Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Methodology of physical-activity and energy-expenditure assessment: a review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decades, substantial epidemiological evidence has been accumulated on the protective role of increased physical activity (PA) for the prevention and management of certain chronic diseases. To better address the impact of physical activity on health, valid and reliable instruments for its measurement are essential. Because of its dimensionality, a large number of methods exist for the assessment of various aspects of physical activity. This review provides a summary of available tools for measuring physical activity and total energy expenditure (TEE) and addresses their advantages and limitations in assessing PA in epidemiological surveys. The selection of the appropriate method for a specific survey should be based on criteria such as experimental goals, sample size, budget, cultural and social/environmental factors, physical burden for the subject, and statistical factors such as validity and reliability. The instruments that are very precise in measuring total energy expenditure such as doubly-labeled water method and direct and indirect calorimetry tend to be impractical on a population basis. On the other hand, methods such as self-report techniques are applicable for epidemiological studies, but they lack accuracy in measuring energy expenditure (EE).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The metabolic equivalent (MET) represents the ratio of energy expended in (KJ or Kcal) divided by resting energy expenditure (KJ or Kcal). For each activity, a MET value has been assigned that characterizes its intensity. One MET is considered to represent resting energy expenditure, or approximately 3.5 ml kg−1 min−1 in terms of oxygen consumption.

  2. RMR represents the amount of energy expended under restful conditions. RMR is approximately 10% higher than BMR

References

  • Ainslie PN, Reilly T, Westerterp KR (2003) Estimating energy expenditure. A review of techniques with particular reference to double labeled water. Sports Med 33:683–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth BE (1997) A collection of physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:S59–S61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth BE, Sternfeld B, Richardson MT, Jackson K (2000) Evaluation of the Kaiser physical activity survey in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1327–1338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DR (2000) Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:30–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DR Jr, BE, Leggett SR, Mathien CA, Main JA, Hunter DC, Duncan GE (1996) Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:1071–1077

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’ Brien WL, King GA (2000) Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S471–S480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman AE (2004) Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000–2003. J Sci Med Sport 1:6–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom B (1982) National Centre for Health Statistics, current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1981. Vital and Health Statistics: series 10, no.14. U.S. Department of Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 2–1569, Hyattsville, MD

  • Bouten CVC, Verboeket-van de Venne WPHG, Westerterp KR, Verduin M, Janssen JD (1996) Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. J Appl Physiol 81:1019–1026

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caspersen CJ, Pollard RA (1988) Validity of global self-reports of physical activity in epidemiology. CVD Epidemiology Newsletter 43:15

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM (1985) Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health related research. Public Health Rep 100:126–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR Jr (2003) Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1455–1460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freedson PS, Miller K (2000) Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell WL, Kiernan M (2000) Methodologic issues in measuring physical activity and physical fitness when evaluating the role of dietary supplements for physically active people. Am J Clin Nutr 72:S541–S550

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P (2000) Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S442–S449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman T, Leon AS (1993) A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:81–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janz KF (2002) Heart rate monitors to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed): Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 143–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim NL, Blanton CA, Kretch MJ (2004) America’s obesity epidemic: measuring physical activity to promote an active lifestyle. J Am Diet Assoc 104:1398–1409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamonte MJ, Ainsworth BE (2001) Quantifying energy expenditure and physical activity in the context of dose response. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S370–S378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ (1985) Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. Public Health Reports 100:1310–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee IM, Skerrett PJ (2001) Physical activity and all-cause mortality: what is the dose response relation? Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S459–S471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone MB, Robson PJ, Wallace JM, McKinley MC (2003) How active are we? Levels of routine physical activity in children and adults. Proc Nutr Soc 62:681–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macera CA, Jhones DA, Kimsey CD, Ham S, Pratt M (2000) New directions in surveillance of physical activity among U.S. adults: a pilot study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane DJ (2001) Automated metabolic gas analysis systems: a review. Sports Med 31:841–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews CE (2002) Techniques for physical activity assessment. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics Publisher, Champaigne, IL, pp 105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie TL (2002) Use of direct observation to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 179–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Melanson EL, Freedson PS (1996) Physical activity assessment: a review of methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 36:385–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montoye HJ, Taylor HL (1984) Measurement of physical activities on population studies: a review. Hum Biol 56:195–216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Sarris WHM, Washburn RA (1996) Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL:

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate RR (1993) Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 33:321–326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira MA, FitzerGerald SJ, Gregg EW, Joswiak ML, Ryan WJ, Suminski RR Utter AC, Zmuda JM (1997) A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:S1–S203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sallis JF, Saelens BE (2000) Assessment of physical activity by self-reports: status limitations and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:S1–S14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeller DA, Racette SB (1990) A review of field techniques for the assessment of energy expenditure. J Nutr 120:1492–1495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeller DA, Van Saten E (1982) Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by double-labelled water method. J Appl Physiol 53:955–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RJ (2003) Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires: review. Br J Sports Med 37:197–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speakman JR (1998) The history and theory of the doubly labeled water technique. Am J Clin Nutr 68:S932–S938

    Google Scholar 

  • Starling RD (2002) Use of doubly labeled water and indirect calorimetry to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research, Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Physical activity and health : a report of the Surgeon General. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

  • Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Martens M, Huygens W, Troosters T, Beunen G (2005) How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 12:102–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wareham NJ, Rennie KL (1998) The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2:S30–S38

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn RA, Adams LL, Haile GT (1987) Physical activity assessment for epidemiologic research: the utility of two simplified approaches. Prev Med 16:636–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webb P (1980) The measurement of energy exchange in man: an analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 33:1299–1310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welk GJ (2002) Use of the accelerometry-based activity monitors to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed): Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 125–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW (2000) A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports and Exerc 32:S489–S497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood TM (2000) Issues and future directions in assessing physical activity: An introduction to the conference proceedings. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:ii–vii

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest:

None Declared

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Medical School, University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias St., 115 27, Athens, Greece

    E. M. Valanou, C. Bamia & A. Trichopoulou

Authors
  1. E. M. Valanou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Bamia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Trichopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Trichopoulou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valanou, E.M., Bamia, C. & Trichopoulou, A. Methodology of physical-activity and energy-expenditure assessment: a review. J Public Health 14, 58–65 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-006-0021-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-006-0021-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation