Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of Histologic Type of Primary Lesion and Metastatic Lymph Nodes as a Prognostic Factor in Stage III Colon Cancer

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate whether the histologic types of the primary lesion and of metastatic lymph nodes in Stage III colon cancer are useful as prognostic factors. The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized, controlled trial by using these prognostic factors as stratification criteria was also investigated.

Methods

Stage III colon cancer patients were enrolled and were divided into two groups: Group W, in which the histologic type of both primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes was well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; and Group U, in which the primary tumors and the metastatic lymph nodes were of any type other than well-differentiated. Group W patients were assigned to Treatment Arm A (surgery alone) or Arm B (surgery, then 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil); and Group U patients, to Treatment Arm C (same as B), and Arm D (surgery + 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil + mitomycin C).

Results

The Group W five-year survival rate was significantly superior to that in Group U (P = 0.0035). There was a better survival rate in Treatment Arm A than Arm B (P = 0.0321), but no difference between Treatment Arms C and D.

Conclusions

In Stage III colon cancer, the prognosis of cases whose primary lesion and lymph node tissues are both well differentiated is extremely good. In such cases, it is possible for adjuvant chemotherapy to have a deleterious effect, and therefore, it is not recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MR Moran EC James DA Rothenberger et al. (1992) ArticleTitlePrognostic value of positive lymph nodes in rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 35 579–581 Occurrence Handle1587177 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B28nosVQ%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02050539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. GJ Allegra S Paik LH Colangelo et al. (2003) ArticleTitlePrognostic valueof thymidylate synthase, ki-67, and p53 in patients with Dukes' B and C colon cancer: A National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Cancerand Bowel Project Collaborative Study J Clin Oncol 21 241–250 Occurrence Handle12525515 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXpsVWqs78%3D Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2003.05.044

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Y Adachi K Yasuda M Inomata et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type Cancer 89 1418–1424 Occurrence Handle11013353 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmslSlsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1418::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO;2-A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. CK Chung RJ Zaino JA Stryker (1982) ArticleTitleColorectal carcinoma: evaluation of histologic grade and factors influencing prognosis J Surg Oncol 21 143–148 Occurrence Handle7132366 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyD3srjt1Q%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. FT McDermott ES Hughes EA Pihl et al. (1984) ArticleTitleInfluence of tumor differentiation on survival after resection for rectal cancer in a series of 1296 patients ANZ J Surg 54 53–58 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuB3c3nt1c%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. K Takahashi T Mori M Yasuno (2000) ArticleTitleHistologic grade of metastatic lymph node and prognosis of rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 43 40–46 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y Koyoma (1981) ArticleTitle1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU): a masked 5-fluorinated pyrimidine Cancer Treat Rev 8 147–151

    Google Scholar 

  8. K Ito A Yamaguchi K Miura et al. (1996) ArticleTitleProspective adjuvant therapy with mitomycin C and carmofur (HCFU) for colorectal cancer, 10-year follow-up: Tokai HCFU study group, the first study for colorectal cancer J Surg Oncol 62 4–9 Occurrence Handle8618399 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjtFGqsrc%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199605)62:1<4::AID-JSO2>3.0.CO;2-D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. K Ito A Yamaguchi K Miura et al. (1996) ArticleTitleOral adjuvant chemotherapy with Carmofur (HCFU) for colorectal cancer: five-year follow-up. Tokai HCFU study group—the third study on colorectal cancer J Surg Oncol 63 107–111 Occurrence Handle8888803 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2czntlU%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199610)63:2<107::AID-JSO7>3.0.CO;2-I

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. K Sugimachi Y Maehara M Ogawa et al. (1996) ArticleTitlePostoperative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer by combining 5-fluorouracil infusion and 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil administration after curative resection Cancer 77 36–43 Occurrence Handle8630937 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XlsV2nsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<36::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-L

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J Sakamoto S Kodaira C Hamada et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAn individual patient data meta-analysis of long supported adjuvant chemotherapy with oral carmofur in patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer Oncol Rep 8 697–703 Occurrence Handle11295105 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjsVSitbg%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. InstitutionalAuthorNameJapanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (1974) Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma EditionNumber5th ed. Kanehara & Co. Ltd. Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  13. DR Taves (1974) ArticleTitleMinimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups Clin Pharmacol Ther 15 443–453 Occurrence Handle4597226 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSuC287jtFI%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. EL Kaplan P Meir (1958) ArticleTitleNon-parametric estimation from incomplete observation J Am Stat Assoc 53 457–481 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2281868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A Martling B Cedermark H Johansson et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer Br J Surg 89 1008–1013 Occurrence Handle12153626 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vgsVaquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02151.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S Popat R Hubner RS Houlston (2005) ArticleTitleSystematical review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis J Clin Oncol 23 609–618 Occurrence Handle15659508 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitVartLY%3D Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2005.01.086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M Tanaka Y Hashiguchi H Ueno et al. (2003) ArticleTitleTumor budding at the invasive margin can predict patients athigh risk of recurrence after curative surgery for stage II, T3 colon cancer Dis Colon Rectum 46 1054–1059 Occurrence Handle12907899 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7280-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. T Okuyama M Oya H Ishikawa (2003) ArticleTitleBudding as a useful prognostic marker in pT3 well- or moderately-differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma J Surg Oncol 83 42–47 Occurrence Handle12722096 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jso.10230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. K Komuta S Okudaira M Haraguchi J Furui T Kanematsu (2001) ArticleTitleIdentification of extracapsular invasion of the metastatic lymph nodes as a useful prognostic sign in patients with resectable colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 44 1838–1844 Occurrence Handle11742171 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MjgtV2isQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. E Mamounas S Wieand N Wolmark et al. (1999) ArticleTitleComparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' C colon cancer: Results from four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04) J Clin Oncol 17 1349–1355 Occurrence Handle10334518 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3msFKrtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. DG Haller PJ Catalano JS Macdonald et al. (1998) ArticleTitleFluorouracil (FU), leucovorin (LV) and levamisole (LEV) adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: five-year final reportof INT-0089 Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17 256

    Google Scholar 

  22. ML Rothenberg AM Oza RH Bigelow et al. (2003) ArticleTitleSuperiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial J Clin Oncol 21 2059–2069 Occurrence Handle12775730 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXpsVGqtL4%3D Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2003.11.126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. LB Saltz JV Cox C Klanke et al. (2000) ArticleTitleIrinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer N Engl J Med 343 905–914 Occurrence Handle11006366 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXntFOkt7Y%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM200009283431302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. T Andre C Boni L Mounedji-Boudiaf et al. (2004) ArticleTitleOxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer N Engl J Med 350 2343–2351 Occurrence Handle15175436 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXks1Gjt78%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa032709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeo Mori M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Mori, T., Hirota, T., Ohashi, Y. et al. Significance of Histologic Type of Primary Lesion and Metastatic Lymph Nodes as a Prognostic Factor in Stage III Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 982–992 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0531-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0531-4

Key words

Navigation