Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is the unaffected eye really unaffected? Color Doppler ultrasound findings in unilaterally active central serous chorioretinopathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate ocular hemodynamic changes using color Doppler ultrasonography imaging (CDI) with an emphasis on unaffected eyes of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with active CSC and 25 controls were analyzed using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and CDI for choroidal imaging and evaluation of retrobulbar vessels, respectively.

Results

Resistive index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) of the ophthalmic artery (OA) and PSV, end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and mean velocity (Vmean) of the central retinal artery (CRA) in the patient group were less than those in the control group. RI and PI of the CRA were greater in the patient group compared to the control group. RI, PI, PSV, and Vmean of the OA and PSV, EDV, and Vmean of the CRA in the patients’ unaffected eyes were less than those in the control group. OCT measurements of central choroidal thickness (CCT) of the affected eyes in the patient group were significantly greater than those of the unaffected eyes in the patient and control groups; that of the unaffected eyes was greater than that in the control group.

Conclusions

Hemodynamic changes in OA reflect choroidal hyperperfusion. Hemodynamic and OCT changes in the unaffected eyes of the patient group suggest CSC as a bilateral disorder and the systemic nature of the disease. Further investigations may aid in the evaluation of treatment response and the follow-up of disease, providing a new insight into management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salehi M, Wenick AS, Law HA, et al. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD011841.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saito M, Saito W, Hirooka K, et al. Pulse waveform changes in macular choroidal hemodynamics with regression of acute central serous chorioretinopathy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:6515–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tittl M, Maar N, Polska E, et al. Choroidal hemodynamic changes during isometric exercise in patients with inactive central serous chorioretinopathy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4717–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haimovici R, Koh S, Gagnon DR, et al. Risk factors for central serous chorioretinopathy: a case–control study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:244–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tittl MK, Spaide RF, Wong D, et al. Systemic findings associated with central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:63–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liegl R, Ulbig MW. Central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmologica. 2014;232:65–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Imamura Y, Fujiwara T, Margolis R, et al. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2009;29:1469–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim YT, Kang SW, Bai KH. Choroidal thickness in both eyes of patients with unilaterally active central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye. 2011;25:1635–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Erol MK, Çoban DT, Toslak D, et al. Bilateral choroidal thickness of patients with unilaterally active central serous chorioretinopathy. Retin Vitr. 2015;23:321–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chung YR, Kim JW, Kim SW, et al. Choroidal thickness in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2016;36:1652–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Imamura Y, Fujiwara T, Margolis R, et al. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2009;29:1469–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitaya N, Nagaoka T, Hikichi T, et al. Features of abnormal choroidal circulation in central serous chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:709–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamidi C, Turkcu FM, Goya C, et al. Evaluation of retrobulbar blood flow with color doppler ultrasonography in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014;42:481–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang P, Wang HY, Zhang ZF, et al. Fundus autofluorescence in central serous chorioretinopathy: association with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:1003–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu S, Huang S, Lin Z, et al. Color Doppler imaging analysis of ocular blood flow velocities in normal tension glaucoma patients: a meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:919610.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicholson B, Noble J, Forooghian F, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy: update on pathophysiology and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58:103–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Akyol M, Erol MK, Ozdemir O, et al. A novel mutation of sgk-1 gene in central serous chorioretinopathy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:23–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyerle CB, Spaide RF. Central serous chorioretinopathy in Albert & Jakobiec’s principles & practice of ophthalmology. 3rd ed. In: Daniel M, Albert MD, Joan MS, et al., editors. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. p. 1871–80.

  19. Maumenee AE. Macular diseases: clinical manifestations. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1965;69:605–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shin JY, Choi HJ, Lee J, et al. Fundus autofluorescence findings in central serous chorioretinopathy using two different confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopes: correlation with functional and structural status. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254:1537–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Belden CJ, Abbitt PL, Beadles KA, et al. Color Doppler US of the orbit. Radiographics. 1995;15:589–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tranquart F, Bergès O, Koskas P, et al. Color Doppler imaging of orbital vessels: personal experience and literature review. J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;31:258–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koç M, Deniz N, Serhatlioğlu S. Akut Santral Seröz Korioretinopatide Renkli Doppler Ultrasonografi ile Orbital Akım Parametrelerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Firat Tip Dergisi. 2008;13:120–2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nurettin UD, Mustafa KOC. Akut santral seröz korioretinopatide kısa posterior silier arter akım parametreleri. Retin Vitr. 2007;15:47–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Delaey C, Van De Voorde J. Regulatory mechanisms in the retinal and choroidal circulation. Ophthalmic Res. 2000;32:249–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Erol MK, Balkarli A, Toslak D, et al. Evaluation of nailfold videocapillaroscopy in central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254:1889–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marmor M, Tan Y. Central serous chorioretinopathy: bilateral multifocal electroretinographic abnormalities. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iclal Erdem Toslak.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was NOT supported by any foundation organization. No sponsor played a role in the design or conduct of this research.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants of this study.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erdem Toslak, I., Erol, M.K., Toslak, D. et al. Is the unaffected eye really unaffected? Color Doppler ultrasound findings in unilaterally active central serous chorioretinopathy. J Med Ultrasonics 44, 173–181 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-016-0762-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-016-0762-5

Keywords

Navigation