Skip to main content
Log in

Work Place Health Promotion

A longitudinal study in companies placed in Hessen and Thueringen

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article deals with the question of whether and how much workplace health promotion measures have infiltrated the working world and which factors determined the results of health promotion programs for the enterprises. To answer this question we conducted a longitudinal study (measuring times: 1997 and 2003) in 150 enterprises in Hessen and Thueringen of the service sector and metal branch. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect the data. One of the results was that the high level of occupational safety and health (OSH) obtained was greatly appreciated by the enterprises interviewed. Many of the enterprises (82.7%) were able to implement at least one workplace health promotion (WHP) measure, mostly assessments of occupational health risks and behavior-oriented offers. The portion of businesses with a very good to sufficient level of workplace health promotion increased clearly from 16.0% in 1997 to 27.4% in 2003. Half of the enterprises interviewed confirmed the need for information and consultation in questions about occupational safety and health issues and workplace health promotion. They expected support particularly from the institutions for statutory occupational accident insurance, health insurance companies, public institutions for labor protection and safety engineering, as well as from the advisory boards of the trade unions. These institutions definitely need to address the consultation requests from the enterprises, as the lack of information and contact persons was one of the reasons why workplace health promotion measures could not be implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Spitzenverbände der Krankenkassen (2001) Dokumentation 2001. Leistungen der Primärprävention und der betrieblichen Gesundheitsförderung gemäß § 20 Abs. 1 und 2 SGB V. Eigenverlag, Bergisch Gladbach, Bochum, Bonn, Essen, Hamburg, Kassel, Siegburg

  • Arbeitskammer des Saarlandes (2003) Saarland: Im betrieblichen Gesundheitsschutz gibt es erhebliche Defizite. Arbeit & Ökologie, 11:6–8

  • Badura B (2000) Einleitung. In Bertelsmann Stiftung & Hans Böckler Stiftung. Erfolgreich durch Gesundheitsmanagement—Beispiele aus der Arbeitswelt. Eigenverlag, Gütersloh

  • Badura B, Hehlmann T (2003) Betriebliche Gesundheitspolitik. Der Weg zur gesunden Organisation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, Hans Böckler Stiftung (2002) Expertenkommission “Betriebliche Gesundheitspolitik”. Eigenverlag,Gütersloh Düsseldorf

  • Gröben F (2002) Ergebnisse einer Umfrage bei Führungskräften zur Prävention und betrieblichen Gesundheitsförderung im öffentlichen Dienst in Hessen und Thüringen. In: Badura B, et al (eds) Fehlzeiten-Report 2001. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 50–62

  • Gröben F, Bös K (1999) Praxis betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung. Maßnahmen und Erfahrungen—ein Querschnitt. edition sigma, Berlin

  • Lenhardt U (2001) Wirksamkeit betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung in bezug auf Rückenbeschwerden und durch Rückenbeschwerden bedingte Arbeitsunfähigkeit: Veröffentlichungsreihe der Arbeitsgruppe Public Health, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, pp 1–203

  • MASQT (Ministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, Qualifikation und Technologie des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen) (2001) Arbeitswelt NRW 2000. Belastungsfaktoren—Bewältigungsformen—Arbeitszufriedenheit. Eigenverlag, Düsseldorf

  • Network for Workplace Health Promotion (1997) The Luxembourg Declaration on Work Health Promotion in the European Union. www.enwhp.org/download/ luxembourg_declaration.pdf

  • Ulmer J, Gröben F (2004) Gesundheitsförderung im Betrieb: Postulat und Realität. 15 Jahre nach Ottawa—Umsetzung des Settingansatzes. Düsseldorf: Arbeitspapier 88 der Hans Böckler Stiftung

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdinand Groeben.

Additional information

This study was commissioned by the Hans Boeckler Foundation and the SMBG and translated by Evelyn Jäck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulmer, J., Groeben, F. Work Place Health Promotion. J Public Health 13, 144–152 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-005-0101-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-005-0101-6

Keywords

Navigation