Abstract
Purpose
Perineal body is considered by investigators as a fibromuscular structure that is the site of insertion of perineal muscles. We investigated the hypothesis that perineal body is the site across which perineal muscles pass uninterrupted from one side to the other.
Methods
Perineal body was studied in 56 cadaveric specimens (46 adults, 10 neonatal deaths) by direct dissection with the help of magnifying loupe, fine surgical instruments, and bright light.
Results
Perineal body consisted of three layers: 1) superficial layer, which consisted of fleshy fibers of the external anal sphincter extending across perineal body to become the bulbospongiosus muscle; 2) tendinous extension of superficial transverse perineal muscle crossing perineal body to contralateral superficial transverse perineal muscle, with which it formed a criss-cross pattern; and 3) tendinous fibers of the deep transverse perineal muscle; the fibers crossing perineal body decussated in criss-cross pattern with the contralateral deep transverse perineal muscle. A relation of levator ani or puborectalis muscles to perineal body could not be identified.
Conclusions
Perineal body (central perineal tendon) is not the site of insertion of perineal muscles but the site along which muscle fibers of these muscles and the external anal sphincter pass uninterrupted from one side to the other. Such a free passage from one muscle to the other seems to denote a “digastric pattern” for the perineal muscles. Perineal body is subjected to injury or continuous intra-abdominal pressure variations, which may eventually result in perineocele, enterocele, or sigmoidocele.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Skandalakis JE. Perineum. In: Skandalakis JE, ed. Skandalakis surgical anatomy. The embryologic and anatomic basis of modern surgery. Athens: Pascalidis Medical Publications, 2004:1618–40.
McMinn RM. Perineum. In: McMinn RM, ed. Last’s anatomy: regional and applied. 8th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1990:400–11
Skomorowska E, Hegedus V, Christiansen J. Evaluation of perineal descent by defecography. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;13:191–4.
Shafik A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. XVIII. The levator dysfunction syndrome. A new syndrome with report of 7 cases. Coloproctology 1983;5:159–65.
Timmons MC, Addison WA, Addison SB, et al. Abdominal sacral colopexy in 163 women with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Evaluation of operative techniques. J Reprod Med 1992;37:323–7.
Ho YH, Goh HS. The neurophysiological significance of perineal descent. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:107–11.
Klein MC, Janssen PA, MacWilliam L, et al. Determinants of vaginal-perineal integrity and pelvic floor functioning in childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:403–10.
Gufler H, Laubenberger J, De Gregorio G, et al. Pelvic floor descent: dynamic MR imaging using a half-Fourier RARE sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:378–83.
Henriksen TB, Bek KM, Hedegaard M, et al. Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomy. BMJ 1994;309:1255–8.
Helewa ME. Episiotomy and severe perineal trauma: of science and fiction. Can Med Assoc J 1997;156:811–3.
Labrecque M, Baillargeon L, Dallaire M, et al. Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women. Can Med Assoc 1997;156:797–802.
Meyers-Helfgott MG, Helfgott AW. Routine use of episiotomy in modern obstetrics: should it be performed? Obstet Gynecol Clin 1999;26:305–25.
Woodman PJ, Graney DO. Anatomy and physiology of the female perineal body with relevance to obstetrical injury and repair. Clin Anat 2002;15:321–34.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Margot Yehia for assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Shafik, A., Sibai, O.E., Shafik, A.A. et al. A Novel Concept for the Surgical Anatomy of the Perineal Body. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 2120–2125 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9064-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9064-8