Skip to main content
Log in

Correlations of droplet formation in T-junction microfluidic devices: from squeezing to dripping

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we have systematically analyzed the scaling law of droplet formation by cross-flow shear method in T-junction microfluidic devices. The droplet formation mechanisms can be distinguished by the capillary number for the continuous phase (Cac), which are the squeezing regime (Cac < 0.002), dripping regime (0.01 < Cac < 0.3), and the transient regime (0.002 < Cac< 0.01). Three corresponding correlations have been suggested in the different range of Cac. In the dripping regime, we developed a modified capillary number for the continuous phase (Cac′) by considering the influence of growing droplet size on the continuous phase flow rate. And the modified model could predict droplet diameter more accurately. In the squeezing regime, the final plug length was contributed by the growth and ‘squeeze’ stages based on the observation of dynamic break-up process. In the transient regime, we firstly suggested a mathematical model by considering the influences of the above two mechanisms. The correlations should be very useful for the application of controlling droplet size in T-junction microfluidic devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anna SL, Bontoux N, Stone HA (2003) Formation of dispersions using ‘‘flow focusing’’ in microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 82:364–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristini V, Tan YC (2004) Theory and numerical simulation of droplet dynamics in complex flows–a review. Lab Chip 4:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cygan ZT, Cabral JT, Beers KL, Amis EJ (2005) Microfluidic platform for the generation of organic-phase microreactors. Langmuir 21:3629–3634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garstecki P, Fuerstman MJ, Stonec HA, Whitesides GM (2006) Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction—scaling and mechanism of break-up. Lab Chip 6:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong TY, Shen JY, Hu ZB, Marquez M, Cheng Z (2007) Nucleation rate measurement of colloidal crystallization using microfluidic emulsion droplets. Langmuir 23:2919–2923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husny J, Cooper-White JJ (2006) The effect of elasticity on drop creation in T-shaped microchannels. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 137:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi I, Nakajima M, Chun K, Kikuchi Y, Fujita H (2001) Silicon array of elongated through-holes for monodisperse emulsion droplets. AIChE J 48:1639–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumemura M, Korenaga T (2006) Quantitative extraction using flowing nano-liter droplet in microfluidic system. Anal Chim Acta 558:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menech MD, Garstecki P, Jousse F, Stone HA (2008) Transition from squeezing to dripping in a microfluidic T-shaped junction. J Fluid Mech 595:141–161

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nisisako T, Torii T, Higuchi T (2002) Droplet formation in a microchannel network. Lab Chip 2:24–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisisako T, Torii T, Higuchi T (2004) Novel microreactors for functional polymer beads. Chem Eng J 101:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Tice JD, Ismagilov RF (2003) A microfluidic system for controlling reaction networks in time. Angew Chem Int Ed 42(7):767–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura S, Nakajima M, Seki M (2004) Prediction of droplet diameter for microchannel emulsification: prediction model for complicated microchannel geometries. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:8233–8238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun M, Du WB, Fang Q (2006) Microfluidic liquid–liquid extraction system based on stopped-flow technique and liquid core waveguide capillary. Talanta 70:392–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi M, Maki T, Miyahara M, Mae K (2004) Production of titania nanoparticles by using a new microreactor assembled with same axle dual pipe. Chem Eng J 101:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan J, Xu JH, Li SW, Luo GS (2008) Drop dispenser in a cross-junction microfluidic device: scaling and mechanism of break-up. Chem Eng J 136(2–3):306–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsen T, Roberts R, Arnold F, Quake S (2001) Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys Rev Lett 86:4163–4166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tice JD, Song H, Lyon AD, Ismagilov RF (2003) Formation of droplets and mixing in multiphase microfluidics at low values of the Reynolds and the capillary numbers. Langmuir 19:9127–9133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utada AS, Lorenceau E, Link DR, Kaplan PD, Stone HA, Weitz DA (2005) Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device. Science 308:537–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Nakajima M (2004) The generation of highly monodisperse droplets through the breakup of hydrodynamically focused microthread in a microfluidic device. Appl Phys Lett 85:3726–3728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Nie Z, Seo M, Lewis P, Kumacheva E, Stone HA, Garstechi P, Weibel DB, Gitlin I, Whitesides GM (2005) Generation of monodisperse particles by using microfluidics: control over size, shape, and composition. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:724–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JH, Luo GS, Li SW, Chen GG (2006a) Shear force induced monodisperse droplet formation in a microfluidic device by controlling wetting properties. Lab Chip 6:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JH, Li SW, Tan J, Wang YJ, Luo GS (2006b) Preparation of highly monodisperse droplet in a T-junction microfluidic device. AIChE J 52(9):3005–3010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JH, Li SW, Tan J, Wang YJ, Luo GS (2006c) Controllable preparation of monodisperse O/W and W/O emulsions in the same microfluidic device. Langmuir 22(19):7943–7946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagishita T, Tomabechi Y, Nishio K, Masuda H (2004) Preparation of monodisperse SiO2 nanoparticles by membrane emulsification using ideally ordered anodic porous alumina. Langmuir 20:554–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng B, Tice JD, Roach LS, Ismagilov RF (2004) A droplet-based, composite PDMS/glass capillary microfluidic system for evaluating protein crystallization conditions by microbatch and vapor-diffusion methods with on-chip X-ray diffraction. Angew Chem Int Ed 43:2508–2511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C, Yue P, Feng JJ (2006) Formation of simple and compound drops in microfluidic devices. Phys Fluids 18(092105):1–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20490200, 20525622) and National Basic Research Program of China (2007CB714302) on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to J. H. Xu or G. S. Luo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, J.H., Li, S.W., Tan, J. et al. Correlations of droplet formation in T-junction microfluidic devices: from squeezing to dripping. Microfluid Nanofluid 5, 711–717 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0306-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0306-4

Keywords

Navigation