Abstract
This work characterizes microfluidic mixers fabricated using soft lithography without grooves or with grooves on the top and/or bottom of the channels. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether grooves on the top and bottom of the channel significantly improve mixing in microfluidic systems. The channels studied were 200 μm wide with repeating sets of alternating patterns of diagonal stripes and chevrons. The study employed confocal microscopy to investigate the mixing of a 0.1 wt% fluorescein solution with a deionized water solution. The results of the study indicate a 10% improvement in mixing over systems with grooves only on the top of the channel.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Howell PB, Mott DR, Fertig S, Kaplan C, Golden JP, Oran ES, Ligler FS (2005) A microfluidic mixer with grooves placed on the top and bottom of the channel. Lab Chip 5:524–530
Jo B, Van Lerberghe LM, Motsegood KM, Beebe DJ (2000) Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer. J Microelectromech Syst 9:76–81
Johnson TJ, Ross D, Locascio LE (2002) Rapid microfluidic mixing. Anal Chem 74:45–51
Kim DS, Lee SW, Kwon TH Lee SS (2004) A barrier embedded chaotic micromixer. J Micromech Microeng 14:798–805
Stroock AD, Dertinger KW, Ajdari A, Mezic I, Stone HA, Whitesides GM (2002) Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 295:647–651
Whitesides GM, Stroock AD (2001) Flexible methods for microfluidics. Phys Today 54:42
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the Office of Naval Research for a summer faculty fellowship and Thomas O’Shaughnessy for technical assistance. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinion or policy of the US government, the US Navy, or the US Department of Defense.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Floyd-Smith, T., Golden, J., Howell, P. et al. Characterization of passive microfluidic mixers fabricated using soft lithography. Microfluid Nanofluid 2, 180–183 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-005-0060-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-005-0060-9