Skip to main content
Log in

Endothelial damage of a donor cornea depending on the donor insertion method during Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in porcine eyes

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare endothelial damage of the donor cornea in relation to the method of inserting the donor cornea into the recipient anterior chamber during Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

Methods

Fifteen enucleated pig eyes were used. The donor corneoscleral buttons were mounted in an artificial anterior chamber. The anterior lamella was excised using a microkeratome and punched using a trephine. The following methods were employed to insert the donor cornea into the recipient anterior chamber: (1) The donor was folded over, grasped using forceps, and inserted (“taco” technique). (2) The forceps were inserted and the edge of the donor was grasped and dragged into the chamber. (3) A loop was made at the edge of the donor by suturing with nylon. A hook was inserted to drag the donor by the loop into the chamber. After insertion, the incision on the recipient eye was extended, and the donor cornea was removed for examination. After vital staining, the samples were examined under a light microscope and a scanning electron microscope.

Results

With the taco technique, endothelial damage (17.9%) was observed in areas where the forceps held the donor. In the drag technique using forceps, endothelial damage (17.3%) was observed where the forceps made contact and in the folds in this area. In the drag technique using a suture, endothelial damage (18.8%) was observed in the area of the needle puncture and in folds in this area.

Conclusion

The amount of endothelial damage did not differ significantly among the three different methods of donor insertion during DSAEK in this animal model, but each method exhibited a different endothelial damage pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Price FW, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and technique to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Melles GRJ, Eggiak FAGJ, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998;17:618–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Replacing the endothelium without corneal surface incisions or sutures: the first United States clinical series using the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Ophthalmology 2003;110:755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1541–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25:886–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Busin M, Scorcia V. The DSAEK development and its modification for improved endothelial survival. In: Joo CK, editor. New horizons for non-surgical corneal reshaping and lamellar keratoplasty. Seoul: The Catholic University of Korea; 2007. p. 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor MJ, Hunt CJ. Dual staining of corneal endothelium with trypan blue and alizarin red S: Importance of pH for the dye-lake reaction. Br J Ophthalmol 1981;65:815–819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ, Meisler DM. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea 2007;26:670–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson RS. Introduction to DSAEK surgery. In: Joo CK, editor. New horizons for non-surgical corneal reshaping and lamellar keratoplasty. Seoul: The Catholic University of Korea; 2007. p. 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu Z, Rife L, Yiu S, et al. Technique for preparation of the corneal endothelium-Descemet membrane complex for transplantation. Cornea 2006;25:705–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ignacio TS, Nguyen TT, Sarayba MA, et al. A technique to harvest Descemet’s membrane with viable endothelial cells for selective transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ide T, Yoo SH, Goldman JM, Perez V, O’Brien TP. Descemetstripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: effect of inserting forceps on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using an in vitro delivery model and vital dye assay. Cornea 2007;26:1079–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saad HA, Terry MA, Shamie N, et al. An easy and inexpensive method for quantitative analysis of endothelial damage by using vital dye staining and Adobe Photoshop software. Cornea 2008;27:818–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta JS, Por YM, Poh R, Beuerman RW, Tan D. Comparison of donor insertion techniques for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1383–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mansoo Kim.

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, H., Kim, M. Endothelial damage of a donor cornea depending on the donor insertion method during Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in porcine eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 53, 523–530 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-009-0713-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-009-0713-4

Keywords

Navigation