Introduction

Since December 2019, an outbreak of unexplained pneumonia in Wuhan, China, has spread rapidly to other provinces in China and around the world (Chen et al. 2020; Holshue et al. 2020). Studies have indicated that it is a novel coronavirus pneumonia, which was named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As of February 24, 2020, the total number of patients has risen sharply to 77,262 in China, with 2595 (3.2%) who have died. The main diagnosis method is the pathogenic results obtained by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), which proved to be highly homologous with known genetic sequencing. However, the positivity rate is 30–50%, due to the influence of individual factors, the onset time, and specimen collection. It is very important to discover the specific information characterizing critically ill patients (Chung et al. 2020; Xie et al. 2020). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Methods

All of the COVID-19 cases in this study came from the Liyuan Hospital intensive care unit (ICU) of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, during the period January 16, 2020 to February 20, 2020.

According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) interim guidance, a severely ill patient is defined as one with any of the following symptoms:

  1. 1.

    Respiratory distress, respiratory rate (RR) acuity of 30 breaths/min.

  2. 2.

    Oxygen saturation during resting state of 93% or less.

  3. 3.

    Arterial blood oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/(FiO2) ≤ 300 mmHg (high-altitude region (more than 1000 m above sea level, according to the following formula for correction: PaO2/FiO2 × 760 (mmHg)/atmosphere)).

Critically ill patients are defined as those with any of the characteristics:

  1. 1.

    Respiratory failure and need for mechanical ventilation.

  2. 2.

    Shock.

  3. 3.

    Combination of failure of other organ functions, followed by the need for ICU admission.

We collected data on age, sex, underlying diseases (chronic pulmonary disease, chronic cardiac disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, etc), symptoms, vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, etc.), and laboratory values (blood, routine urine test, liver function, renal function, electrolyte and myocardial enzymes, troponin, coagulation function, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and serum amylase A (SAA)).

Results

Among the COVID-19 patients, there were 11 males and 8 females. Their median (range) age was 73 (38–91) years. Of these patients, 8 (42.1%) died and the median duration from ICU admission to death was 2 (interquartile range (IQR): 1–10.75) days. Fifteen (78.9%) patients had underlying diseases, mainly high blood pressure or diabetes. Seven of the patients who died had underlying diseases. All of the patients were citizens of Wuhan, China, and had no history of contact with COVID-19 (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population

Clinical manifestations included fever (13/19, 68.4%), dry cough (3/19, 15.8%), dyspnea (2/19, 10.5%), and diarrhea (1/19, 5.3%). Seven patients were treated by intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Auxiliary examination showed that all 19 cases (100%) showed ground-glass changes on chest computed tomography (CT). The clinical laboratory indices were as follows: the infection indices (hs-CRP and SAA) were clearly increased in all 19 cases; there were 16 cases (84.2%) in which the total number of lymphocytes decreased; 12 cases (63%) had decreased liver function; 11 cases (58%) had deviant results for fibrinogen (FIB) and D-dimer, in particular, the increase in the D-dimer level was significantly higher among the non-survivors (n = 8, 100%) compared to the survivors (n = 11, 27%); 9 cases (47%) had deviant levels of cardiac muscle enzymes and troponin T (Table 2).

Table 2 Symptoms and clinical laboratory index results of critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

Discussion

At present, there are no specific drugs for COVID-19, only general supportive therapy and treatment in isolation. For mildly ill patients, the infection usually clears spontaneously. Nevertheless, severe illnesses develop easily, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple system organ failure, or even death. In this study, more men than women and more older than younger individuals made up the group of critically ill patients, and the median (range) age of the 19 patients was 73 (38–91) years. Eight (42.1%) patients died and the median duration from ICU admission to death was 2 (IQR: 1–10.75) days. These results suggest that sex and age are affecting the risk factors. Patients with a history of underlying disease (high blood pressure or diabetes) are at increased risk of becoming critically ill or dying if they have the COVID-19 infection. These findings are consistent with previous reports (Chen et al. 2020; Huang et al. 2020). The susceptibility of a population to infection by this new virus drives the dynamics of a pandemic. The clinical manifestations include fever, fatigue, and dry cough without phlegm. A few patients have nasal congestion, runny nose, sore throat, and diarrhea (Cui et al.2019; Zhu et al. 2020). Critically ill patients were more vulnerable to dyspnea, hypoxemia, and even ARDS, irreformable metabolic acidosis, sepsis, and coagulation disturbance after just one week (Wang et al. 2020). Our study found that the severely ill patients went to the hospital early, at the first signs of symptoms of fever and cough, and the time from showing symptoms to ICU admission was 6.4 days. At the ICU, 18 cases (94.7%) developed ARDS rapidly.

In regards to the laboratory tests, all 19 cases (100%) showed ground-glass changes on chest CT. The vast majority of these clinical laboratory indices changed significantly: the hs-CRP and SAA were clearly increased in all 19 cases (100%); 9 cases (47%) had deviant levels of cardiac muscle enzymes and troponin T; 12 cases (63%) had decreased liver function; 11 cases (58%) had deviant results for FIB and D-dimer, in particular, the increase in the D-dimer level was significantly higher among the non-survivors (n = 8, 100%) compared to the survivors (n = 11, 27%). This suggested that the D-dimer level can be used to monitor change in the condition of severely ill patients (Fig. 1). There were 16 (84.2%) cases in which the total number of lymphocytes decreased, which may prompt the theory that COVID-19 infects cells of the human immune system, destroying or impairing their function.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of the D-dimer levels among non-survivors and survivors. *p < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney U-test)

Previous studies showed that the coronavirus can induce the body to produce oxidative stress and release a large amount of active oxygen free radicals, which can, on one hand, make the virus replicate unceasingly, but, on the other hand, the excessive free radicals can damage the body’s biological membrane lipid peroxidation, enzyme, amino acid, and oxidative protein, leading to injury to the organs, such as the lung, heart, liver, kidney, etc. (Li et al 2016; Honce and Schultz-Cherry 2019; Li et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2019).

COVID-19 belongs to the group of viruses which can easily mutate during the process of RNA replication. As a result, we suspect that the new coronavirus in patients with multiple organ function damage is most likely related to this group. In regards to imaging aspects, 19 cases (100%) showed ground-glass changes on chest CT, which is the best tool to use to evaluate the imaging signs for early diagnosis.

In conclusion, to analyze the clinical features of patients with COVID-19, we found that sex and age are affecting the risk factors. Patients with a history of underlying disease (high blood pressure or diabetes) are at increased risk of becoming critically ill or dying if they have the COVID-19 infection. Chest CT, lymphocyte count, hs-CRP, and SAA can be used in disease diagnosis. The D-dimer level plays an important role in critically ill patients and it is suggested that D-dimer can be used to monitor change in the condition of severely ill patients. There are certain limitations to this study, in that the number of patients was small and it should be classified as a retrospective study. We hope to have more samples in future to carry out a more comprehensive study and elucidate better means for the clinical treatment of COVID-19.