Skip to main content
Log in

Pudendal Block with Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

Postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy is very intense, and the pain at the first postoperative defecation is very intense. Based on our pilot initial results that reflected reduced postoperative pain, we conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to investigate whether the analgesia produced by bilateral pudendal nerve block using a nerve-stimulator could provide better postoperative pain relief compared with the routine technique in use in the Department of Anesthesia.

Methods

After Ethical Committee approval and informed consent, 100 patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were randomized into control (C) and study (P) groups with 50 patients each. Bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.25 percent bupivacaine was performed with nerve-stimulator. Evaluated parameters were pain severity, duration of analgesia, demand analgesia, and possible technique-related complications. Data were evaluated 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery completion. The first defecation and patient satisfaction were recorded.

Results

Successful pudendal nerves stimulation was achieved in all patients in the study group. The pudendal nerve block group was found to have better postoperative pain relief, reduced need for analgesics, and patient satisfaction. Mean analgesic duration was 23.8 ± 4.8 hours vs. 3.6 ± 1 hours. All patients in the pudendal nerve block had spontaneous micturition vs. 48 patients in the control group. The pudendal analgesia was considered excellent by 44 patients and satisfactory by 6 male patients. The six male patients complained because of penile anesthesia. No anesthetic-related local or systemic complications were observed.

Conclusions

In this controlled study, bilateral pudendal nerve block oriented by nerve stimulator provided excellent analgesia with low need for opioids, without local or systemic complications, and without urinary retention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Detmer DE. Ambulatory surgery. N Engl J Med 1981;305:1406–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith LE. Ambulatory surgery for anorectal diseases: an update. South Med J 1986;79:163–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrara A, Gallagher J. The physician-owned ambulatory surgery center for colon and rectal surgery. In: Bailey HR, Snyder MJ, eds. Ambulatory anorectal surgery. New York: Springer, 1999:16;13–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999;89:652–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rawal N, Hylander J, Nydahl PA, et al. Survey of postoperative analgesia following ambulatory surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1017–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, et al. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg 2000;90:1402–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Singely FJ, Aye F, Gouverneur JM. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block: an original technique to provide postoperative analgesia for foot surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;84:383–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins L, Halwani A, Vaghadia H. Impact of a regional anesthesia analgesia program for outpatient foot surgery. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:840–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mezei G, Chung F. Return hospital visits and hospital readmissions after ambulatory surgery. Ann Surg 1999;230:721–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Avidan A, Drenger B, Ginosar Y. Peripheral nerve block for ambulatory surgery and postoperative analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2003;16:567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li S, Coloma M, White PF, et al. Comparison of the costs and recovery profiles of three anesthetic techniques for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1225–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheppard R. Pudendal nerve. In: Hahn MB, McQuillan PM, Sheplock GJ, eds. Regional anesthesia: an atlas of anatomy and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1996:267–71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Imbelloni LE, Beato L, Beato C, Cordeiro JA, Souza DD. Bilateral pudendal nerves block for postoperative analgesia with 0.25 percent S75:R25 bupivacaine. Pilot study on outpatient hemorrhoidectomy. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2005;55:614–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Møiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief. The role of timing analgesia. Anesthesiology 2002;96:725–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gabrielli F, Cioffi U, Chiarelli M, et al. Hemorrhoidectomy with posterior perineal block. Experience with 400 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:809–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nivatvongs S. An improved technique of local anesthesia for anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:259–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nivatvongs S. Techniques of local anesthesia for anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roswell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;35:779–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Naja Z, Ziade MF, Lönnqvist PA. Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain. Can J Anesth 2005;52:62–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scudamore JH, Yates MJ. Pudendal block: a misnomer?. Lancet 1966;1:23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jirasiritham S, Tantivitayatan K, Jirasiritham S. Perianal blockage with 0.5-percent bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief in hemorrhoidectomy. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:660–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McConnell JC, Khubchandani IT. Long-term follow-up of closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;75:797–9.s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prasad ML, Abarian H. Urinary retention following operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:490–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamphuis ET, Ionescu TI, Kuipers PW, et al. Recovery of storage and emptying functions of the urinary bladder after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and with bupivacaine in men. Anesthesiology 1998;88:310–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Naja Z, Hassan MJel, Khatib H, Ziade MF, Lönnqvist PA. Combined sciatic-paravertebral nerve block vs. general anesthesia for fractured hip of the elderly: reduced need for postoperative intensive care monitoring. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2000;15:559–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gottschalk A, Smith DS. New concepts in acute pain therapy: preemptive analgesia. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:1979–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chauvin M. State of the art or pain treatment following ambulatory surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luiz Eduardo Imbelloni M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Imbelloni, L.E., Vieira, E.M., Gouveia, M.A. et al. Pudendal Block with Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 1656–1661 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0216-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0216-7

Key words

Navigation