Zusammenfassung
GRUNDLAGEN: Bei der Therapie der paraösophagealen Hernien (PEH) hat die laparoskopische Technik die offenen Operationen verdrängt. Gewisse Aspekte der operativen Therapie haben sich, unabhängig von der Methodik, bewährt. Andere wiederum werden weiterhin kontrovers diskutiert. METHODIK: Literaturanalyse. ERGEBNISSE: Die chirurgische Therapie der paraösophagealen Hernien (PEH) stellt den goldenen Standard bei symptomatischen Patienten dar. Bei asymptomatischen Patienten jedoch bleibt die Rolle der Chirurgie weiterhin unklar. In der Literatur liegen keine auf Evidenz basierenden Daten vor, die die Notwendigkeit einer routinemäßigen Durchführung einer Antirefluxmaßnahme bestätigen. Die Verwendung von Kunststoffnetzen bei großen Gewebedefekten wird in der Literatur sowohl empfohlen als auch als unnotwendig dargestellt. Die vorliegenden Daten bringen keine Klarheit darüber, ob die möglichen Vorteile oder das Risiko der Kunststoffnetz-bedingten Komplikationen überwiegen. Die Inzidenz und die klinische Signifikanz der Rezidive der PEH nach laparoskopischen Operationen sind unklar. Die publizierte Rezidivrate rangiert zwischen 0 und 42%. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Die laparoskopische Therapie der paraösophagealen Hernien stellt unbestritten eine anspruchsvolle Technik dar, welche jedoch bei exakter Durchführung exzellente Resultate ergeben kann.
Summary
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias (PEH) is replacing the open approach. Regardless of the technique, certain aspects of the repair have proven to be beneficial while others remain controversial. METHODS: Review of the literature. RESULTS: Surgical correction of paraesophageal hernias (PEH) is the gold standard for symptomatic patients, the role of surgery in asymptomatic patients is less clear. There is not good evidence-based data to support the routine addition of an antireflux procedure. Prosthetic repair of large defects has been both advocated and condemned in the literature. Conflicting data make it unclear whether the potential benefits outweigh the risk of mesh-related complications. The incidence and clinical significance of PEH recurrence after laparoscopic repair remain undefined. The recurrence rate in the literature after laparoscopic PEH repair ranges from 0 to 42%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair is a challenging procedure, but with meticulous technique, provides excellent results.
References
Hashemi M, Sillin LF, Peters JH (1999) Current concepts in the management of paraesophageal hiatal hernia. J Clin Gastroenterol 29: 8–13
Hill LD (1973) Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency. Am J Surg 126: 286–291
Skinner DB, Belsey RH (1967) Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53: 33–54
Landreneau RJ, Johnson JA, Marshall JB (1992) Clinical spectrum of paraesophageal herniation. Dig Dis Sci 37: 537–544
Maziak DE, Todd TRJ, Pearson FG (1998) Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115: 53–62
Pearson FG, Cooper JD, Ilves R (1983) Massive hiatal hernia with incarceration: a report of 53 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 35: 45–51
Pierre AF, Luketich JD, Fernando HC (2002) Results of laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias: 200 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg 74: 1909–1915
Targarona EM, Novell J, Vela S (2004) Mid term analysis of safety and quality of life after the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 18: 1045–1050
Luketich JD, Raja S, Fernando HC (2000) Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 232: 608–618
Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA (2001) Paraesophageal hernias: open, laparoscopic, or thoracic repair? Chest Surg Clin N Am 11: 589–603
Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR (2000) Laparoscopic repair of large Type III hiatal hernia: objective follow-up reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 190: 553–560
Maziak DE, Todd TR, Pearson FG (1998) Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 115: 53–60
Myers GA, Harms BA, Starling JR (1995) Management of paraesophageal hernia with a selective approach to antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 170: 375–380
Geha AS, Massad MG, Snow NJ (2000) A 32-year experience in 100 patients with giant paraesophageal hernia: the case for abdominal approach and selective antireflux repair. Surgery 128: 623–630
Leeder PC, Smith G, Dehn TC (2003) Laparoscopic management of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 17: 1372–1375
Wiechmann RJ, Ferguson MK, Naunheim KS (2001) Laparoscopic management of giant paraesophageal herniation. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 1080–1086
Diaz S, Brunt LM, Klingensmith ME (2003) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7: 59–66
Edye M, Canin-Endres J, Gattorno F, Salky BA (1998) Durability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia 228: 528–535
Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236: 492–500
Edye M, Salky B, Posner A, Fierer A (1998) Sac excision is essential to adequate laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 12: 1259–1263
Treacy PJ, Jamieson GG (1987) An approach to the management of paraesophageal hiatus hernias. Aust NZ J Surg 57: 813–817
Dahlberg PS, Deschamps C, Miller DL (2001) Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia 72: 1125–1129
Targarona EM, Novell J, Vela S (2004) Mid term analysis of safety and quality of life after the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 18: 1045–1050
Ellis FH, Crozier RE, Shea JA (1986) Paraesophageal hiatus hernia. Arch Surg 121: 416–420
Williamson WA, Ellis FH Jr, Streitz JM Jr (1993) Paraesophageal hiatal hernia: is an antireflux procedure necessary? Ann Thorac Surg 56: 447–452
Hill LD, Tobias JA (1968) Paraesophageal hernia. Arch Surg 96: 735–744
Pearson FG, Cooper JD, Ilves R (1983) Massive hiatal hernia with incarceration: a report of 53 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 35: 45–51
Treacy PJ, Jamieson GG (1987) An approach to the management of para-oesophageal hiatus hernias. Aust NZ J Surg 57: 813–817
Gantert WA, Patti MG, Arcerito M (1998) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. J Am Coll Surg 186: 428–432 [discussion]
Mattar SG, Bowers SP, Galloway KD (2002) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 16: 745–749
Demeester TR, Wernly JA, Bryant GH (1979) Clinical and in vitro analysis of determinants of gastroesophageal competence: a study of the principles of antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 137: 39–46
Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W (1988) The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155: 104–111
Champion JK, Rock D (2003) Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias. Surg Endosc 17: 551–553
Keidar A, Szold A (2003) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia with selective use of mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13: 149–154
Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA (2002) A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs. simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 137: 649–652
Oelschlager BK, Barreca M, Chang L (2003) The use of small intestine submucosa in the repair of paraesophageal hernias: initial observations of a new technique. Am J Surg 186: 4–8
Champion JK, Rock D (2003) Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias. Surg Endosc 17: 551–553
Draaisma WA, Gooszen HG, Tournojj E, Broeders IAMJ (2005) Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 19: 1300–1308
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hazzan, D., Chin, E. & Salky, B. A review of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Eur Surg 39, 174–179 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-007-0325-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-007-0325-5