinning liquid drop impacting on dry solid surfaces. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 38:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade R, Skurtys O, Osorio F (2012a) Experimental study of drop impacts and spreading on epicarps: effect of fluid properties. J Food Eng 109:430–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade RD, Skurtys O, Osorio F (2012b) The impact of liquid drops on purple cabbage leaves (Brassica oleracea l. Var. Capitata). Ing Invest 32:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonini C, Bernagozzi I, Jung S, Poulikakos D, Marengo M (2013) Water drops dancing on ice: how sublimation leads to drop rebound. Phys Rev Lett 111:014501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz SD, Chandra S (2000) Impact, recoil and splashing of molten metal droplets. Int J Heat Mass Tran 43:2841–2857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolo D, Boudaoud A, Narcy G, Bonn D (2007) Dynamics of non-newtonian droplets. Phys Rev Lett 99:174502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron V, Bonn D, Martin JY, Vovelle L (2000) Controlling droplet deposition with polymer additives. Nature 405:772–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertola V (2013) Dynamic wetting of dilute polymer solutions: the case of impacting droplets. Adv Colloid Interfac 193:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertola V (2014) Effect of polymer concentration on the dynamics of dilute polymer solution drops impacting on heated surfaces in the Leidenfrost regime. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 52:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat PP, Appathurai S, Harris MT, Pasquali M, McKinley GH, Basaran OA (2010) Formation of beads-on-a-string structures during break-up of viscoelastic filaments. Nat Phys 6:625–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremond N, Villermaux E (2006) Atomization by jet impact. J Fluid Mech 549:273–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christanti Y, Walker LM (2002) Effect of fluid relaxation time of dilute polymer solutions on jet breakup due to a forced disturbance. J Rheol 46:733–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clanet C, Beguin C, Richard D, Quere D (2004) Maximal deformation of an impacting drop. J Fluid Mech 517:199–208

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clasen C et al (2006) How dilute are dilute solutions in extensional flows? J Rheol 50:849–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks R, Cooper-Whitez J, Boger DV (2001) The role of dynamic surface tension and elasticity on the dynamics of drop impact. Chem Eng Sci 56:5575–5592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Gennes PG (1985) Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 57:827–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggers J, Fontelos MA, Josserand C, Zaleski S (2010) Drop dynamics after impact on a solid wall: theory and simulations. Phys Fluids 22:062101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorchenko AI, Wang AB, Wang YH (2005) Effect of capillary and viscous forces on spreading of a liquid drop impinging on a solid surface. Phys Fluids 17:093104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German G, Bertola V (2009) Review of drop impact models and validation with high-viscosity Newtonian fluids. At Spray 19:787–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy WM, Hartley JG, Abdel-Khalik SI (2001) Surface wetting effects on the spreading of liquid droplets impacting a solid surface at low Weber numbers. Int J Heat Mass Transf 44:235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung S, Hutchings IM (2012) The impact and spreading of a small liquid drop on a non-porous substrate over an extended time scale. Soft Matter 8:2686–2696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung SJ, Hoath SD, Hutchings IM (2013a) The role of viscoelasticity in drop impact and spreading for inkjet printing of polymer solution on a wettable surface. Microfluid Nanofluid 14:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung SJ, Sou A, Gili E, Sirringhaus H (2013b) Inkjet-printed resistors with a wide resistance range for printed read-only memory applications. Org Electron 14:699–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange A, Schindler W, Wegener M, Fostiropoulos K, Janietz S (2013) Inkjet printed solar cell active layers based on a novel, amorphous polymer. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 13:5209–5214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SJ, Huh HK, Kwon DH (2014) Energy dissipation of graphene colloidal suspension droplets impacting on solid substrates. RSC Adv 4:7216–7224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao T, Kuhn DCS, Tran H (1997) Spread and rebound of liquid droplets upon impact on flat surfaces. AIChE J 43:2169–2179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MourougouCandoni N, PrunetFoch B, Legay F, VignesAdler M, Wong K (1997) Influence of dynamic surface tension on the spreading of surfactant solution droplets impacting onto a low-surface-energy solid substrate. J Colloid Interface Sci 192:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rioboo R, Tropea C, Marengo M (2001) Outcomes from a drop impact on solid surfaces. At Spray 11:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Rioboo R, Marengo M, Tropea C (2002) Time evolution of liquid drop impact onto solid, dry surfaces. Exp Fluids 33:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roisman IV, Rioboo R, Tropea C (2002) Normal impact of a liquid drop on a dry surface: model for spreading and receding. Proc Roy Soc A Math Phys 458:1411–1430

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rozhkov A, Prunet-Foch B, Vignes-Adler M (2003) Impact of drops of polymer solutions on small targets. Phys Fluids 15:2006–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secor EB, Prabhumirashi PL, Puntambekar K, Geier ML, Hersam MC (2013) Inkjet printing of high conductivity, flexible graphene patterns. J Phys Chem Lett 4:1347–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MI, Bertola V (2010) Effect of polymer additives on the wetting of impacting droplets. Phys Rev Lett 104:154502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MI, Sharp JS (2014) Origin of contact line forces during the retraction of dilute polymer solution drops. Langmuir 30:5455–5459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son Y, Kim C (2009) Spreading of inkjet droplet of non-Newtonian fluid on solid surface with controlled contact angle at low Weber and Reynolds numbers. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 162:78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirtaatmadja V, McKinley GH, Cooper-White JJ (2006) Drop formation and breakup of low viscosity elastic fluids: effects of molecular weight and concentration. Phys Fluids 18:043101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran T et al (2013) Droplet impact on superheated micro-structured surfaces. Soft Matter 9:3272–3282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukiwe C, Kwok DY (2005) On the maximum spreading diameter of impacting droplets on well-prepared solid surfaces. Langmuir 21:666–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) and funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (Grant No. 2008-0061991). SJ acknowledges support from the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of South Korea under the IT Consilience Creative Program (NIPA-2014-H0201-14-1001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Joon Lee.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 6072 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huh, H.K., Jung, S., Seo, K.W. et al. Role of polymer concentration and molecular weight on the rebounding behaviors of polymer solution droplet impacting on hydrophobic surfaces. Microfluid Nanofluid 18, 1221–1232 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1518-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-014-1518-4

Keywords

Navigation