Purpose
Local recurrence after curative excision for rectal cancer is frequently regarded as a failure of surgery. The macroscopic quality of the excised mesorectum after total mesorectal excision has been proposed as a means of assessment of the adequacy of surgery. This study was designed to determine the utility of mesorectal grading in prediction of local and overall recurrence after curative surgery.
Methods
All patients undergoing resection for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum had a mesorectal grading prospectively applied to their resection specimens, according to the classification proposed by Quirke et al. (Grades 1–3; 3 is the best). The outcome of patients undergoing potentially curative surgery from 2001 to 2003 was reviewed. Prognostic significance of mesorectal grades was determined by multivariate regression analyses.
Results
A total of 130 patients with a median follow-up of 26 (range, 17–42) months were studied. The local and overall recurrences were 8.4 and 15 percent, respectively. The mesorectum was reported as Grade 3 in 61 patients (47 percent), Grade 2 in 52 patients (40 percent), and Grade 1 in 17 patients (13 percent). Patients with Grade 1 mesorectum had 41 percent local recurrence and 59 percent overall recurrence, respectively. However, patients with Grade 2 and Grade 3 mesorectum had 5.7 and 1.6 percent local recurrences, respectively, and 17 and 1.6 percent overall recurrence, respectively. By Cox’s regression analysis, grade of mesorectum independently influenced both local and overall recurrences.
Conclusions
The macroscopic quality of mesorectum after curative excision of rectal cancer is an important predictor of local and overall recurrences. The mesorectal grades may be of value in decisions regarding postoperative adjuvant therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C Willett JE Tepper A Cohen E Orlow C Welch G Donaldson (1984) ArticleTitleLocal failure following curative resection of colonic adenocarcinoma Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 10 645–651 Occurrence Handle6735753 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2c3jvFWhtg%3D%3D
RK Phillips R Hittinger L Blesovsky JS Fry LP Fielding (1984) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence following “curative” surgery for large bowel cancer: II. The rectum and rectosigmoid Br J Surg 71 17–20 Occurrence Handle6689963 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2c%2FotFejsA%3D%3D
JK MacFarlane RD Ryall RJ Heald (1993) ArticleTitleMesorectal excision for rectal cancer Lancet 341 457–460 Occurrence Handle8094488 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0140-6736(93)90207-W Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s7msVOksQ%3D%3D
A Wibe PR Rendedal E Svensson et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 89 327–334 Occurrence Handle11872058 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02024.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jslequg%3D%3D
E Kapiteijn CA Marijnen ID Nagtegaal et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer N Engl J Med 345 638–646 Occurrence Handle11547717 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa010580 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvps1ektw%3D%3D
P Quirke P Durdey MF Dixon NS Williams (1986) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathologic study of lateral tumor spread and surgical excision Lancet 2 996–999 Occurrence Handle2430152 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92612-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2FjvVeksw%3D%3D
AM Abulafi NS Williams (1994) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy Br J Surg 81 7–19 Occurrence Handle8313126 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c7kslWjtw%3D%3D
IJ Adam MO Mohamdee IG Martin et al. (1994) ArticleTitleRole of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer Lancet 344 707–711 Occurrence Handle7915774 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92206-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czlvFeisw%3D%3D
H Nelson N Petrelli A Carlin et al. (2001) ArticleTitleGuidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery J Natl Cancer Inst 93 583–596 Occurrence Handle11309435 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/93.8.583 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hvFejtg%3D%3D
GA Porter CL Soskolne WW Yakimets SC Newman (1998) ArticleTitleSurgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer Ann Surg 227 157–167 Occurrence Handle9488510 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199802000-00001 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7kslygtg%3D%3D
ID Nagtegaal CJ Velde Particlevan de E Worp Particlevan der E Kapiteijn P Quirke JH Krieken Particlevan (2002) ArticleTitleMacroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control J Clin Oncol 20 1729–1734 Occurrence Handle11919228 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2002.07.010
P Quirke MF Dixon (1988) ArticleTitleThe prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathologic examination Int J Colorectal Dis 3 127–131 Occurrence Handle3045231 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01645318 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1czhs1Sjug%3D%3D
G Porter (1999) ArticleTitleSurgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer treatment Int J Surg Investig 1 257–258 Occurrence Handle11341621 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzotFOqtA%3D%3D
RD Kingston S Walsh J Jeacock (1992) ArticleTitleColorectal surgeons in district general hospitals produce similar survival outcomes to their teaching hospital colleagues: review of 5-year survivals in Manchester J R Coll Surg Edinb 37 235–237 Occurrence Handle1383517 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FitVKrsQ%3D%3D
ID Nagtegaal CA Marijnen EK Kranenbarg CJ Velde Particlevan de JH Krieken Particlevan (2002) ArticleTitleCircumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit Am J Surg Pathol 26 350–357 Occurrence Handle11859207 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000478-200203000-00009
C Volpe M Rodrigues-Bigas NJ Petrelli (1996) ArticleTitleWide perineal dissection and its effect on local recurrence following potentially curative abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma Cancer Invest 14 1–5 Occurrence Handle8597886 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287nvV2itQ%3D%3D
PP Tekkis AG Heriot J Smith et al. (2005) ArticleTitleComparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer Colorectal Dis 7 369–374 Occurrence Handle15932561 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00767.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3oslOqtg%3D%3D
CC Compton (2002) ArticleTitlePathologic prognostic factors in the recurrence of rectal cancer Clin Colorectal Cancer 2 149–160 Occurrence Handle12482331 Occurrence Handle10.3816/CCC.2002.n.020
S Bulow IJ Christensen H Harling O Kronborg C Fenger HJ Nielsen (2003) ArticleTitleRecurrence and survival after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 90 974–980 Occurrence Handle12905551 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4137 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szntVSlug%3D%3D
Anonymous (1997) ArticleTitleImproved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial N Engl J Med 336 980–987 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199704033361402
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented at the meeting of the European Association of Coloproctology, Bologna, Italy, September 15 to 17, 2005.
About this article
Cite this article
Maslekar, S., Sharma, A., MacDonald, A. et al. Mesorectal Grades Predict Recurrences After Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 168–175 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0756-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0756-2