Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of somatostatin and its analogs in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery

  • Review
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

BACKGROUND: The prophylactic use of somatostatin and its analogs has been suggested to lower the rate of pancreatic fistula. The aim of this review is to discuss the results of published randomized trials and meta-analyses studying the effect of somatostatin and its analogs. METHODS: We performed a Medline search for prospective randomized trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses with regard to the prophylactic use of somatostatin and its analogs. RESULTS: Eleven randomized trials and six meta-analyses were identified. The randomized trials differ in terms of study designs, diagnosis, operative procedures, drug dosage, time of administration, and the pancreatic fistula definition; therefore, it is advisable to carefully interpret the results of the individual randomized trials. CONCLUSIONS: The routine administration of somatostatin and its analogs in elective pancreatic surgery cannot be recommended. However, selective administration is advisable in cases which carry significantly higher risk of developing pancreatic fistula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Kausch W. Das Karcinom der Papilla duodeni und seine radikale Entfernung. Beitr Klin Chir 1912;78:439–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 1935;102:763–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, Cameron JL. Improved hospital morbidity, mortality, and survival after the Whipple procedure. Ann Surg 1987;206:358–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi C, Falconi M, Salvia R, et al. Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients. Dig Surg 2001;18:453–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bottger TC, Junginger T. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections. World J Surg 1999;23:164–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 2000; 232:786–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003;138:1310–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2006;244:931–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vin Y, Sima CS, Getrajdman GI, et al. Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:490–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1199–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balcom JH, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001;136:391–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006;244:10–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 1990;211:447–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997;226:248–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, et al. The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008;393: 459–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook RF, Hargrave K, Traverso LW. A prospective cost analysis of pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 1996;171: 508–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2005;92:539–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2007;246:425–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2007;193:171–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1280–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langrehr JM, Bahra M, Jacob D, et al. Prospective randomized comparison between a new mattress technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic resection. World J Surg 2005;29:1111–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peng SY, Mou YP, Liu YB, et al. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy: 150 consecutive cases without leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:898–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton CD, Garcea G, White SA, et al. Isolated Roux-loop pancreaticojejunostomy: a series of 61 patients with zero postoperative pancreaticoenteric leaks. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:701–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Usui S, Kajiwara H, et al. Current pancreatogastrointestinal anastomotic methods: results of a Japanese survey of 3109 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004;11:25–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klempa I, Schwedes U, Usadel KH. Prevention of postoperative pancreatic complications following duodenopancreatectomy using somatostatin. Chirurg 1979;50:427–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raptis S, Schlegel W, Lehmann E, et al. Effects of somatostatin on the exocrine pancreas and the release of duodenal hormones. Metabolism 1978;27:1321–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard M, Shapiro B, Pimstone B, et al. Metabolic clearance and plasma half-disappearance time of exogenous somatostatin in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979;48:50–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heintges T, Luthen R, Niederau C. Inhibition of exocrine pancreatic secretion by somatostatin and its analogues. Digestion 1994;55(Suppl. 1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klempa I, Baca I, Menzel J, et al. Effect of somatostatin on basal and stimulated exocrine pancreatic secretion after partial duodenopancreatectomy. A clinical experimental study. Chirurg 1991;62:293–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gyr KE, Meier R. Pharmacodynamic effects of Sandostatin in the gastrointestinal tract. Digestion 1993;54(Suppl. 1):14–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberts SW, van der Lely AJ, de Herder WW, et al. Octreotide. N Engl J Med 1996;334:246–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams ST, Woltering EA, O'Dorisio TM, et al. Effect of octreotide acetate on pancreatic exocrine function. Am J Surg 1989; 157:459–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconi M, Contro C, Ballabio M, et al. Evaluation of lanreotide effects on human exocrine pancreatic secretion after a single dose: preliminary study. Dig Liver Dis 2002;34:127–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamrani A, Vidon N, Sogni P, et al. Effects of lanreotide, a somatostatin analogue, on postprandial gastric functions and biliopancreatic secretions in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 43:65–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz MA, Drewe J, Ziel A, et al. The effects of vapreotide, a somatostatin analogue, on gastric acidity, gallbladder emptying and hormone release after 1 week of continuous subcutaneous infusion in normal subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999;47: 195–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, et al. Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg 1992;163:125–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Falconi M, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of complications of elective pancreatic surgery. Italian Study Group. Br J Surg 1994;81:265–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friess H, Beger HG, Sulkowski U, et al. Randomized controlled multicentre study of the prevention of complications by octreotide in patients undergoing surgery for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1995;82:1270–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montorsi M, Zago M, Mosca F, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Surgery 1995;117:26–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowy AM, Lee JE, Pisters PW, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 1997;226:632–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000;232:419–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouillat C, Chipponi J, Baulieux J, et al. Randomized controlled multicentre trial of somatostatin infusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1456–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shan YS, Sy ED, Lin PW. Role of somatostatin in the prevention of pancreatic stump-related morbidity following elective pancreaticoduodenectomy in high-risk patients and elimination of surgeon-related factors: prospective, randomized, controlled trial. World J Surg 2003;27:709–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarr MG. The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:556–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suc B, Msika S, Piccinini M, et al. Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2004;139:288–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse UJ, De Decker C, Houtmeyers P, et al. Prospectively randomized trial using perioperative low dose octreotide to prevent organ related and general complications following pancreatic surgery and pancreatico-jejunostomy. Acta Chir Belg 2005;105:383–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349: 2117–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, McPhee JT, et al. Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2009;249:635–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan H, Cameron JL, Choti MA, et al. The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:528–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998;228:429–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li-Ling J, Irving M. Somatostatin and octreotide in the prevention of postoperative pancreatic complications and the treatment of enterocutaneous pancreatic fistulas: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2001;88:190–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friess H, Bordihn K, Ebert M, et al. Inhibition of pancreatic secretion under long-term octreotide treatment in humans. Digestion 1994;55(Suppl. 1):10–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Londong W, Angerer M, Kutz K, et al. Diminishing efficacy of octreotide (SMS 201–995) on gastric functions of healthy subjects during one-week administration. Gastroenterology 1989; 96:713–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouillat C, Gigot JF. Pancreatic surgical complications – the case for prophylaxis. Gut 2001;49(Suppl. 4):32–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Closset J, Journe S, Mboti F, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing somatostatin with octreotide in the prevention of complications after pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2008;55:1818–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg L, MacNeil P, Turcotte L. Economic evaluation of the use of octreotide for prevention of complications following pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 1999;3:225–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poon RT, Lo SH, Fong D, et al. Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2002; 183:42–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connor S, Alexakis N, Garden OJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2005;92: 1059–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alghamdi AA, Jawas AM, Hart RS. Use of octreotide for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Surg 2007;50: 459–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Q, Zhang Q, Han S, et al. Efficacy of somatostatin and its analogues in prevention of postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pancreas 2008;36:18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koti RS, Gurusamy KS, Fusai G, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery: a Cochrane review. HPB (Oxford) 2010;12:155–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai E, Lau S, Lau WY. Measures to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. A comprehensive review. Arch Surg 2009;144:1074–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg 2004;21:54–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho CK, Kleeff J, Friess H, et al. Complications of pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2005;7:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojadinovic A, Brooks A, Hoos A, et al. An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:954–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Čečka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Čečka, F., Jon, B., Šubrt, Z. et al. The effect of somatostatin and its analogs in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery. Eur Surg 44, 99–108 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-011-0612-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-011-0612-z

Keywords

Navigation