Abstract
Before breast cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and biopsy using blue dye, radioisotope (RI) with a gamma probe, or a combination of the two are mainly performed. The dye-guided method requires skilled technique to make an incision in the skin and identify SLNs without damaging the lymphatic vessels. In addition, dye-induced anaphylactic shock has been reported. To use the γ-probe-guided method, the facility must be able to handle RI. However, to overcome the drawbacks of these methods, Omoto et al. developed a new identification modality using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with an ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) in 2002. Since then, many basic experiments and clinical studies using various UCA have been reported. In particular, a number of studies in SLN detection using Sonazoid have been reported and are herein reviewed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a relatively simple and safe examination compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and it is performed in various aspects of breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. In addition to discrimination of benign from malignant tumors, it has also been used for the evaluation of tumor spread and response to therapy. Identification and biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are routinely performed as a preoperative examination for breast cancer. In Japan, SLN detection methods using dyes or radioisotopes in breast cancer are covered by insurance, but the use of ultrasound contrast agents is not. Many studies have been performed using CEUS as one of the modalities in SLN detection. Here we review the literature including our own studies.
Basic research on SLN identification using CEUS
There have been many basic research studies of SLN identification with radiological methods (e.g., scintigraphy), but a novel method using CEUS with an ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) was developed by Omoto et al. in 2002 [1]. They reported that when 25% albumin was injected into a pig's neck, contrast-enhanced regional lymph nodes (LNs) were visualized and SLNs could be identified. In 2004, Goldberg et al. [2] reported SLN detection using CEUS with Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) in swine models of melanoma. The enhanced LNs and lymphatic channels were also visualized by using CEUS with Sonazoid, and the accuracy of SLN detection was 90%.
In 2006, Omoto et al. [3] reported a new method consisting of a combination of hydroxyethylated starch as the UCA and 5% patent blue violet in swine models. The regional LNs were easily found on CEUS, and blue-stained LNs could be detected after the skin was cut at the site where ultrasound had shown they would be.
In 2006, Lurie et al. [4] reported a CEUS detection method for SLN with a microbubble contrast medium (Definity; Lantheus Medical Imaging, Massachusetts, USA). After it was injected into peritumoral tissue in 10 dogs with spontaneous head or neck tumors, regional LNs were imaged up to 20 min after contrast administration using power Doppler US.
In 2009, Wang et al. [5] reported gray-scale CEUS was performed in 12 rabbits with breast VX2 tumors after subcutaneous administration of SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy). The sensitivity of CEUS for detecting SLNs was 89.5% (17/19). Among the 17 SLNs detected on CEUS, tumor metastases were identified histopathologically in four SLNs, whereas proliferation of lymphatic tissue was identified in the other 13 SLNs.
In 2015, Kogashiwa et al. [6] reported a tracer mixture of Sonazoid and indocianine green (ICG) for SLN detection. After it was injected into the tongue, larynx, and oropharynx and hypopharynx, the enhanced LNs could be transcutaneously identified in eight rabbits and four swines on CEUS. On the other hand, the SLNs could also be detected with ICG fluorescence using the Hyper Eye Medical System (HEMS).
Animal studies of SLN detection using CEUS with a UCA are summarized in Table 1.
Clinical study of SLN identification in breast cancer and other cancers
Breast cancer
In 2006, Omoto et al. [7] first reported that SLNs could be identified with CEUS in breast cancer patients. CEUS using 25% albumin as a UCA was performed in 23 breast cancer patients, and enhanced LNs were identified in all.
In 2009, Omoto et al. [8] (24) reported CEUS with Sonazoid in a breast cancer patient. They then published the results of a preliminary clinical study on SLN detection using CEUS with subareolar Sonazoid injection in 20 breast cancer patients, in which the sensitivity of CEUS was 70%. In 2011, Omoto et al. [9] reported a further investigation of SLN identification with Sonazoid. A total of 181 breast cancer patients from four institutions were enrolled. After subareolar Sonazoid injection (Fig. 1), one or two contrast-enhanced LNs were detected in 166 of the 181 patients, with each taking 2 to 20 min to detect. Various flow patterns of lymphatic vessels (Fig. 2a–c) and contrast-enhanced SLNs (Fig. 3a, b) were shown.
In 2009, Sever et al. [10] reported that the overall sensitivity of CEUS-based SLN detection with SonoVue injected periareolarly was 89% (48 of 54 patients).
In 2017, Shimazu et al. [11] reported a feasibility study conducted at three hospitals. They showed that contrast-enhanced lymphatic vessels and SLNs were clearly visualized and easily identified with a detection rate of 98% (98/100) after Sonazoid injection periareolarly.
Malignant melanoma
In 2009, Rue Nielsen et al. [12] reported subcutaneous injection of SonoVue on both sides of the scar from the excised tumor in ten malignant melanoma patients, but two contrast-enhanced inguinal LNs were visualized on CEUS in only one patient (10%).
Oral and otopharyngeal cancer
In 2019, Wakisaka et al. [13] reported the successful detection of SLNs in 8 out of 10 cases after Sonazoid injection into the mucosa at the primary site in head and neck cancer patients (6 oral and 4 otopharyngeal cancers).
Clinical studies of SLN detection using CEUS in malignant cancer patients are presented in Table 2.
Discussion
The SLN hypothesis states that tumor cells that are shed from a primary carcinoma migrate through a lymphatic channel to a single lymph node prior to the involvement of the remaining lymph nodes within that basin. Therefore, SLN identification and analysis for tumor involvement may predict the status of the remaining lymph nodes and provide important information preoperatively.
