Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasonography for ureteral stone detection in patients with or without caliceal dilatation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the relationship between the degree of hydronephrosis and the detection rates of ureteral stones with ultrasonography (US).

Methods

Of 250 consecutive patients with suspected ureterolithiasis, 214 who were diagnosed with ureterolithiasis were enrolled in this study. First, both kidneys were observed by US to evaluate the intrarenal collecting systems. Thereafter, the possible course of the ureters and the bladder were searched to find any stones.

Results

Stones were clearly observed in 80 (73%) of 109 patients with caliceal dilatation, whereas stones were clearly observed in 46 (44%) of 105 patients without dilatation (P < 0.05). Of the former 80 patients, 31 (39%) had stones in the ureterovesical junction (UVJ), whereas 51 (64%) had stones in the more proximal ureter. Of the latter 46 patients, 37 (80%) had stones in the UVJ or the bladder, whereas 9 (20%) had stones in the more proximal ureter.

Conclusion

The US detection rate of ureteral stones was high in patients with caliceal dilatation. The whole ureter should be scanned in patients with caliceal dilatation for detection of ureteral stones. Even when patients have no caliceal dilatation, it is still considered to be useful to scan the UVJ and the bladder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP. Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology. 2003;228:319–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith RC, Levine J, Dalrymple NC, et al. Acute flank pain: a modern approach to diagnosis and management. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1999;20:108–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erwin BC, Carroll BA, Sommer FG. Renal colic: the role of ultrasound in initial evaluation. Radiology. 1984;152:147–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lanig FC, Jeffrey RB Jr, Wing VW. Ultrasound versus excretory urography in evaluating acute flank pain. Radiology. 1985;154:613–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aslaksen A, Göthlin JH. Ultrasonic diagnosis of ureteral calculi in patients with acute flank pain. Eur J Radiol. 1990;11:87–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:212–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen CL, Brown DF, Sagarin MJ, et al. Ultrasonography by emergency physicians in patients with suspected ureteral colic. J Emerg Med. 1998;16:865–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheafor DH, Hertzberg BS, Freed KS, et al. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology. 2000;217:792–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ripollés T, Agramunt M, Errando J, et al. Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:129–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kartal M, Eray O, Erdogru T, et al. Prospective validation of a current algorithm including bedside US performed by emergency physicians for patients with acute flank pain suspected for renal colic. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:341–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patlas M, Farkas A, Fisher D, et al. Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:901–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalla PL, Stacul F, Bazzocchi M, et al. Ultrasonography and plain film versus intravenous urography in ureteric colic. Clin Radiol. 1993;47:333–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fowler KA, Locken JA, Duchesne JH, et al. US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology. 2002;222:109–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings. AJR. 1996;166:1319–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, et al. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1998;159:735–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Assi Z, Platt JF, Francis IR, et al. Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up. AJR. 2000;175:333–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR. 2002;178:101–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshida O, Terai A, Ohkawa T, et al. National trend of the incidence of urolithiasis in Japan from 1965 to 1995. Kidney Int. 1999;56:1899–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Terai A, Okada Y, Ohkawa T, et al. Changes in the incidence of lower urinary tract stones in Japan from 1965 to 1995. Int J Urol. 2000;7:452–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Middleton WD, Kurtz AB, Hertzberg BS. Ultrasound: the requisites. St Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 103–51.

  21. Swadan S, Mandavia D. Renal. In: Ma OJ, Mateer JR, Blaivas M, editors. Emergency ultrasound. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008. p. 229–56.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kabalin JN. Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneum, kidneys, and ureters. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, et al., editors. Campbell’s urology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. p. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JY, Kim SH, Cho JY, et al. Color and power Doppler twinkling artifacts from urinary stones: clinical observations and phantom studies. AJR. 2001;176:1441–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toru Kameda.

About this article

Cite this article

Kameda, T., Kawai, F., Taniguchi, N. et al. Ultrasonography for ureteral stone detection in patients with or without caliceal dilatation. J Med Ultrasonics 37, 9–14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-009-0243-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-009-0243-1

Keywords

Navigation