Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship Between External Anal Sphincter Atrophy at Endoanal Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical, Functional, and Anatomic Characteristics in Patients With Fecal Incontinence

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Purpose

External anal sphincter atrophy at endoanal magnetic resonance imaging has been associated with poor outcome of anal sphincter repair. We studied the relationship between external anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical, functional, and anatomic characteristics in patients with fecal incontinence.

Methods

In 200 patients (mean Vaizey score, 18 (±2.9 standard deviation)) magnetic resonance images were evaluated for external anal sphincter atrophy (none, mild, or severe) by radiologists blinded to anorectal functional test results and details from medical history. Subgroups of patients with and without atrophy were compared for medical history, anal manometry, pudendal nerve latency testing, anal sensitivity testing, external anal sphincter thickness, and external anal sphincter defects. Whenever significant differences were detected, we tested for differences between patients with mild and severe atrophy.

Results

External anal sphincter atrophy was demonstrated in 123 patients (62 percent): graded as mild in 79 (40 percent), and severe in 44 patients (22 percent). Patients with atrophy were more often female (P < 0.001) and older (P = 0.003). They had a lower maximal squeeze (P = 0.01) and squeeze increment pressure (P < 0.001). Patients with severe atrophy had a lower maximal squeeze (P = 0.003) and squeeze increment pressure (P < 0.001) than patients with mild atrophy. These effects were not attenuated by potential confounding variables. Patients with atrophy could not be identified a priori by other characteristics.

Conclusions

External anal sphincter atrophy at endoanal magnetic resonance imaging was depicted in 62 percent of patients, varying from mild to severe. Because increasing levels of atrophy were associated with impaired squeeze function, further studies are needed to evaluate whether grading atrophy is clinically valuable in selecting patients for anal sphincter repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. TM Thomas M Egan A Walgrove TW Meade (1984) ArticleTitleThe prevalence of faecal and double incontinence Community Med 6 216–220 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2Fgt1KltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6478780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. M Deutekom MP Terra AC Dobben et al. (2005) ArticleTitleImpact of faecal incontinence severity on health domains Colorectal Dis 7 263–269 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00772.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3isFantw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15859965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. SS Rao (2004) ArticleTitlePathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence Gastroenterology 126 S14–S22 Occurrence Handle10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.013 Occurrence Handle14978634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. F Abbasakoor M Nelson J Beynon B Patel ND Carr (1998) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography in patients with anorectal symptoms after haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 85 1522–1524 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00887.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FjvFGhsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9823915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. MA Kamm (1994) ArticleTitleObstetric damage and faecal incontinence Lancet 344 730–733 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92213-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czlvFeiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7915781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. S Snooks MM Henry M Swash (1984) ArticleTitleFaecal incontinence after anal dilatation Br J Surg 71 617–618 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2c3lvVejtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6743984

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. CT Speakman SJ Burnett MA Kamm CI Bartram (1991) ArticleTitleSphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography Br J Surg 78 1429–1430 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387isleqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1773315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson JM Thomas CI Bartram (1993) ArticleTitleAnal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery N Engl J Med 329 1905–1911 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199312233292601 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Fmslagtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8247054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson CI Bartram (1994) ArticleTitleThird degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair BMJ 308 887–891 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3islGrsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8173367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. AF Engel MA Kamm (1994) ArticleTitleThe acute effect of straining on pelvic floor neurological function Int J Colorectal Dis 9 8–12 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00304293 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czgtVWkuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8027627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. AG Parks M Swash H Urich (1977) ArticleTitleSphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse Gut 18 656–665 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE2s3kslyktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle892613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. RD Madoff SC Parker MG Varma AC Lowry (2004) ArticleTitleFaecal incontinence in adults Lancet 364 621–632 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16856-6 Occurrence Handle15313364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. AJ Malouf CS Norton AF Engel RJ Nicholls MA Kamm (2000) ArticleTitleLong-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma Lancet 355 260–265 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05218-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jslGgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10675072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. R Gilliland DF Altomare H Moreira SuffixJr L Oliveira JE Gilliland SD Wexner (1998) ArticleTitlePudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlappingsphincteroplasty Dis Colon Rectum 41 1516–1522 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237299 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FnsFKktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9860332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PP Jacobs M Scheuer JH Kuijpers MH Vingerhoets (1990) ArticleTitleObstetric fecal incontinence. Role of pelvic floor denervation and results of delayed sphincter repair Dis Colon Rectum 33 494–497 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02052145 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c3ns1WisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2351003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. EE Londono-Schimmer R Garcia-Duperly RJ Nicholls JK Ritchie PR Hawley JP Thomson (1994) ArticleTitleOverlapping anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence due to sphincter trauma: five year follow-up functional results Int J Colorectal Dis 9 110–113 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00699424 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czkt1OrtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8064190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JW Briel J Stoker E Rociu JS Lameris WC Hop WR Schouten (1999) ArticleTitleExternal anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging adversely affects continence after sphincteroplasty Br J Surg 86 1322–1327 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01244.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FgvF2ktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10540142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. NE Diamant MA Kamm A Wald WE Whitehead (1999) ArticleTitleAGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques Gastroenterology 116 735–760 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70195-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7lsFaqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10029632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. PJ Law MA Kamm CI Bartram (1991) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence Br J Surg 78 312–314 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M3hsFCgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2021846

