Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Size analysis of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: diameter distribution and assessment of accuracy of preoperative diagnosis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In esophageal cancer, lymphatic spread occurs more frequently and at an earlier stage than in other gastrointestinal cancers, and both preoperative and intraoperative diagnoses of lymph nodes metastases are sometimes incorrect. Our objective was to measure the sizes of lymphatic metastases and to examine the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of lymphatic spread in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Methods

The sizes of 320 metastatic lymph nodes of 9254 dissected nodes from 92 consecutive esophagectomy patients over 1 year were measured and compared with the sizes of the actual metastases within the nodes. These data allowed investigation of the correct rate of preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis.

Results

The mean diameter of the metastases was 4.8 mm, which was significantly smaller than that of the involved lymph nodes. Among the metastatic lymph nodes, 37.2% were less than 5 mm in diameter, and 63.1% of the metastases were less than 5 mm in diameter. The true-positive and true-negative diagnosis rate for all lymph node stations in three fields (neck, thorax, and abdomen) was only 23.2%, and the false-negative rate for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis was 53.7%.

Conclusions

Two-thirds of involved lymph nodes had very small metastases (<5 mm), suggesting that limited confidence should be placed in the preoperative diagnosis of lymphatic spread. Therefore, extensive lymph node dissection appears appropriate in esophageal cancer surgery, given the small sizes of many metastases and the difficulty with preoperative diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H Kuwano M Nakajima T Miyazaki H Kato (2003) ArticleTitleDistinctive clinicopathological characteristics in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 9 6–13 Occurrence Handle12667124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. SB Hosch NH Stoecklein U Pichlmeier A Rehders P Scheunemann A Niendorf et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEsophageal cancer: the mode of lymphatic tumor cell spread and its prognostic significance J Clin Oncol 19 1970–5 Occurrence Handle11283129 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3js1yltw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H Akiyama M Tsurumaru H Udagawa Y Kajiyama (1994) ArticleTitleRadical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus Ann Surg 220 364–73 Occurrence Handle8092902 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199409000-00012 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA2sbos10%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. InstitutionalAuthorNameJapanese Society for Esophageal Diseases (2004) ArticleTitleGuidelines for clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus. 9th ed Esophagus 1 61–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. ID Fleming JS Cooper DE Henson RVP Hutter BJ Kennedy GP Murphy et al. (1997) AJCC cancer staging manual EditionNumber5th ed Lippincott Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. InstitutionalAuthorNameJapanese Gastric Cancer Association (1999) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma EditionNumber13th ed Kanehara Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  7. A Sharma P Fidias LA Hayman SL Loomis KH Taber SL Aquino (2004) ArticleTitlePatterns of lymphadenopathy in thoracic malignancies Radiographics 24 419–34 Occurrence Handle15026591

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. VJ Lowe F Booya JG Fletcher M Nathan E Jensen B Mullan et al. (2005) ArticleTitleComparison of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer Mol Imaging Biol 7 422–30 Occurrence Handle16270235 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s11307-005-0017-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. YC Yoon KS Lee YM Shim BT Kim K Kim TS Kim (2003) ArticleTitleMetastasis to regional lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: CT versus FDG PET for presurgical detection prospective study Radiology 227 764–70 Occurrence Handle12773680

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. T Nishimaki O Tanaka N Ando H Ide H Watanabe M Shinoda et al. (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the accuracy of preoperative staging in thoracic esophageal cancer Ann Thorac Surg 68 2059–64 Occurrence Handle10616977 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01171-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FotlaltQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. JF Griffith AC Chan AT Ahuja SF Leung LT Chow SC Chung et al. (2000) ArticleTitleNeck ultrasound in staging squamous oesophageal carcinoma – a high yield technique Clin Radiol 55 696–701 Occurrence Handle10988048 Occurrence Handle10.1053/crad.2000.0502 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvpsVKhsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S Natsugoe H Yoshinaka M Shimada K Shirao S Nakano C Kusano et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAssessment of cervical lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma using ultrasonography Ann Surg 229 62–6 Occurrence Handle9923801 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199901000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7itVKktA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. CP Hansen K Oskarsson D Mortensen (2000) ArticleTitleComputed tomography for staging of oesophageal cancer Ann Chir Gynaecol 89 14–8 Occurrence Handle10791639 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ltVakug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. JV Rasanen EI Sihvo MJ Knuuti HR Minn ME Luostarinen P Laippala et al. (2003) ArticleTitleProspective analysis of accuracy of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography in staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction Ann Surg Oncol 10 954–60 Occurrence Handle14527917 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2003.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. T Funai H Osugi M Higashino H Kinoshita (2000) ArticleTitleEstimation of lymph node metastasis by size in patients with intrathoracic oesophageal cancer Br J Surg 87 1234–9 Occurrence Handle10971434 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01527.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fjs1OrsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DK Dhar M Tachibana N Kinukawa M Riruke H Kohno AG Little et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe prognostic significance of lymph node size in patients with squamous esophageal cancer Ann Surg Oncol 9 1010–6 Occurrence Handle12464595 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2002.03.090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. T Komori Y Doki T Kabuto O Ishikawa M Hiratsuka Y Sasaki et al. (2003) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of the size of cancer nests in metastatic lymph nodes in human esophageal cancers J Surg Oncol 82 19–27 Occurrence Handle12501165 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jso.10184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. MA Eloubeidi R Desmond MR Arguedas CE Reed CM Wilcox (2002) ArticleTitlePrognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status Cancer (Phila) 95 1434–43 Occurrence Handle10.1002/cncr.10868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. SM Wren P Stijns S Srinivas (2002) ArticleTitlePositron emission tomography in the initial staging of esophageal cancer Arch Surg 137 1001–6 Occurrence Handle12215149 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.137.9.1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiaki Kajiyama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kajiyama, Y., Iwanuma, Y., Tomita, N. et al. Size analysis of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: diameter distribution and assessment of accuracy of preoperative diagnosis. Esophagus 3, 189–195 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-006-0092-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-006-0092-6

Key words

Navigation