Abstract
Effects of dynamic contact angle models on the flow dynamics of an impinging droplet in sharp interface simulations are presented in this article. In the considered finite element scheme, the free surface is tracked using the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach. The contact angle is incorporated into the model by replacing the curvature with the Laplace–Beltrami operator and integration by parts. Further, the Navier-slip with friction boundary condition is used to avoid stress singularities at the contact line. Our study demonstrates that the contact angle models have almost no influence on the flow dynamics of the non-wetting droplets. In computations of the wetting and partially wetting droplets, different contact angle models induce different flow dynamics, especially during recoiling. It is shown that a large value for the slip number has to be used in computations of the wetting and partially wetting droplets in order to reduce the effects of the contact angle models. Among all models, the equilibrium model is simple and easy to implement. Further, the equilibrium model also incorporates the contact angle hysteresis. Thus, the equilibrium contact angle model is preferred in sharp interface numerical schemes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayer IS, Megaridis CM (2006) Contact angle dynamics in droplets impacting on flat surfaces with different wetting characteristics. J Fluid Mech 558:415–449
Bracke M, Voeght FD, Joos P (1989) The kinetics of wetting: the dynamic contact angle. Progr Colloid Polym Sci 79:142–149
Bristeau MO, Glowinski R, Periaux J (1987) Numerical methods for the Navier–Stokes equations. application to the simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Comput Phys 6:73–188
Chen Y, Kulenovic R, Mertz R (2009) Numerical study on the formation of taylor bubbles in capillary tubes. Int J Thermal Sci 48:234–242
Cox RG (1986) The dynamics of the spreading of liquids on a solid surface. Part 1. Viscous flow. J Fluid Mech 168:169–194
Crouzeix M, Raviart PA (1973) Conforming and nonconforming finite element methods for solving the stationary Stokes equations I. RAIRO Anal Numer 7:33–76
Dussan EB (1976) The moving contact line: the slip boundary condition. J Fluid Mech 77(4):665–684
Dussan EB (1979) On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 11:371–400
Dziuk G (1991) An algorithm for evolutionary surfaces. Numer Math 58:603–611
Fukai J, Shiiba Y, Yamamoto T, Miyatake O, Poulikakos D, Megaridis CM, Zhao Z (1995) Wetting effects on the spreading of a liquid droplet colliding with a flat surface: experiment and modeling. Phys Fluids 7(2):236–247
Ganesan S (2006) Finite element methods on moving meshes for free surface and interface flows. PhD Thesis, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Fakultät für Mathematik, Magdeburg
Ganesan S, Tobiska L (2005) Finite element simulation of a droplet impinging a horizontal surface. In: Proceedings of the algoritmy 2005, Slovak Technical University, Bratislava, pp 1–11
Ganesan S, Tobiska L (2008) An accurate finite element scheme with moving meshes for computing 3D-axisymmetric interface flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 57(2):119–138
Ganesan S, Tobiska L (2009) Modelling and simulation of moving contact line problems with wetting effects. Comput Visual Sci 12:329–336
Gennes PGD (1985) Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 57:827–863
Haley PJ, Miksis MJ (1991) The effect of the contact line on droplet spreading. J Fluid Mech 223:57–81
Hocking L (1995) On the contact angels in evaporating liquids. Phys Fluids 7:2950–2955
Hocking LM (1976) A moving fluid interface on a rough surface. J Fluid Mech 76(4):801–817
Hocking LM (1983) The spreading of a thin drop by gravity and capillarity. Q J Mech Appl Math 36:55–69
Hocking LM (1992) Rival contact-angle models and the spreading of drops. J Fluid Mech 239:671–681
Hocking LM, Davis SH (2002) Inertial effects in time-dependent motion of tin films and drops. J Fluid Mech 467:1–17
Hoffman RL (1975) A study of the advancing interface. I. Interface shape in liquid–gas systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 50(2):228–241
Huh C, Scriven LE (1971) Hydrodynamic model of steady movement of a solid/liquid/fluid contact line. J Colloid Interface Sci 35:85–101
Johnson A, Tezduyar T (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 119(1-2):73–94
Kistler SF (1993) Hydrodynamics of wetting. In: Berg J (ed) Wettability. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 311–429
Rannacher R (2004) Incompressible viscous flows. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes T (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, chap 6, vol 3. Wiley,London, pp 155–182
Renardy M, Renardy Y, Li J (2001) Numerical simulation of moving contact line problems using a volume-of-fluid method. J Comput Phys 171:243–263
Saha AA, Mitra SK (2009) Effect of dynamic contact angle in a volume of fluid (VOF) model for a microfluidic capillary flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 339(2):461–480
Schönfeld F, Hardt S (2009) Dynamic contact angles in CFD simulations. Comput Fluids 38(4):757–764
Spelt PDM (2005) A level-set approach for simulations of flows with multiple moving contact lines with hysteresis. J Comput Phys 207:389–404
T-S Jiang OHSG, Slattery JC (1979) Correlation for dynamic contact angle. J Colloid Interface Sci 69:74–77
Turek S (1999) Efficient solvers for incompressible flow problems. An algorithmic and computational approach. Springer, Berlin
Šikalo S, Wilhelm HD, Roisman IV, Jakirlić S, Tropea C (2005) Dynamic contact angle of spreading droplets: Experiments and simulations. Phys Fluids 17(062103):1–13
Wörner M (2012) Numerical modeling of multiphase flows in microfluidics and micro process engineering: a review of methods and applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 12:841–886
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ganesan, S. On the dynamic contact angle in simulation of impinging droplets with sharp interface methods. Microfluid Nanofluid 14, 615–625 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-012-1080-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-012-1080-x