Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the various perimetric parameters that best predict reduction of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) to worse than 0.5 in the near future in eyes with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
Methods
The most recent records obtained by Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) central 10-2 perimetry were studied for the right eyes of 123 patients (60 men and 63 women) with typical RP. The correlation between various parameters of perimetric sensitivity and BCVA was retrospectively studied. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to find the best parameter to discriminate eyes with BCVA ≥0.5 from those with BCVA <0.5.
Results
Spearman rank correlation coefficients with logMAR BCVA were the highest for the foveal threshold (FT) and mean sensitivity of the test points within 1.4° of the fixation point (MS1.4). The ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve was the largest for the MS1.4 among all the perimetric parameters for discriminating eyes with BCVA ≥0.5 from those with BCVA <0.5. The cutoff value of 30 dB showed 100 % specificity and 57 % sensitivity.
Conclusions
The risk of vision decreasing below 0.5 in the near future may be predicted when the mean sensitivity within 1.4° of the fixation point in the HFA 10-2 reaches 30 dB in eyes with RP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hirakawa H, Iijima H, Gohdo T, Imai M, Tsukahara S. Progression of defects in the central 10° visual field of patients with retinitis pigmentosa and choroideremia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:436–42.
Iijima H. Correlation between visual sensitivity loss and years affected for eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56:224–9.
Szlyk JP, Fishman GA, Alexander KR, Revelins BI, Derlacki DJ, Anderson RJ. Relationship between difficulty in performing daily activities and clinical measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:53–9.
Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Fishman GA, Alexander KR, Grover S, Mahler CL. Perceived and actual performance of daily tasks: relationship to visual function tests in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:65–75.
Berson EL, Rosner B, Sandberg MA, Weigel-DiFranco C, Moser A, Brockhurst RJ, et al. Clinical trial of docosahexaenoic acid in patients with retinitis pigmentosa receiving vitamin A treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1297–305.
Berson EL, Rosner B, Sandberg MA, Weigel-DiFranco C, Brockhurst RJ, Hayes KC, et al. Clinical trial of lutein in patients with retinitis pigmentosa receiving vitamin A. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:403–11.
Nakazawa M, Ohguro H, Takeuchi K, Miyagawa Y, Ito T, Metoki T. Effect of nilvadipine on central visual field in retinitis pigmentosa: a 30-month clinical trial. Ophthalmologica. 2011;225:120–6.
Much JW, Liu C, Piltz-Seymour JR. Long-term survival of central visual field in end-stage glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1162–6.
Abe K, Iijima H, Hirakawa H, Tsukahara Y, Toda Y. Visual acuity and 10° automated static perimetry in eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2002;46:581–5.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by a JSPS KAKENHI Grant (no. 22591937) (Grant-in-aid for scientific Research [C]) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The author has no financial conflicts of interest to declare. The author thanks the members of the Retina Clinic of the University of Yamanashi Hospital, including Kyoko Kohno, Daisuke Yuzurihara, Toshihito Ariizumi, Tadasuke Hatori, Nami Chiba, Yoichi Sakurada, and Naohiko Tanabe, for their contributions in examining the participating patients. The author also thanks Naoko Matsui, Miho Sakurabayashi, Keiko Hanada, Takako Tanaka, and Yuki Suzuki for their assistance in conducting HFA perimetry.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Iijima, H. Visual loss and perimetric sensitivity in eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Jpn J Ophthalmol 57, 563–567 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-013-0271-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-013-0271-7