Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Ligation Level of the Primary Feeding Artery and Bowel Resection Margin in Colon Cancer Surgery: The Influence of the Site of the Primary Feeding Artery

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

In colon cancer surgery, it is recommended that en bloc resection involving extended lymphadenectomy, characterized as a hemicolectomy, be performed by ligating the primary feeding artery at a high position and resecting proximal and distal with 5-cm to 10-cm bowel margins. However, there is little evidence to unequivocally support such extensive lymphovascular resection.

METHODS

The distribution of nodal metastases was obtained by the clearing method in 164 patients with colon cancer.

RESULTS

For pericolic spread, for pT1 tumors, the distance from the primary tumor to a diseased node was 2.5 cm; for pT2, the distance was less than 5 cm; for 97.0 percent of pT3 tumors and 93.3 percent of pT4 tumors with nodes involved, the distance was less than 7 cm. For central spread, for pT1 tumors, the rate of spread to central nodes was 0 percent; for pT2, the rate of spread was 20.0 percent to intermediate nodes (for tumors more than 5 cm from the feeding artery, the rate for central nodes was 0 percent); for pT3, the rate was 30.6 percent to intermediate nodes and 15.3 percent to main nodes; for pT4, the rate was 44.4 percent to intermediate nodes and 22.2 percent to main nodes. For curative resection cases with pT3 tumors more than 7 cm from the feeding artery, the rate to central nodes was 0 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

In T1 tumors, central node dissection is not required, but resection with proximal and distal 3-cm margins are required; in T2, central node dissection that includes the intermediate node should be performed in addition to resection with proximal and distal 5-cm margins. In T3 and T4, central node dissection that includes the main node should be performed in addition to resection with proximal and distal 7-cm margins. However, for T2 more than 5 cm from the primary feeding artery, and for T3 more than 7 cm from the primary feeding artery, proximal and distal resection alone may be adequate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. 5th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara, 1998:18–29

  2. H Nelson N Petrelli A Carlin et al. (2001) ArticleTitleGuidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery J Natl Cancer Inst 93 583–96 Occurrence Handle11309435 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/93.8.583 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hvFejtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J Hida N Mori R Kubo et al. (1994) ArticleTitleMetastases from carcinoma of the colon and rectum detected in small lymph nodes by the clearing method J Am Coll Surg 178 223–8 Occurrence Handle8149012 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c7pvFSmtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J Hida M Yasutomi T Maruyama K Fujimoto T Uchida K Okuno (1997) ArticleTitleThe extent of lymph node dissection for colon carcinoma: the potential impact on laparoscopic surgery Cancer 80 188–92 Occurrence Handle9217028 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970715)80:2<188::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO;2-Q Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szmtVSjsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch, eds. UICC TNM Classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002:72–6

  6. WE Enker UT Laffer GE Block (1979) ArticleTitleEnhanced survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer is based upon wide anatomic resection Ann Surg 190 350–60 Occurrence Handle485609 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-197909000-00010 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3c%2FhvFemsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. CE Dukes (1930) ArticleTitleThe spread of cancer of the rectum Br J Surg 17 643–8 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800176810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. HR Dorrance GM Docherty PJ O'Dwyer (2000) ArticleTitleEffect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery Dis Colon Rectum 43 492–8 Occurrence Handle10789744 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237192 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3kvVKjtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G Burdy Y Panis A Alves J Nemeth A Lavergne-Slove P Valleur (2001) ArticleTitleIdentifying patients with T3-T4 node-negative colon cancer at high risk of recurrence Dis Colon Rectum 44 1682–8 Occurrence Handle11711742 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234390 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnmsFKgtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. TE Read MG Mutch BW Chang et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLocoregional recurrence and survival after curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon J Am Coll Surg 195 33–40 Occurrence Handle12113543 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01224-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. F Rouffet JM Hay B Vacher et al. (1994) ArticleTitleCurative resection for left colonic carcinoma: hemicolectomy vs. segmental colectomy. A prospective, controlled, multicenter trial. French Association for Surgical Research Dis Colon Rectum 37 651–9 Occurrence Handle8026230 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02054407 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3pvVCisQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. PA Rosi WJ Cahill J Carey (1962) ArticleTitleA ten year study of hemicolectomy in the treatment of carcinoma of the left half of the colon Surg Gynecol Obstet 114 15–24 Occurrence Handle14494101 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaF38%2FpsFKktA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. HE Bacon JE Pezzutti WD Smith RR Gutierrez FM Diamante (1966) ArticleTitleA critical analysis of aortoiliopelvic lymphadenectomy and high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for carcinoma of the left colon and rectum Bull Soc Int Chir 25 114–21 Occurrence Handle5947748 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaF287ntlOjtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. CA Slanetz SuffixJr R Grimson (1997) ArticleTitleEffect of high and intermediate ligation on survival and recurrence rates following curative resection of colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 40 1205–19 Occurrence Handle9336116 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02055167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. RS Grinnell (1965) ArticleTitleResults of ligation of inferior mesenteric artery at the aorta in resections of carcinoma of the descending and sigmoid colon and rectum Surg Gynecol Obstet 120 1031–6 Occurrence Handle14269834 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaF2M%2FnsVeruw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M Prandi R Lionetto A Bini et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePrognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial Ann Surg 235 458–63 Occurrence Handle11923600 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200204000-00002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JW Fleshman SuffixJr (2002) ArticleTitleThe effect of the surgeon and the pathologist on patient survival after resection of colon and rectal cancer Ann Surg 235 464–5 Occurrence Handle11923601 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200204000-00003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. National Health and Medical Research Council. The prevention, early detection and management of colorectal caner. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/nhmrc/. March 1999; accessed 8 April 2003

  19. Lavery IC. Preoperative evaluation. In: Cohen AM, Winawer SJ, eds. Cancer of the colon, rectum, and anus. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995:425–9

  20. B Limberg (1992) ArticleTitleDiagnosis and staging of colonic tumors by conventional abdominal sonography as compared with hydrocolonic sonography N Engl J Med 327 65–9 Occurrence Handle1603137 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383ptlaksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199207093270201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. M Nomura S Izumi (2001) ArticleTitleEfficacy of high-frequency ultrasound probes for invasion-depth diagnosis of colorectal cancers Stomach and Intestine 36 805–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. F Ishikawa N Saito N Takiguchi K Oda H Sarashina (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the depth of invasion of colorectal cancers using endoscopic ultrasonography Early Colorectal Cancer 3 259–64

    Google Scholar 

  23. E Cho M Ueda (1998) ArticleTitleUse of three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography (3D-EUS) in the diagnosis of colorectal diseases Stomach and Intestine 33 153–60

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y Saitoh T Obara K Einami et al. (1996) ArticleTitleEfficacy of high-frequency ultrasound probes for the preoperative staging of invasion depth in flat and depressed colorectal tumors Gastrointest Endosc 44 34–9 Occurrence Handle8836714 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70226-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28vjtlOgtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-ichi Hida M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Hida, Ji., Okuno, K., Yasutomi, M. et al. Optimal Ligation Level of the Primary Feeding Artery and Bowel Resection Margin in Colon Cancer Surgery: The Influence of the Site of the Primary Feeding Artery. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 2232–2237 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0161-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0161-2

Key words

Navigation