Abstract
Purpose
High-risk patients with Stage II colon cancer may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, but they are difficult to identify. We assessed the value of tumor budding, defined as small clusters of undifferentiated cancer cells at invasive margins, as a predictor of outcomes in patients with Stage II colon cancer.
Methods
We studied a total of 200 patients with Stage II colon cancer who underwent curative surgery. With hematoxylin and eosin-stained specimens, the degree of tumor budding was classified as low-grade or high-grade. The survival rate of patients who had Stage II disease with low-grade or high-grade tumor budding was compared with that of 226 patients who had Stage III colon cancer.
Results
Univariate analysis revealed that serosal surface involvement (P = 0.04) and tumor budding (P < 0.001) were significantly related to survival. Cumulative five- and ten-year survival rates differed significantly between patients with low-grade tumor budding (93.9 and 90.6 percent, respectively) and those with high-grade (73.9 and 67.8 percent, respectively). Survival rates did not differ significantly between patients with Stage II disease who had high-grade tumor budding and patients with Stage III disease. Cox’s regression analysis demonstrated that tumor budding (hazard ratio, 4.89; P < 0.001) and serosal surface involvement (hazard ratio, 2.561; P = 0.023) were independent prognostic factors. Liver (P < 0.001) and peritoneal (P = 0.003) metastases were more frequent in the patients with high-grade tumor budding than in those with low-grade.
Conclusions
Tumor budding is useful for prognosis and identifying patients with Stage II colon cancer who have a high risk of disease recurrence after curative surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc., 2002.
Macdonald JS, Astrow AB. Adjuvant therapy of colon cancer. Semin Oncol 2001;28:30–40.
Merkel S, Wein A, Günther K, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P. High-risk groups of patients with Stage II colon carcinoma. Cancer 2001;92:1435–43.
Burdy G, Panis Y, Alves A, Nemeth J, Lavergne-Slove A, Valleur P. Identifying patients with T3-T4 node-negative colon cancer at high risk of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1682–8.
Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Bokey EL, Newland RC, Sinclair G. Adverse histopathological findings as a guide to patient management after curative resection of node-positive colonic cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:349–54.
Porschen R, Bermann A, Löffler T, Haack G, Rettig K, Anger Y, Strohmeyer G. Fluorouracil plus leucovorin as effective adjuvant chemotherapy in curatively resected Stage III colon cancer: results of the trial adjCCA-01. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:1787–94.
Tanaka M, Hashiguchi Y, Ueno H, Hase K, Mochizuki H. Tumor budding at the invasive margin can predict patients at high risk of recurrence after curative surgery for Stage II, T3 colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1054–9.
Okuyama T, Nakamura T, Yamaguchi M. Budding is useful to select high-risk patients in Stage II well-differentiated or moderately differentiated colon adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1400–6.
Okuyama T, Oya M, Ishikawa H. Budding as a useful prognostic marker in pT3 well- or moderately differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2003;83:42–7.
Ueno H, Murphy J, Jass JR, Mochizuki H, Talbot IC. Tumour ‘budding’ as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer. Histopathology 2002;40:127–32.
Okuyama T, Oya M, Yamaguchi M. Budding (sprouting) as a useful prognostic marker in colorectal mucinous carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2002;32:412–6.
Park K-J, Choi H-J, Roh M-S, Kwon H-C, Kim C. Intensity of tumor budding and its prognostic implications in invasive colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1597–602.
Morodomi T, Isomoto H, Shirouzu K, Kakegawa K, Irie K, Morimatsu M. An index for estimating the probability of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancers: lymph node metastasis and the histopathology of actively invasive regions of cancer. Cancer 1989;63:539–43.
Hase K, Shatney C, Johnson D, Trollope M, Vierra M. Prognostic value of tumor “budding” in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:627–35.
Mitomi H, Mori A, Kanazawa H, et al. Venous invasion and down-regulation of p21WAF1/CIP1 are associated with metastasis in colorectal carcinomas. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2005;52:1421–6.
Okuyama T, Oya M, Ishikawa H. Budding as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:628–34.
Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Kikuchi S, Ohtani Y, Sato K. Evaluation of the usefulness of tumor budding on the prediction of metastasis to the lung and liver after curative excision of colorectal cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2005;52:1432–5.
Gabbert H, Wagner R, Moll R, Gerharz C-D. Tumor dedifferentiation: an important step in tumor invasion. Clin Expl Metastasis 1985;3:257–79.
Masaki T, Matsuoka H, Sugiyama M, et al. Laminin-5 γ 2 chain expression as a possible determinant of tumor aggressiveness in T1 colorectal carcinomas. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:272–8.
Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Matsuoka H, et al. Coexpression of matrilysin and laminin-5 γ2 chain may contribute to tumor cell migration in colorectal carcinomas. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1262–7.
Guziñska-Ustymowicz K, Zalewski B, Kasacka I, Piotrowski Z, Skrzydlewska E. Activity of cathepsin B and D in colorectal cancer: relationships with tumour budding. Anticancer Res 2004;24:2847–52.
Jass JR, Baker M, Fraser L, et al. APC mutation and tumour budding in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:69–73.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank M. Yokozawa and I. Yokoyama, Department of Pathology, Kitasato University East Hospital, for their expert technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Nakamura, T., Mitomi, H., Kanazawa, H. et al. Tumor Budding as an Index to Identify High-Risk Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 568–572 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9192-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9192-9