Skip to main content
Log in

Three cases of angiomyolipoma: diagnostic imaging by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the Sonazoid microbubble contrast agent to diagnose three cases of hepatic angiomyolipoma, which is a rare benign tumor. Some characteristic findings are obtained in the early vascular phase, for example fork-like tumor vessels. However, a variety of findings are seen after the early vascular phase because of microbubbles circulating the vascular enriched tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

References

  1. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. World health organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000. 193 pp.

  2. Goodman ZD, Ishak KG. Angiomyolipoma of the liver. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984;8:745–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Forsberg F, Piccoli CW, Liu JB, et al. Hepatic tumor detection: MR imaging and conventional US versus pulse-inversion harmonic US of NC100100 during its reticuloendothelial system-specific phase. Radiology. 2002;222:824–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kindberg GM, Tolleshaug H, Roos N, et al. Hepatic clearance of Sonazoid perfluorobutane microbubbles by Kupffer cells does not reduce the ability of liver to phagocytose or degrade albumin microspheres. Cell Tissue Res. 2003;312:49–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, et al. Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe R, Matsumura M, Munemasa T, et al. Mechanism of hepatic parenchyma specific contrast of microbubble-based contrast agent for ultrasonography: microscopic studies in rat liver. Investig Radiol. 2007;42:643–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al. Computed body tomography with MRI correlation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998. p. 858–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hatanaka K, Kudo M, Minami Y, et al. Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors: value of contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography using the newly developed contrast agent, Sonazoid. Intervirology. 2008;51:61–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng RQ, Kudo M, Ishikawa E, et al. Hepatic angiomyolipoma: identification of an efferent vessel as a hepatic vein by contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography. J Med Ultrason. 2005;32:191–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yen YH, Wang JH, Lu SN, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in hepatic angiomyolipoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:855–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiao W, Zhou M, Lou H, et al. Hemodynamic characterization of hepatic angiomyolipoma with least amount of fat evaluated by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Abdom Imaging. 2009. doi:10.1007/s00261-009-9508-9.

  12. Jeon TY, Kim SH, Lim HK, et al. Assessment of triple-phase CT findings for the differentiation of fat-deficient hepatic angiomyolipoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver. Eur J Radiol. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.010.

  13. Iijima H, Sasaki S, Moriyasu F, et al. Dynamic US contrast study of the liver: vascular and delayed parenchymal phase. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yayoi Yamamoto.

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamoto, Y., Fujiwara, Y., Yukisawa, S. et al. Three cases of angiomyolipoma: diagnostic imaging by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. J Med Ultrasonics 37, 67–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-009-0250-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-009-0250-2

Keywords

Navigation