Abstract
Aims/Background
This study measures the performance of the health system in 165 countries and its relationship with public financing.
Methods
We use value efficiency analysis (VEA), a refinement of data envelopment analysis (DEA), to measure the efficiency of the health systems using data on healthy life expectancy and disability adjusted life years as health outcomes. Expenditure on health and education are used as inputs to the health system.
Results
The group of high income OECD countries shows the largest indexes of efficiency and also the lowest dispersion. In contrast, low income countries also have the most inefficient health systems, which implies that there are more opportunities for improvement. The average efficiency score is 0.96 for high income countries, 0.83 for upper-middle income countries, 0.86 for lower-middle income countries and only 0.76 for low income countries. Only 17 countries have a score equal to 1 and therefore are completely efficient and can be taken as referents. The index of efficiency is found to be positively associated with government expenditure on health as a percentage of total expenditure on health.
Conclusions
The analysis of the results shows that the public share in health expenditure and the weight of health expenditure in public budgets are two factors positively associated with the performance of the health systems. The study also highlights the advantages of using VEA over DEA in the measurement of performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afonso A, St. Aubyn M (2005) Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries. J Appl Econ 8:227–246
Ali AI (1994) Computational aspects of data envelopment analysis. In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (eds) DEA: theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 63–88
Allen R, Athanassopoulos R, Dyson G, Thanassoulis E (1997) Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development, and future directions. Ann Oper Res 73:13–34
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies. Manage Sci 39:1261–1264
Brockett PL, Golany B (1996) Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 42(3):466–472
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency on decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
Cowell AJ (2006) The relationship between education and health behavior: some empirical evidence. Health Econ 15:125–146
Cutler DM, Lleras-Muney A (2006) Education and health: evaluating theories and evidence. NBER Working Paper N. 12352
Dyson RG, Thanassoulis E (1988) reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 6:563–576
Enthoven AC (1980) Health plan: the only practical solution to the soaring cost of medical care. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusets
Evans DB, Tandon A, Murray CJL, Lauer JA (2001) Comparative efficiency of national health systems: cross national econometric analysis. Br Med J 323:307–310
Fusch VR (2004) Perspective: more variation in the use of care, more flat of the curve medicine. Health Aff 23:104–107
Grossman M, Kaestner R (2004) The effects of education on health. In: Behrman JR, Stacey N (eds) The social benefits of education. University of Michigan Press, Michigan, pp 69–113
Grossman M (2005) Education and nonmarket outcomes. NBER Working Paper N. 11582
Gupta S, Verhoeven M (2001) The efficiency of government expenditure. Experiences from Africa. J Policy Model 23:433–467
Häkkinen U, Joumard I (2007) Cross-country analysis of efficiency in oecd health care sectors: options for research. OECD Economics Department Working Papers N. 554. OECD Publishing, Paris
Halme M, Joro T, Korhonen P, Salo S, Wallenius J (1999) A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 45(1):103–115
Hertzman C (1999) The social dimensions of public health. In: World Social Science Report, UNESCO Publishing, London, pp 341–351
Hollingsworth B, Dawson PJ, Maniadakis N (1999) Efficiency measurement of health care: a review of nonparametric methods and applications. Health Care Manage Sci 2:161–172
Kooreman P (1994) Nursing home care in the Netherlands: a nonparametric efficiency analysis. J Health Econ 13(3):301–316
Korhonen P, Siljamäki A, Soismaa M (1998) Practical aspects of value efficiency analysis. Interim Report IR-98-42, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Lauer JA, Lovell CAK, Murray CJL, Evans DB (2004) World health system performance revisited: the impact of varying the relative importance of health system goals. BMC Health Serv Res 4:19
Naylor CD, Iron K, Handa K (2002) Measuring health performance: problems and opportunities in the era of assessment and accountability. In: Smith PC (ed) Measuring up: improving health system performance in OECD countries. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 13–34
Or Z (2000) Determinants of health care on mortality across OECD countries: a pooled, cross-country, time-series analysis. OECD Economic Studies Nº 30. OECD Publishing, Paris
Pedraja F, Salinas J, Smith P (1997) On the role of weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 8:215–230
Puig J (2000) Efficiency in primary care: a critical review of frontier indicators. Rev Esp Salud Pública 74:483–495
Räty T, Luoma K (2005) Nonparametric country rankings using indicators and OECD health data. Valtion Taloudellinen Tutkimuskeskus 74:1–19
Retzlaff-Roberts D, Chang CF, Rubin RM (2004) Technical efficiency in the use of health care resources: a comparison of OECD countries. Health Policy 69:55–72
Richardson J, Wildman J, Robertson IK (2003) A critique of the World Health Organization’s evaluation of health system performance. Health Econ 12:355–366
Roll Y, Cook WD, Golany B (1991) Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis. IIE Trans 23:2–9
Ross CE, Wu C (1995) The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev 60:719–745
Sarrico CS, Dyson RG (2004) Restricting virtual weights in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 159:17–34
Sueyoshi T, Aoki S (2001) A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test. Omega 29(1):1–18
Thompson RG, Singleton F, Thrall R, Smith B (1996) Comparative site evaluations for locating a high energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16:35–49
Thomson S, Mossialos E (2004) What are the equity, efficiency, cost containment and choice implications of private health-care funding in Western Europe?. Health Evidence Network Report. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E83334.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2009
Wong Y-HB, Beasley JE (1990) Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 41:829–835
World Health Organization (2001) The World Health Report 2000. Health systems: improving performance. Geneva
Worthington AC (2004) Frontier efficiency measurement in health care: a review of empirical techniques and selected applications. Med Care Res Rev 61(2):135–170
Acknowledgements
A preliminary version of this paper was published as working paper N 417 in the working papers series of Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorro (FUNCAS).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González, E., Cárcaba, A. & Ventura, J. Value efficiency analysis of health systems: does public financing play a role?. J Public Health 18, 337–350 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0311-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0311-4