Purpose
Postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy is very intense, and the pain at the first postoperative defecation is very intense. Based on our pilot initial results that reflected reduced postoperative pain, we conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to investigate whether the analgesia produced by bilateral pudendal nerve block using a nerve-stimulator could provide better postoperative pain relief compared with the routine technique in use in the Department of Anesthesia.
Methods
After Ethical Committee approval and informed consent, 100 patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were randomized into control (C) and study (P) groups with 50 patients each. Bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.25 percent bupivacaine was performed with nerve-stimulator. Evaluated parameters were pain severity, duration of analgesia, demand analgesia, and possible technique-related complications. Data were evaluated 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery completion. The first defecation and patient satisfaction were recorded.
Results
Successful pudendal nerves stimulation was achieved in all patients in the study group. The pudendal nerve block group was found to have better postoperative pain relief, reduced need for analgesics, and patient satisfaction. Mean analgesic duration was 23.8 ± 4.8 hours vs. 3.6 ± 1 hours. All patients in the pudendal nerve block had spontaneous micturition vs. 48 patients in the control group. The pudendal analgesia was considered excellent by 44 patients and satisfactory by 6 male patients. The six male patients complained because of penile anesthesia. No anesthetic-related local or systemic complications were observed.
Conclusions
In this controlled study, bilateral pudendal nerve block oriented by nerve stimulator provided excellent analgesia with low need for opioids, without local or systemic complications, and without urinary retention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Detmer DE. Ambulatory surgery. N Engl J Med 1981;305:1406–9.
Smith LE. Ambulatory surgery for anorectal diseases: an update. South Med J 1986;79:163–6.
Ferrara A, Gallagher J. The physician-owned ambulatory surgery center for colon and rectal surgery. In: Bailey HR, Snyder MJ, eds. Ambulatory anorectal surgery. New York: Springer, 1999:16;13–6.
Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999;89:652–8.
Rawal N, Hylander J, Nydahl PA, et al. Survey of postoperative analgesia following ambulatory surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1017–22.
Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, et al. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg 2000;90:1402–5.
Singely FJ, Aye F, Gouverneur JM. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block: an original technique to provide postoperative analgesia for foot surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;84:383–6.
Collins L, Halwani A, Vaghadia H. Impact of a regional anesthesia analgesia program for outpatient foot surgery. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:840–5.
Mezei G, Chung F. Return hospital visits and hospital readmissions after ambulatory surgery. Ann Surg 1999;230:721–7.
Avidan A, Drenger B, Ginosar Y. Peripheral nerve block for ambulatory surgery and postoperative analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2003;16:567–73.
Li S, Coloma M, White PF, et al. Comparison of the costs and recovery profiles of three anesthetic techniques for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1225–30.
Sheppard R. Pudendal nerve. In: Hahn MB, McQuillan PM, Sheplock GJ, eds. Regional anesthesia: an atlas of anatomy and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1996:267–71.
Imbelloni LE, Beato L, Beato C, Cordeiro JA, Souza DD. Bilateral pudendal nerves block for postoperative analgesia with 0.25 percent S75:R25 bupivacaine. Pilot study on outpatient hemorrhoidectomy. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2005;55:614–21.
Møiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief. The role of timing analgesia. Anesthesiology 2002;96:725–41.
Gabrielli F, Cioffi U, Chiarelli M, et al. Hemorrhoidectomy with posterior perineal block. Experience with 400 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:809–12.
Nivatvongs S. An improved technique of local anesthesia for anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:259–60.
Nivatvongs S. Techniques of local anesthesia for anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1128.
Roswell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;35:779–81.
Naja Z, Ziade MF, Lönnqvist PA. Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain. Can J Anesth 2005;52:62–8.
Scudamore JH, Yates MJ. Pudendal block: a misnomer?. Lancet 1966;1:23.
Jirasiritham S, Tantivitayatan K, Jirasiritham S. Perianal blockage with 0.5-percent bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief in hemorrhoidectomy. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:660–4.
McConnell JC, Khubchandani IT. Long-term follow-up of closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;75:797–9.s
Prasad ML, Abarian H. Urinary retention following operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:490–2.
Kamphuis ET, Ionescu TI, Kuipers PW, et al. Recovery of storage and emptying functions of the urinary bladder after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and with bupivacaine in men. Anesthesiology 1998;88:310–6.
Naja Z, Hassan MJel, Khatib H, Ziade MF, Lönnqvist PA. Combined sciatic-paravertebral nerve block vs. general anesthesia for fractured hip of the elderly: reduced need for postoperative intensive care monitoring. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2000;15:559–68.
Gottschalk A, Smith DS. New concepts in acute pain therapy: preemptive analgesia. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:1979–84.
Chauvin M. State of the art or pain treatment following ambulatory surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:3–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Imbelloni, L.E., Vieira, E.M., Gouveia, M.A. et al. Pudendal Block with Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 1656–1661 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0216-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0216-7