Abstract
Purpose
This study was designed to determine whether incidental splenectomy for iatrogenic injury affects long-term cancer-specific survival in patients having resection of an adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid or rectum.
Methods
A retrospective case-matched review of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer with incidental splenectomy between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1999 was undertaken. Data were analysed for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, gender, disease stage, operation type, and outcome. These cases were matched with patients from the same center, of the same age and gender, with the same stage of disease and operation, who did not require a splenectomy at the time of their surgery.
Results
Fifty-five patients were identified who had an iatrogenic splenectomy. Matched gender, stage, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-matched controls were identified. Follow-up from time of surgery to death or last follow-up ranged from 2 to 205 (median, 43) months. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model to define the statistical significance found a significant difference between the groups favoring those without splenectomy (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval (CI), 1–3.3; P = 0.0399). Cancer-specific survival at five years was 70 vs. 47 percent and at ten years was 55 vs. 38 percent.
Discussion
Patients with colorectal cancer who had splenectomy as a result of iatrogenic damage of the spleen while undergoing resection of the sigmoid or rectum for adenocarcinoma had a significantly worse prognosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shaw JH, Print CG. Postsplenectomy sepsis. Br J Surg 1989;76:1074–81.
Suehiro S, Nagasue N, Ogawa Y, Sasaki Y, Hirose S, Yukaya H. The negative effect of splenectomy on the prognosis of gastric cancer. Am J Surg 1984;148:645–8.
Shen JG, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Adverse effect of splenectomy on recurrence in total gastrectomy cancer patients with perioperative transfusion. Am J Surg 2006;192:301–5.
Saji S, Sakamoto J, Teramukai S, et al. Impact of splenectomy and immunochemotherapy on survival following gastrectomy for carcinoma: covariate interaction with immunosuppressive acidic protein, a serum marker for the host immune system. Tumor Marker Committee for the Study Group of Immunochemotherapy with PSK for Gastric Cancer. Surg Today 1999;29:504–10.
Gockel I, Kneist W, Junginger T. Influence of splenectomy on perioperative morbidity and long-term survival after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2005;18:311–5.
Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, Conlon K. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2004;240:293–8.
Schwarz RE, Harrison LE, Conlon KC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. The impact of splenectomy on outcomes after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:516–21.
Davis CJ, Ilstrup DM, Pemberton JH. Influence of splenectomy on survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 1988;155:173–9.
Varty PP, Linehan IP, Boulos PB. Does concurrent splenectomy at colorectal cancer resection influence survival? Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:602–6.
Konstadoulakis MM, Kymionis GD, Leandros E, et al. Long-term effect of splenectomy on patients operated on for cancer of the left colon: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg 1999;165:583–7.
Fletcher J. Subgroup analyses: how to avoid being misled. BMJ 2007;335:96–7.
Cook DI, Gebski VJ, Keech AC Subgroup analysis in clinical trails. In: Keech A, Gebski V, Pike R. Interpreting and reporting clinical trials. Sydney, Australia: Medical Journal of Australia, 2007:105–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Reprints are not available.
About this article
Cite this article
Wakeman, C.J., Dobbs, B.R., Frizelle, F.A. et al. The Impact of Splenectomy on Outcome After Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Nested, Paired Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 213–217 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9139-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9139-6