Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term intraocular pressure changes after combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 March 2013

Abstract

Purpose

To observe long-term changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) after a combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy procedure.

Methods

This was a retrospective case series at a single hospital. Of 105 consecutive cases that received combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for macular hole or epiretinal membrane, 85 eyes (patients) were followed up for 1 year or longer. The IOP of both eyes in the subjects who had surgery in one eye was measured at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months postoperatively. The IOP of the treated eye was compared with the fellow eye and with the baseline value at each follow-up visit.

Results

Intraocular pressure in the operated eyes at 3 months after surgery was significantly lower than that at baseline and than that in the respectively fellow eyes (P < 0.001, paired-t test with Bonferroni correction). The IOP subsequently returned to the baseline value or was the same as that of the fellow eye within 3 months of the observation time point. Only two treated eyes had elevated IOP exceeding 21 mmHg after 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

The change in the IOP after phacovitrectomy may be limited, and care when using this procedure because some eyes show increased IOP compared to the fellow eye after a long period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Demetriades AM, Gottsch JD, Thomsen R, Azab A, Stark WJ, Campochiaro PA, et al. Combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for eyes with coexisting cataract and vitreoretinal pathology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:291–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe A, Shibata T, Ozaki M, Okano K, Kozaki K, Tsuneoka H. Change in anterior chamber depth following combined pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation using different types of intraocular lenses. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54:383–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinberg RS, Peyman GA, Huamonte FU. Elevation of intraocular pressure after pars plana vitrectomy. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1976;200:157–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasegawa Y, Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Intraocular pressure elevation in the early postoperative period after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56:46–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aaberg TM, Van Horn DL. Late complication of pars plana vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 1978;85:126–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen QH, Lloyd MA, Heuer DK, Baerveldt G, Minckler DS, Lean JS, et al. Incidence and management of glaucoma after intravitreal silicone oil injection for complicated retinal detachments. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1520–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CJ. Glaucoma after macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology. 1988;105:94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tranos P, Asaria R, Aylward W, Sullivan P, Franks W. Long term outcome of secondary glaucoma following vitreoretinal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:341–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Desai UR, Alhalel AA, Schiffman RM, Campen TJ, Sundar G, Muhich A. Intraocular pressure elevation after simple pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:781–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang S. LXII Edward Jackson lecture: open angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:1033–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shingleton BJ, Gamell LS, O’Donoghue MW, Baylus SL, King R. Long-term changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification: normal patients versus glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:885–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudovernik M, Pahor D. Intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation in open-angle glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2003;220:835–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lai JS, Tham CC, Chan JC, Lam DS. Phacotrabeculectomy in treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2004;48:408–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jahn CE. Reduced intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:1260–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Radius RL, Schultz K, Sobocinski K, Schultz RO, Easom H. Pseudophakia and intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97:738–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamakiri K, Sakamoto T, Noda Y, Nakahara M, Ogino N, Kubota T, et al. Reduced incidence of intraoperative complications in a multicenter controlled clinical trial of triamcinolone in vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:289–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer MA, Savitt ML, Kopitas E. The effect of phacoemulsification on aqueous outflow facility. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1221–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steuhl KP, Marahrens P, Frohn C, Frohn A. Intraocular pressure and anterior chamber depth before and after extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23:233–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Althaus C, Demmer E, Sundmacher R. Anterior capsular shrinkage and intraocular pressure reduction after capsulorhexis. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1994;3:154–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lalezary M, Kim SJ, Jiramongkolchai K, Recchia FM, Agarwal A, Sternberg P Jr. Long-term trends in intraocular pressure after pars plana vitrectomy. Retina. 2011;21:679–85.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu AL, Brummeisl W, Schaumberger M, Kampik A, Welge-Lussen U. Vitrectomy does not increase the risk of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension—a 5-year follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248:1407–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kahn MG, Giblin FJ, Epstein DL. Glutathione in calf trabecular meshwork and its relation to aqueous humor outflow facility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:1283–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Siegfried CJ, Shui YB, Holekamp NM, Bai F, Beebe DC. Oxygen distribution in the human eye: relevance to the etiology of open-angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:5731–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barbazetto IA, Liang J, Chang S, Zheng L, Spector A, Dillon JP. Oxygen tension in the rabbit lens and vitreous before and after vitrectomy. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:917–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Holekamp NM, Shu YBi, Beebe DC. Vitrectomy surgery increases oxygen exposure to the lens: possible mechanism for nuclear cataract formation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:302–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McNulty R, Wang H, Mathias RT, Ortwerth BJ, Truscott RJ, Bassnett S. Regulation of tissue oxygen levels in the mammalian lens. J Physiol. 2004;559:883–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nguyen KP, Chung ML, Anderson PJ, Johnson M, Epstein DL. Hydrogen peroxide removal by the calf aqueous outflow pathway. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:976–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Podos S, Minas T, Moori F. A new instrument to measure episcleral venous pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;80:209–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamashita T, Uemura A, Kita H, Sakamoto T. Analysis of the retinal nerve fiber layer after indocyanine green-assisted vitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:280–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Welch JC. Dehydration injury as a possible cause of visual field defect after pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:698–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Imai H, Ohta K. Microperimetric determination of retinal sensitivity in areas of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer following internal limiting membrane peeling. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54:435–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Arima T, Uemura A, Otsuka S, Doi N, Nakao K. Macular hole surgery-associated peripheral visual field loss. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1998;42:476–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Almubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93:77–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a Grant from the Research Committee on Chorio-retinal Degeneration and Optic Atrophy, Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of the Japanese Government.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taiji Sakamoto.

About this article

Cite this article

Ki-I, Y., Yamashita, T., Uemura, A. et al. Long-term intraocular pressure changes after combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 57, 57–62 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-012-0207-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-012-0207-7

Keywords

Navigation