Much basic research in various fields has been reported in relation to SLN identification. In 1977, Cabanas et al. [14] reported inguinal lymphangiography, which is a radiological method, which confirmed the flow of contrast media into the SLN in penile cancer.
In 1992, Morton et al. [15] reported SLN detection and biopsy using the dye method in a clinical study of malignant melanoma. In breast cancer studies, Krag et al. [16] reported SLN biopsy using the radioisotope (RI) method with a gamma probe in 1993, and Giuliano et al. [17] reported the use of the dye method during surgery in 1994. Since then, these methods have been widely adopted all over the world.
Currently, SLN detection and biopsy using blue dye, RI with a gamma probe, or their combination have been performed in breast cancer with high identification rates [18]. However, anaphylactic reactions to the dye have rarely been reported [19, 20]. The radioisotope method usually requires more than several hours to detect SLNs after radioactive colloid is injected, leading to radiation protection problems.
In 2002, we developed and proposed a new identification method using a UCA to overcome these drawbacks. Initially, Omoto et al. [1] demonstrated its usefulness in animal experiments using 25% albumin solution as a UCA and obtained good results in a preliminary clinical study in breast cancer patients [7]. However, 25% albumin produced from human serum has been limited in use due to the risk of infection, and for this reason its use has not become widespread.
Starting with this 25% albumin solution [1, 7], many kinds of UCA such as hydroxyethylated starch [3], SonoVue [5, 21, 22], Sonazoid [2, 8, 9, 23], and Definity [4] have been utilized. With respect to SLN identification investigations using UCAs conducted in the last two decades, animal experiments are shown in Table 1 and clinical studies are shown in Table 2.
Among these UCAs, studies using Sonazoid have shown particularly good results in terms of SLN detection rates. The active ingredient of Sonazoid is perflubutane microbubbles, which have a long lifespan in the body because of chemical stability.
In addition to breast cancer, studies using SonoVue for malignant melanoma of the skin [12] and studies using Sonazoid for oropharyngeal cancer in the head and neck [13] have been reported. SLN detection with Sonazoid has shown a high identification rate in head and neck surgery, and it is also expected to be utilized in cancers other than breast cancer. Because CEUS is an imaging technique for detecting lymphatic channels and SLNs, it may be one of the most effective, versatile, and promising identification methods for SLNs.
Change history
23 August 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-024-01493-1
References
Omoto K, Mizunuma H, Ogura S, et al. New method of sentinel node identification with ultrasonography using albumin as contrast agent: a study in pigs. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28:1115–22.
Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Liu JB, et al. Sentinel lymph nodes in a swine model with melanoma: contrast-enhanced lymphatic US. Radiology. 2004;30:727–34.
Omoto K, Hozumi Y, Nihei Y, et al. New method of sentinel node detection using a combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dye guidance: an animal study. J Med Ultrason. 2006;33:153–8.
Lurie DM, Seguin B, Schneider PD, et al. Contrast-assisted ultrasound for sentinel lymph node detection in spontaneously arising canine head and neck tumors. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:415–21.
Wang Y, Wang W, Li J, et al. Gray-scale contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of sentinel lymph nodes in a metastatic breast cancer model. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:957–62.
Kogashiwa Y, Sakurai H, Akimoto Y, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for the head and neck using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography combined with Indocyanine Green fluorescence in animal models: a feasibility study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0132511.
Omoto K, Hozumi Y, Omoto Y, et al. Sentinel node detection in breast cancer using contrast-enhanced sonography with 25% albumin–initial clinical experience. J Clin Ultrasound. 2006;34:317–26.
Omoto K, Matsunaga H, Take N, et al. Sentinel node detection method using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid in breast cancer: preliminary clinical study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1249–56.
Omoto K, Futsuhara K, Sekine O, et al. Sentinel node identification method using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid injected subareolarly in breast cancer: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:S102.
Sever A, Jones S, Cox K, et al. Preoperative localization of sentinel lymph nodes using intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1295–9.
Shimazu K, Ito T, Uji K, et al. Identification of sentinel lymph nodes by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid in patients with breast cancer: a feasibility study in three hospitals. Cancer Med. 2017;6:1915–22.
Rue Nielsen K, Klyver H, Hougaard Chakera A, et al. Sentinel node detection in melanomas using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:412–7.
Wakisaka N, Endo K, Kitazawa T, et al. Detection of sentinel lymph node using contrast-enhanced agent, Sonazoid, and evaluation of its metastasis with superb microvascular imaging in oral and oropharyngeal cancers: a preliminary clinical study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019;139:94–9.
Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer. 1977;39:456–66.
Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992;127:392–9.
Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol. 1993;2:335–40.
Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:391–401.
Hill AD, Tran KN, Akhurst T, et al. Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1999;229:528–35.
Rodier J, Janser J. Surgical technical details improving sentinel node identification in breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 1997;4:281–3.
Cimmino VM, Brown AC, Szocik JF, et al. Allergic reactions to isosulfan blue during sentinel node biopsy –a common event. Surgery. 2001;130:439–42.
Sever AR, Mills P, Jones SE, et al. Preoperative sentinel node identification with ultrasound using microbubbles in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:251–6.
Wang Y, Cheng Z, Li J, et al. Gray-scale contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in detecting sentinel lymph nodes: an animal study. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74:e55–9.
Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Liu JB, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of sentinel lymph nodes after peritumoral administration of Sonazoid in a melanoma tumor animal model. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:441–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective open access order.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Omoto, K., Futsuhara, K. & Watanabe, T. Sentinel lymph node identification using contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer: review of the literature. J Med Ultrasonics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01313-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01313-y