Skip to main content
Log in

Tracking reactions in microflow

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuous flow microfluidic mixers are a powerful tool for investigating reaction kinetics. However, dispersion of flow speeds and convolution of mixing kinetics and reaction kinetics often limit the temporal resolution. Here, we introduce a method to determine the reaction time for each location of a mixer to analyze dispersion effects. Our approach is based on calculating individual streamlines and following the reaction along them. The results show that varying the flow speed of liquids in the mixer offers a simple way to distinguish the mixing kinetics from the reaction kinetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baroud CN, Okkels F, Menetrier L, Tabeling P (2003) Reaction-diffusion dynamics: confrontation between theory and experiment in a microfluidic reactor. Phys Rev E 67(6):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard DA (2001) Taylor dispersion of a solute in a microfluidic channel. J Appl Phys 89(8):4667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennich ME, Nolting JF, Dammann C, Nöding B, Bauch S, Herrmann H, Pfohl T, Köster S (2011) Dynamics of intermediate filament assembly followed in micro-flow by small angle X-ray scattering. Lab on a Chip 11(4):708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody JP, Yager P, Goldstein RE, Austin RH (1996) Biotechnology at low Reynolds numbers. Biophys J 71(6):3430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann H, Aebi U (1998) Intermediate filament assembly: fibrillogenesis is driven by decisive dimer–dimer interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 8(2):177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismagilov RF, Stroock AD, Kenis PJA, Whitesides G, Stone HA (2000) Experimental and theoretical scaling laws for transverse diffusive broadening in two-phase laminar flows in microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 76(17):2376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight JB, Vishwanath A, Brody JP, Austin RH (1998) Hydrodynamic focusing on a silicon chip: mixing nanoliters in microseconds. Phys Rev Lett 80(17):3863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köster S, Pfohl T (2012) X-ray studies of biological matter in microfluidic environments. Mod Phys Lett B 26(26):1230018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köster S, Evans HM, Wong JY, Pfohl T (2008) An in situ study of collagen self-assembly processes. Biomacromolecules 9(1):199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WJ, Ice GE, Tischler JZ, Khounsary A, Liu C, Assoufid L, Macrander AT (2005) Short focal length Kirkpatrick-Baez mirrors for a hard x-ray nanoprobe. Rev Sci Instrum 76(11):6

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen NT, Wu ZG (2005) Micromixers—a review. J Micromech Microeng 15(2):R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pabit S, Hagen s (2002) Laminar-flow fluid mixer for fast fluorescence kinetics studies. Biophys 83:2872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park HY, Qiu XY, Rhoades E, Korlach J, Kwok LW, Zipfel WR, Webb WW, Pollack L (2006) Achieving uniform mixing in a microfluidic device: hydrodynamic focusing prior to mixing. Anal Chem 78(13):4465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack L, Tate MW, Darnton NC, Knight JB, Gruner SM, Eaton WA, Austin RH (1999) Compactness of the denatured state of a fast-folding protein measured by submillisecond small-angle X-ray scattering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(18):10115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack L, Tate MW, Finnefrock AC, Kalidas C, Trotter S, Darnton NC, Lurio L, Austin RH, Batt CA, Gruner SM, Mochrie SGJ (2001) Time resolved collapse of a folding protein observed with small angle X-ray scattering. Phys Rev Lett 86(21):4962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell R, Millettt IS, Tate MW, Kwok LW, Nakatani B, Gruner SM, Mochrie SGJ, Pande V, Doniach S, Herschlag D, Pollack L (2002) Rapid compaction during RNA folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(7):4266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonnet S, Groisman A (2005) Two-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing in a simple microfluidic device. Appl Phys Lett 87:114104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZG, Nguyen NT (2005a) Rapid mixing using two-phase hydraulic focusing in microchannels. Biomed Microdevices 7(1):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZG, Nguyen NT (2005b) Hydrodynamic focusing in microchannels under consideration of diffusive dispersion: theories and experiments. Sens Actuators B-Chem 107(2):965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZG, Nguyen NT (2005c) Convective–diffusive transport in parallel lamination micromixers. Microfluid Nanofluid 1(3):208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Eberhard Bodenschatz for helpful discussions, Britta Weinhausen and Christian Dammann for proofreading the manuscript and Jan Goemann for technical support. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the framework of SFB 755 “Nanoscale Photonic Imaging” and the Excellence Initiative as well as the Helmholtz Gemeinschaft in the framework of Virtual Institute VH-VI-403 “In-Situ Nano-Imaging of Biological and Chemical Processes”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Köster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brennich, M.E., Köster, S. Tracking reactions in microflow. Microfluid Nanofluid 16, 39–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1212-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1212-y

Keywords

Navigation