Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the relationship between the degree of hydronephrosis and the detection rates of ureteral stones with ultrasonography (US).
Methods
Of 250 consecutive patients with suspected ureterolithiasis, 214 who were diagnosed with ureterolithiasis were enrolled in this study. First, both kidneys were observed by US to evaluate the intrarenal collecting systems. Thereafter, the possible course of the ureters and the bladder were searched to find any stones.
Results
Stones were clearly observed in 80 (73%) of 109 patients with caliceal dilatation, whereas stones were clearly observed in 46 (44%) of 105 patients without dilatation (P < 0.05). Of the former 80 patients, 31 (39%) had stones in the ureterovesical junction (UVJ), whereas 51 (64%) had stones in the more proximal ureter. Of the latter 46 patients, 37 (80%) had stones in the UVJ or the bladder, whereas 9 (20%) had stones in the more proximal ureter.
Conclusion
The US detection rate of ureteral stones was high in patients with caliceal dilatation. The whole ureter should be scanned in patients with caliceal dilatation for detection of ureteral stones. Even when patients have no caliceal dilatation, it is still considered to be useful to scan the UVJ and the bladder.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP. Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology. 2003;228:319–29.
Smith RC, Levine J, Dalrymple NC, et al. Acute flank pain: a modern approach to diagnosis and management. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1999;20:108–35.
Erwin BC, Carroll BA, Sommer FG. Renal colic: the role of ultrasound in initial evaluation. Radiology. 1984;152:147–50.
Lanig FC, Jeffrey RB Jr, Wing VW. Ultrasound versus excretory urography in evaluating acute flank pain. Radiology. 1985;154:613–6.
Aslaksen A, Göthlin JH. Ultrasonic diagnosis of ureteral calculi in patients with acute flank pain. Eur J Radiol. 1990;11:87–90.
Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:212–7.
Rosen CL, Brown DF, Sagarin MJ, et al. Ultrasonography by emergency physicians in patients with suspected ureteral colic. J Emerg Med. 1998;16:865–70.
Sheafor DH, Hertzberg BS, Freed KS, et al. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology. 2000;217:792–7.
Ripollés T, Agramunt M, Errando J, et al. Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:129–36.
Kartal M, Eray O, Erdogru T, et al. Prospective validation of a current algorithm including bedside US performed by emergency physicians for patients with acute flank pain suspected for renal colic. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:341–4.
Patlas M, Farkas A, Fisher D, et al. Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:901–4.
Dalla PL, Stacul F, Bazzocchi M, et al. Ultrasonography and plain film versus intravenous urography in ureteric colic. Clin Radiol. 1993;47:333–6.
Fowler KA, Locken JA, Duchesne JH, et al. US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology. 2002;222:109–13.
Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings. AJR. 1996;166:1319–22.
Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, et al. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1998;159:735–40.
Assi Z, Platt JF, Francis IR, et al. Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up. AJR. 2000;175:333–7.
Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR. 2002;178:101–3.
Yoshida O, Terai A, Ohkawa T, et al. National trend of the incidence of urolithiasis in Japan from 1965 to 1995. Kidney Int. 1999;56:1899–904.
Terai A, Okada Y, Ohkawa T, et al. Changes in the incidence of lower urinary tract stones in Japan from 1965 to 1995. Int J Urol. 2000;7:452–6.
Middleton WD, Kurtz AB, Hertzberg BS. Ultrasound: the requisites. St Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 103–51.
Swadan S, Mandavia D. Renal. In: Ma OJ, Mateer JR, Blaivas M, editors. Emergency ultrasound. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008. p. 229–56.
Kabalin JN. Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneum, kidneys, and ureters. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, et al., editors. Campbell’s urology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. p. 3–40.
Lee JY, Kim SH, Cho JY, et al. Color and power Doppler twinkling artifacts from urinary stones: clinical observations and phantom studies. AJR. 2001;176:1441–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Kameda, T., Kawai, F., Taniguchi, N. et al. Ultrasonography for ureteral stone detection in patients with or without caliceal dilatation. J Med Ultrasonics 37, 9–14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-009-0243-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-009-0243-1