Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Results of Antegrade Colonic Enema in Adult Patients: Assessment of Functional Results

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This retrospective study reviewed long-term results in a large group of adult patients treated with antegrade colonic enema and antegrade colonic enema combined with a colostomy.

Methods

Retrospective chart review identified 80 patients (64 females, mean age 51) surgically treated between 1993 and 2007 for fecal incontinence or constipation. Surgical treatments included 69 appendicostomies, 13 tapered ileum, 3 cecal tube, and 25 appendicostomy/neoappendicostomy combined with a colostomy. A 44-item questionnaire was mailed considering bowel regimen, complications, bowel function, social function, and quality of life.

Results

Sixty-nine patients were available for follow-up (mean follow-up, 75 months). Thirty patients (38 percent) had surgical complications. Forty-three patients (62 percent) were still performing antegrade continence enema and 8 patients (12 percent) no longer needed it. Accordingly, treatment was successful in 51 patients (74 percent). Twenty-seven patients (63 percent) had side effects. Evaluation of bowel function, social function, and quality of life all showed significant improvement. Antegrade continence enema was successful in patients with neurologic disabilities (67 percent), anorectal injury (53 percent), idiopathic fecal incontinence (50 percent), and idiopathic fecal constipation (42 percent). Antegrade continence enema was successful in patients with constipation, incontinence, and mixed symptoms. Results did not differ between appendicostomy, neoappendicostomy, and the combined appendicostomy/neoappendicostomy and colostomy.

Conclusion

Long-term results were favorable in most patients treated with antegrade continence enema for fecal incontinence or constipation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitrofanoff P. Trans-appendicular continent cystostomy in the management of the neurogenic bladder. Chir Pediatr 1980;21:297–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM. Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 1990;336:1217–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koyle MA, Kaji DM, Duque M, et al. The Malone antegrade continence enema for neurogenic and structural fecal incontinence and constipation. J Urol 1995;154:759–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Squire R, Kiely EM, Carr B, et al. The clinical application of the Malone antegrade colonic enema. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:1012–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall J, Hutson JM, Anticich N, et al. Antegrade continence enemas in the treatment of slow-transit constipation. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:1227–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krogh K, Laurberg S. Malone antegrade continence enema for fecal incontinence and constipation in adults. Br J Surg 1998;85:974–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerharz EW, Vik V, Webb G, et al. The value of the MACE (Malone antegrade colonic enema) procedure in adult patients. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:544–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Teichman JM, Harris JM, Currie DM, et al. Malone antegrade continence enema for adults with neurogenic bowel disease. J Urol 1998;160:1278–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Christensen P, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management in spinal cord-injured patients. Gastroenterology 2006;131:738–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Christensen P, Kvitzau B, Krogh K, et al. Neurogenic colorectal dysfunction - use of new antegrade and retrograde colonic washout methods. Spinal Cord 2000;38:255–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen P, Buntzen S, Krogh K, et al. Ileal neoappendicostomy for antegrade colonic irrigation. Br J Surg 2001;88:1637–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fonkalsrud EW, Dunn JCY, Kawaguchi AI. Simplified technique for antegrade continence enemas for fecal retention and incontinence. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:457–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerharz EW, Vik V, Webb G, et al. The in situ appendix in the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure for fecal incontinence. Br J Urol 1997;79:985–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Herndon CD, Cain MP, Casale AJ, et al. The colon flap/extension Malone antegrade continence enema: an alternative to the Monti-Malone antegrade continence enema. J Urol 2005;174:299–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurzrock EA, Karpman E, Stone AR. Colonic tubes for the antegrade continence enema: comparison of surgical technique. J Urol 2004;172:700–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Monti PR, Lara RC, Dutra MA, et al. New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology 1997;49:112–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tackett LD, Minevich E, Benedict JF, et al. Appendiceal versus ileal segment for antegrade continence enema. J Urol 2002;167:683–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiser AC, Stock JA, Hanna MK. Modified cecal flap neoappendix for the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: a novel technique. J Urol 2003;169:2321–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kotanagi H, Koyama K, Sato Y, et al. Appendicostomy irrigation for facilitating colonic evacuation in colostomy patients. Preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1050–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Herndon CD, Rink RC, Cain MP, et al. In situ Malone antegrade continence enema in 127 patients: a 6-year experience. J Urol 2004;172:1689–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Teichman JM, Zabihi N, Kraus SR, et al. Long-term results for malone antegrade continence enema for adults with neurogenic bowel disease. Urology 2003;61:502–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Malone PS, Curry JI, Osborne A. The antegrade continence enema procedure why, when and how? World J Urol 1998;16:274–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marsh PJ, Kiff ES. Ileocaecostomy: an alternative surgical procedure for antegrade colonic enema. Br J Surg 1996;83:507–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirst GR, Arumugam PJ, Watkins AJ, et al. Antegrade continence enema in the treatment of obstructed defecation with or without fecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 2005;9:217–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lees NP, Hodson P, Hill J, et al. Long-term results of the antegrade continent enema procedure for constipation in adults. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:362–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Giraudo G, et al. Outcome of antegrade continence enema procedures for fecal incontinence in adults. Br J Surg 2006;93:1265–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. DeFoor W, Minevich E, Reddy P, et al. Perforation of Malone antegrade continence enema: diagnosis and management. J Urol 2005;174:1644–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Furlan JC, Urbach DR, Fehlings MG. Optimal treatment for severe neurogenic bowel dysfunction after chronic spinal cord injury: a decision analysis. Br J Surg 2007;94:1139–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Rubini D, et al. Long-term functional assessment of antegrade colonic enema for combined incontinence and constipation using a modified Marsh and Kiff technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1023–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kiely EM, Ade-Ajayi N, Wheeler RA. Caecal flap conduit for antegrade continence enemas. Br J Surg 1994;81:1215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, et al. Malone antegrade colonic irrigation: ileal neoappendicostomy is the preferred procedure in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:458–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mowatt G, Glazener C, Jarrett M. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 Jul 18;3:CD004464.

  33. Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, et al. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:725–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Holzer B, Rosen HR, Novi G, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for neurogenic fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2007;94:749–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rothbarth J, Bemelman WA, Meijerink WJ, et al. What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:67–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Worsøe M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Worsøe, J., Christensen, P., Krogh, K. et al. Long-Term Results of Antegrade Colonic Enema in Adult Patients: Assessment of Functional Results. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1523–1528 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9401-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9401-6

Key words

Navigation