Purpose
Small-volume bowel preparation is better tolerated than 4-liter polyethylene glycol lavage. However, the efficacy of various small-volume bowel preparation agents for colonoscopy has not been clearly defined. This randomized, controlled trial was designed to compare oral sodium phosphate (Fleet®) with Picoprep® (sodium picosulfate-based preparation).
Methods
Two hundred twenty-five outpatients, aged 65 years or younger, who would undergo colonoscopy by two endoscopists were randomized to receive two bottles of oral sodium phosphate or three sachets of Picoprep®. A standardized questionnaire was completed by all patients and the endoscopists. The endoscopists were blinded to the preparation used.
Results
One hundred three patients were randomized to oral sodium phosphate (Fleet®) (Group 1) and 122 patients to Picoprep® (Group 2). Three patients were excluded because of colonic strictures. The groups were similar in age and gender, indications for colonoscopy, and previous colonic surgery. The quality of bowel cleansing in patients taking oral sodium phosphate (Fleet®) was significantly better than Picoprep® as assessed by the endoscopists (P = 0.0014). Both types of bowel preparation were associated with similar incidence of nausea (P = 0.4927), dizziness (P= 0.9663), abdominal cramps (P = 0.7157), and patient acceptability (P = 0.0767). Equal majority from either group would use the same bowel preparation again (91 percent of oral sodium phosphate (Fleet®) and 93 percent of Picoprep®group; P = 0.6172). Although Picoprep® wasbetter tasting (P = 0.0273), oral sodium phosphate (Fleet®)was perceived to be a good preparation agent by a greater (although not significant) proportion of patients (P = 0.0853).
Conclusions
Oral sodium phosphate (Fleet®) is more effective in bowel cleansing than Picoprep®as a bowel preparation agent. Both agents have similar side effects and patient acceptance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SJ Vanner PH MacDonald WG Paterson RS Prentice LR Costa ParticleDa IT Beck (1990) ArticleTitleA randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) inthe preparation of patients for colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 85 422–427 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB38vptlc%3D Occurrence Handle2183591
SM Cohen SD Wexner SR Binderow et al. (1994) ArticleTitleProspective randomized endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods Dis Colon Rectum 37 689–696 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02054413 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB1MfktF0%3D Occurrence Handle8026236
D Frommer (1997) ArticleTitleCleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy Dis Colon Rectum 40 100–104 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02055690 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB38fgtFU%3D Occurrence Handle9102248
JM Church (1998) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy – timing is the key Dis Colon Rectum 41 1223–1225 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02258217 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fgt1CgsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9788383
AK Lai PC Kwok SW Man RS Lau SC Chan (1996) ArticleTitleA blinded clinical trial comparing conventional cleansing enema. Pico-salax and golytely for barium enema bowel preparation Clin Radiol 51 566–569 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0009-9260(96)80137-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA2MfktVU%3D Occurrence Handle8761394
JA Lawrance TF Massoud TS Creasy W Shatwell A Mason DJ Nolan (1994) ArticleTitleColonic preparation with Picolax: patient tolerance and approaches to fluid replacement Clin Radiol 49 35–37 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3s%2FltVM%3D Occurrence Handle8299330
K Yoshioka AB Connolly OA Ogunbiyi H Hasegawa DG Morton MR Keighley (2000) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of oral sodium phosphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy Dig Surg 17 66–70 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000018802 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXntFOnsbs%3D Occurrence Handle10720834
AJ Macleod KA Duncan RH Pearson RR Bleakney (1998) ArticleTitleA comparison of Fleet® Phospho-soda® with Picolax in the preparation of the colon for double contrast barium enema Clin Radiol 53 612–614 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhsFyguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9744590
L-M Schmidt P Williams D King D Perera (2004) ArticleTitlePicoprep-3® is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet®: arandomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations Dis Colon Rectum 47 238–248 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-003-0027-4 Occurrence Handle15043296
InstitutionalAuthorNameADRAC (2002) ArticleTitleElectrolyte disturbances with sodium picosulfate bowel cleansing products Aust Advers Drug React Bull 21 2
JJ Tjandra P Tagkalidis (2004) ArticleTitleCarbohydrate-electrolyte (E-Lyte) solution enhances bowel preparation with oral Fleet® Phospho-soda® Dis Colon Rectum 47 1181–1186 Occurrence Handle15164249
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Tjandra, J.J., Chan, M. & Tagkalidis, P.P. Oral Sodium Phosphate (Fleet®) is a Superior Colonoscopy Preparation to Picoprep®(Sodium Picosulfate-Based Preparation). Dis Colon Rectum 49, 616–620 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0323-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0323-2