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MA Cuesta S Meijer EJ Derksen H Boutkan SG Meuwissen (1992) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography Dis Colon Rectum 35 59–63 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02053340 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387ivVajtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1733685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. MB Nielsen C Hauge JF Pedersen J Christiansen (1993) ArticleTitleEndosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: findings and influence on surgical management AJR Am J Roentgenol 160 771–775 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s3gs1Omuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8456663

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. KI Deen D Kumar JG Williams J Olliff MR Keighley (1993) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter defects. Correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery Ann Surg 218 201–205 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3szktlKruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8343001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. C Meyenberger P Bertschinger GF Zala P Buchmann (1996) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: correlation between endosonography and surgery Endoscopy 28 217–224 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zhsVSluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8739736 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2007-1005431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. NM deSouza AS Hall R Puni DJ Gilderdale IR Young WA Kmiot (1996) ArticleTitleHigh resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter using a dedicated endoanal coil. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings Dis Colon Rectum 39 926–934 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02053993 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zivVWqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8756850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. NM deSouza R Puni DJ Gilderdale GM Bydder (1995) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter using an internal coil Magn Reson Q 11 45–56 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2Mzjs1yqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7612423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. E Rociu J Stoker AW Zwamborn JS Lameris (1999) ArticleTitleEndoanal MR imaging of the anal sphincter in fecal incontinence Radiographics 19 S171–S177 Occurrence Handle10517453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. AB Williams CI Bartram D Modhwadia et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEndocoil magnetic resonance imaging quantification of external anal sphincter atrophy Br J Surg 88 853–859 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01796.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzkvFWgtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11412258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. AB Williams AJ Malouf CI Bartram S Halligan MA Kamm WA Kmiot (2001) ArticleTitleAssessment of external anal sphincter morphology in idiopathic fecal incontinence with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging Dig Dis Sci 46 1466–1471 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010639920979 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvjtFansg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11478498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. E Rociu J Stoker MJ Eijkemans WR Schouten JS Lameris (1999) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence: endoanal US versus endoanal MR imaging Radiology 212 453–458 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzlvVegtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10429703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. NM deSouza R Puni A Zbar DJ Gilderale GA Coutts T Krausz (1996) ArticleTitleMR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous women using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearances in fecal incontinence AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 1465–1471 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s7hsFWktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8956578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. JW Briel DD Zimmerman J Stoker et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRelationship between sphincter morphology on endoanal MRI and histopathological aspects of the external anal sphincter Int J Colorectal Dis 15 87–90 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003840050238 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvntlWisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10855549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. JG Fletcher RF Busse SJ Riederer et al. (2003) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders Am J Gastroenterol 98 399–411 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07235.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FnvFenuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12591061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. CJ Vaizey E Carapeti JA Cahill MA Kamm (1999) ArticleTitleProspective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems Gut 44 77–80 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FotFKmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9862829 Occurrence Handle10.1136/gut.44.1.77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. EE Soffer T Hull (2000) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence: a practical approach to evaluation and treatment Am J Gastroenterol 95 1873–1880 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02237.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhs1aluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10950029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. ES Kiff M Swash (1984) ArticleTitleSlowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence Br J Surg 71 614–616 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2c3lvVejsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6743983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. MM Henry (1987) ArticleTitlePathogenesis and management of fecal incontinence in the adult Gastroenterol Clin North Am 16 35–45 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2s3kvFWgsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle3298054

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. PA Haas TA Fox SuffixJr (1980) ArticleTitleAge-related changes and scar formations of perianal connective tissue Dis Colon Rectum 23 160–169 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3c3gtFSrsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7379669

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. E Rociu J Stoker MJ Eijkemans JS Lameris (2000) ArticleTitleNormal anal sphincter anatomy and age- and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging Radiology 217 395–401 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtFeqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11058634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. H Damon L Henry X Barth F Mion (2002) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence in females with a past history of vaginal delivery: significance of anal sphincter defects detected by ultrasound Dis Colon Rectum 45 1445–1450 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6448-x Occurrence Handle12432289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. CM Nichols EJ Gill T Nguyen MD Barber WG Hurt (2004) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter injury in women with pelvic floor disorders Obstet Gynecol 104 690–696 Occurrence Handle15458887

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. F Voyvodic NA Rieger S Skinner et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEndosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury: does the size of the tear correlate with the degree of dysfunction? Dis Colon Rectum 46 735–741 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6650-x Occurrence Handle12794574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. M Lamah D Kumar (1999) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence Dig Dis Sci 44 2488–2499 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026643207180 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FpsVWquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10630503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank C. Lavini, M.Phil., for assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maaike P. Terra M.D..

Additional information

Supported by grant 945-01-013 of the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Terra, M.P., Deutekom, M., Beets-Tan, R.G.H. et al. Relationship Between External Anal Sphincter Atrophy at Endoanal Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical, Functional, and Anatomic Characteristics in Patients With Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 668–678 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0507-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0507-4

Key words

Navigation