Skip to main content
Log in

Esophagus stretch tests: Biomechanics for tissue engineering and possible implications on the outcome of esophageal atresia repairs performed under excessive tension

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Esophageal biomechanical studies are important to understand structural changes resulting from stretches during repair of esophageal atresias as well as to obtain values to compare with the biomechanics of tissue-engineered esophagus in the future. This study aimed to investigate light microscopic changes after uniaxial stretching of the ovine esophagus.

Methods

In vitro uniaxial stretching was performed on esophagi (n = 20) of 1-month-old lambs within 4–6 h post-mortem. Esophagi were divided into 5 groups: control and stretched (1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4). Force and lengthening were measured with 5 cycles performed on every specimen using a PBS organ bath at 37 °C. Histological studies were performed on the 5 groups.

Results

Low forces of ~ 2 N (N) were sufficient for a 1.2–1.25 stretch in the 1st cycle, whereas a three times higher force (~ 6 N) was needed for a stretch of 1.3. In the 2nd to 5th cycle, the tissue weakened and a force of ~ 3 N was sufficient for a stretch of 1.3. Histologically, in the 1.3–1.4 stretch groups, rupture of muscle fibers and capillaries were observed, respectively. Changes in mucosa and collagen fibers could not be observed.

Conclusions

These results offer norm values from the native esophagus to compare with the biomechanics of future tissue-engineered esophagus. Esophageal stretching > 1.3 leads to tears in muscle fibers and to rupture of capillaries. These findings can explain the decrease in microcirculation and scarring in mobilized tissue and possibly offer clues to impaired motility in esophagus atresias repaired under excessive tension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clark DC. Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Am Fam Phycisian. 1999;59:910–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haight C, Towsley H. Congenital atresia of the esophagus with tracheoesophageal fistula: extrapleural ligation of fistula and end-to-end anastomosis of esophageal segments. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1943;76:672–88.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Spitz L. Oesophageal atresia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biller JA, Allen JL, Schuster SR, Treves ST, Winter HS. Long-term evaluation of esophageal and pulmonary function in patients with repaired esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Dig Dis Sci. 1987;32:985–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dutta HK, Rajani M, Bhatnagar V. Cineradiographic evaluation of postoperative patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Pediatr Surg Int. 2000;16:322–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemoine C, Aspirot A, Le Henaff G, Piloquet H, Lévesque D, Faure C. Characterization of esophageal motility following esophageal atresia repair using high-resolution esophageal manometry. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56:609–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. Long-term outcome of esophageal anastomosis. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013;23:219–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spitz L, Ruangtrakool R. Esophageal substitution. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1998;7:130–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cusick EL, Batchelor AA, Spicer RD. Development of a technique for jejunal interposition in long-gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28:990–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Raffensperger JG, Kuck SR, Reynolds M, et al. Intestinal bypass of the esophagus. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:38–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Spitz L. Esophageal atresia- lessons I have learned in a 40-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:1635–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arul GS, Parikh D. Oesophageal replacement in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:7–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Atug O, Dobrucali A, Orlando RC. Critical pH level of lye (NaOH) for esophageal injury. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:980–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bronstein AC, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR Jr, et al. 2008 Annual report of the American association of poison control centers’ national poison data system (NPDS): 26th annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009;47:911–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saxena AK, Ainoedhofer H, Höllwarth ME. Culture of ovine epithelial cells and in vitro esophagus tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16:109–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kofler K, Ainoedhofer H, Tausendschön J, Höllwarth ME, Saxena AK. Esophageal smooth muscle cells dedifferentiate with loss of a-smooth muscle actin expression after 8 weeks of explant expansion in vitro culture: Implications on esophagus tissue engineering. Eur Surg. 2011;43:168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kofler K, Ainoedhofer H, Höllwarth ME, Saxena AK. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting of PCK-26 antigen-positive cells enables selection of ovine esophageal epithelial cells with improved viability on scaffolds for esophagus tissue engineering. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26:97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malvasio V, Ainoedhofer H, Ackbar R, Höllwarth ME, Saxena AK. Effects of sodium hydroxide exposure on esophageal epithelial cells in an in vitro ovine model: implications for esophagus tissue engineering. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:874–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saxena AK, Baumgart H, Komann C, Ainoedhofer H, Soltysiak P, Kofler K, Höllwarth ME. Esophagus tissue engineering: in situ generation of rudimentary tubular vascularized esophageal conduit using the ovine model. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:859–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holzapfel GA, Sommer G, Regitnig P. Anisotropic mechanical properties of tissue components in human atherosclerotic plaques. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:657–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sommer G, Gasser TC, Regitnig P, Auer M, Holzapfel GA. Dissection properties of the human aortic media: an experimental study. J Biomech Eng. 2008;130:021007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mullins L. Effect of stretching on the properties of rubber. J Rubber Res. 1947;16:275–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Saxena AK. Congenital anomalies of soft tissues: birth defects depending on tissue engineering solutions and present advances in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16:455–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saxena AK. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research perspectives for pediatric surgery. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26:557–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aspirot A, Faure C. Esophageal dysmotility: characterization and pathophysiology. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26:405–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shono T, Suita S, Arima T, et al. Motility function of the esophagus before primary anastomosis in esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28:673–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Soltysiak P, Höllwarth ME, Saxena AK. Comparisson of suture techniques in the formation of collagen scaffold tubes for composite tubular organ tissue engineering. Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20:1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Macheiner T, Ackbar R, Saxena AK. Isolation, identification and culture of myenteric plexus cells from ovine esophagus. Esophagus. 2013;10:144–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ackbar R, Malvasio V, Holzer P, Saxena AK. In vitro effect of bethanechol and suberyldicholine on regions of guinea pig esophagus. J Surg Res. 2012;174:56–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sommer G, Schriefl A, Zeindlinger G, Katzensteiner A, Ainödhofer H, Saxena AK, Holzapfel GA. Multiaxial mechanical response and constitutive modeling of esophageal tissues: impact on esophageal tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:9379–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by an European Union Grant within the 6th Framework Program (EuroSTEC; LSHC-CT-2006-037409). The authors would like to thank Mrs. Anna Kuess from the Unit of Experimental Fetal Surgery and Tissue Engineering, Medical University of Graz, Austria for her valuable support, and Mr. Georg Zeindlinger from the Institute of Biomechanics, Graz University of Technology, Austria for his support on the experimental tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amulya K. Saxena.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

All experiments were performed according to the local and national research guidelines approved for the EuroSTEC project.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

For this type of study, no formal consent is required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saxena, A.K., Biro, E., Sommer, G. et al. Esophagus stretch tests: Biomechanics for tissue engineering and possible implications on the outcome of esophageal atresia repairs performed under excessive tension. Esophagus 18, 346–352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00769-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00769-y

Keywords

Navigation