Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colombia’s organ trade: Evidence from Bogotá and Medellín

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

This quantitative study seeks to determine why the underground organ commerce exists and thrives in Colombia, and how it responds to global donor shortages, public opposition and government initiatives to curtail it. Policy lessons and insights from the Colombian experience in organ donation and transplantation are identified in this study.

Subjects and Methods

Statistical random samples of 169 living and paid Colombian donors (or vendors) were apportioned between the key organ supplier cities of Bogotá and Medellín based on population. A pre-tested and interviewer-administered questionnaire was designed for organ vendors in these multi-stage samples. Qualitative analysis of pertinent Colombian laws and regulations forms the other half of this study.

Results

Survey results from Bogotá and Medellín tend to indicate shared demographic characteristics between Colombian vendors and their counterparts in developing countries that are major destinations for organ trafficking. The organ trade in Colombia is generally open, brokered and without price competition and provisions for vendors’ postoperative care, which help attract many foreign buyers. These factors also increase the vulnerability of vendors to unscrupulous third parties. The study finds that public indifference, state/institutional incapacity, corruption, and constantly changing trade environments, rules and operations subvert the legal and regulatory framework for organ donation and transplantation, which in Colombia is rather unique for its extent of coverage, complexity and detail.

Conclusion

The empirical evidence obtained from Bogotá and Medellín offers a challenge for governments to look beyond the availability of legal and regulatory restraints and remedies. Why and how these can be effectively undermined by organ trade participants without necessarily affecting or reversing their economic behavior are pressing issues that demand immediate attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Transaction costs are costs incurred by buyers and sellers that are not directly related to the production and transport of the commodity in question. They include information searches, contracting, bargaining, marketing, advertising, policing and enforcement.

References

  • Becker GS, Elias JJ (2007) Introducing incentives in the market for live and cadaveric organ donations. J Eco Pers 21:2–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, J.G.L. (2008). Informe Colombia VII Reunión Red Consejo Iberoamericano de Donación y Trasplante. Mexico, November 16–18.

  • Cherry M (2005) Kidney for Sale by Owner: Human Organs, Transplantation, and the Market. Georgetown University Press, Georgetown

    Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, K. (2009). Body Parts à la Carte: What Living Organ Donors Can Spare. Newsweek. July 24.

  • Danziger, R (2006). Human Trafficking. International Organization for Migration, Japan. Available at http://www.iomjapan.org/archives/IOM_RD_CTpresentation_25Feb2006.pdf (accessed December 9, 2009).

  • Fabregas L. (2007). Transplant ‘tourism’ questioned at medical centers in Colombia. Pittsburgh Tribune Review. February 18.

  • Friedman A (2002) Payment for living organ donation should be legalized. BMJ 333:746–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin M (2006) Black Markets: The Supply and Demand of Body Parts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal M et al (2002) Economic and health consequences of selling a kidney in India. JAMA 288:1589–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer RA, El Nahas AM (2006) The burden of chronic kidney disease is rising rapidly worldwide. BMJ 332:563–564, March 11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (2002) An ethically defensible market in organs. BMJ 325:114–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hou S (2000) Expanding the kidney donor pool: Ethical and medical considerations. Kidney Int 58:1820–1836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Salud. Donación y Trasplante de Órganos y Tejidos. Available at http://www.ins.gov.co/?idcategoria=1258 (accessed November 2, 2009).

  • Interlandi, J. Health: Not Just Urban Legend. Newsweek, January 19, 2009.

  • Laughlin B (1981) Black Markets around the World. Loompanics Unlimited, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim Y, Kim W (2008) The global impact of hepatic fibrosis and end-stage liver disease. Clin Liv Dis 12:733–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moazam F, Zaman R, Jafarey AM (2009) Conversations with kidney vendors in Pakistan: an ethnographic study. Hastings Cent Rep 39(3):29–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moreman CM (2008) Beyond the Threshold: Afterlife Beliefs and Experiences in World Religions. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi SAA et al (2007) A socioeconomic survey of kidney vendors in Pakistan. Transp Int 20:934–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla BS (2009) Regulated compensation for kidney donors in the Philippines. Curr Op Org Transpl 14:120–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensa, P. (2008). Human Tissue. Mi Cirugía en Colombia, November. Available at http://www.micirugiaencolombia.com/articulo.phphome=1&seccion_id=8&articulo_id=93&idioma_id=2 (accessed May 7, 2009).

  • Reuters World Report (1996). Colombia Cracks Down on Trafficking in Human Organs. October 11.

  • Roth, A. E., Sonmez, T., Unver, M. (2005). Efficient Kidney Exchange: Coincidence of Wants in a Structured Market. Microeconomics.

  • Roth AE (2007) Repugnance as a constraint on markets. J Eco Pers 21:37–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satel S (ed) (2009) When Altruism Isn’t Enough: The Case for Compensating Kidney Donors. AEI Press, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes N (2002) Should Markets Be Allowed to Solve the Shortage in Body Parts? In: Swartz TR, Bonello F (eds) Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Economic Issues. McGraw-Hill/Dushkin, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp LA (2000) The commodification of the body and its parts. Ann Rev Ant 29:287–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee of the Istanbul Summit (2008) Organ trafficking and transplant tourism and commercialism: The Declaration of Istanbul. Lancet 372:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime. 2000.

  • United States House of Representatives. (2009). Organs for Sale: China's Growing Trade and Ultimate Violation of Prisoners’ Rights. Hearing before the Sub-Committee on International Operations and Human Rights, Serial No. 107-29, Washington D.C., June 27, 2001, Available at http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa73452.000/hfa73452_0f.htm (accessed July 8, 2009).

  • Uy, J. Filipino kidneys cheapest in world black market, says NGO. Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 31, 2008.

  • World Health Organization. (2004). In Focus: Organ Trafficking and Transplantation Pose New Challenges. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82 (September), 9.

  • World Health Organization, FACTBOX: Five organ trafficking hotspots, Geneva, August 2005.

Download references

Financial Disclosure

None

Conflict of Interest

The author confirm that there are no relevant associations that might pose a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Lee Mendoza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendoza, R.L. Colombia’s organ trade: Evidence from Bogotá and Medellín. J Public Health 18, 375–384 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-010-0320-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-010-0320-3

Keywords

Navigation