Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of the Cleft Lift Procedure in the Management of Nonacute Pilonidal Disorders

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

We report the results of the cleft lift procedure in the management of nonacute pilonidal sinus disorders.

Methods

Seventy consecutive patients who underwent a cleft lift for nonacute pilonidal sinus were evaluated prospectively. Responses to a postal questionnaire were analyzed for long-term outcome.

Results

All patients who fulfilled the criteria for day-case were operated on as such. Sixty-six patients achieved complete wound healing within six weeks. Delayed wound healing occurred in three patients and nonhealing occurred in one. Fourteen patients had one or more complications: wound breakdown, superficial (n = 7) and deep (n = 1); wound infection (n = 5); wound seroma (n = 4); and early recurrence (n = 1). The median time off work and to return to normal activities was two and four weeks, respectively (range, 0.5–12). Forty-seven patients completed the questionnaire at a median follow-up of 24 months: five patients reported minimal tenderness in the sacral region; none reported recurrence of pilonidal symptoms; and all were satisfied.

Conclusions

The cleft lift procedure is easy to perform as a day-case procedure. It is associated with high rates of primary healing, durable low recurrence rates, and early functional recovery. This technique may be the procedure of choice in the surgical management of nonacute pilonidal disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Soreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:39–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davage ON. The origin of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinuses: based on an analysis of four hundred sixty-three cases. Am J Pathol 1954;30:1191–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen-Mersh TG. Pilonidal sinus: finding the right track for treatment. Br J Surg 1990;77:123–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:3–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. ANZ J Surg 1992;62:385–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bascom J, Bascom T. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg 2002;137:1146–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bascom J. Pilonidal sinus: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment. Surgery 1980;87:567–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bascom J. Pilonidal sinus. In: Fazio VW. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Toronto: B.C. Decker, 1990:32–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet 1973;2:1414–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitchen PR. Pilonidal sinus: experience with the Karydakis flap. Br J Surg 1996;83:1452–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bascom J. Pilonidal disease: long-term results of follicle removal. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:800–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Senapati A, Cripps N, Thompson M. Bascom’s operation in the day-surgical management of symptomatic pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg 2000;87:1067–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parvaiz A, Kennedy R. Bascom’s procedure in the day-surgical management of symptomatic pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg 2001;88:155–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bascom J, Bascom T. Utility of the cleft lift procedure in refractory pilonidal disease. Am J Surg 2007;193:606–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dewigt R, Maloy J. Pilonidal sinus, experience with 449 cases. N Engl J Med 1953;249:926–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Akinci OF, Bozer M, Uzunkoy A, Duzgun SA, Cokun A. Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg 1999;165:339–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hospital Episode Statistics. Available at: http://www.doh.gov.uk/hes/standard_data/available_tables/main_operations/tb02100e.xls. January 2000.

  18. Akinci OF, Coskun A, Ozgonul A, Terzi A. Surgical treatment of complicated pilonidal disease: limited separate elliptical excision with primary closure. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:704–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Erdem E, Sungurtekin U, Near M. Are postoperative drains necessary with the Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus? Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1427–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Notaras MJ. A review of three popular methods of treatment of postanal (pilonidal) sinus disease. Br J Surg 1970;57:886–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP, Ludwig K. Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1458–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank all the consultants in the Department of General Surgery at York Hospital for their generous support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, York District Hospital, York, United Kingdom

    Ayman S. Abdelrazeq M.Sc., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S.(Gen. Surg.), Mujeeb Rahman F.R.C.S. & David J. Alexander M.S., F.R.C.S.

  2. Department of General Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom

    Ayman S. Abdelrazeq M.Sc., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S.(Gen. Surg.) & Ian D. Botterill M.A., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S.(Gen. Surg.)

Authors
  1. Ayman S. Abdelrazeq M.Sc., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S.(Gen. Surg.)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mujeeb Rahman F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ian D. Botterill M.A., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S.(Gen. Surg.)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David J. Alexander M.S., F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayman S. Abdelrazeq M.Sc., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S.(Gen. Surg.).

About this article

Cite this article

Abdelrazeq, A.S., Rahman, M., Botterill, I.D. et al. Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of the Cleft Lift Procedure in the Management of Nonacute Pilonidal Disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1100–1106 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9262-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9262-z

Key words

Search

Navigation