PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcome of Orr–Loygue rectopexy and Delorme’s procedures in total rectal prolapse management.
METHODS
Data were collected retrospectively from 1978 to 2001. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-squared test and Student’s t -test.
RESULTS
One hundred nine patients underwent either a Orr–Loygue rectopexy (49 patients) or a Delorme’s procedure (60 patients). Mean follow-up was 88 (range, 1–300) months. In the rectopexy group, the overall complication rate and the recurrence rate were 33 percent and 4 percent, respectively. In patients with preoperative constipation, this symptom was improved or completely resolved in 33 percent and worsened in 58 percent postoperatively. Seventy-three percent of patients with preoperative incontinence were continent or had continence improvement postoperatively. In Delorme’s group, overall complication and recurrence rates were 15 percent and 23 percent, respectively. Mortality was 7 percent. In patients with preoperative constipation, this symtom was improved or completely resolved in 54 percent and worsened in 12.5 percent of patients postoperatively. Forty-two percent of patients with preoperative incontinence were continent or had continence improvement postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, Orr–Loygue rectopexy had a lower long-term recurrence rate. However, this surgical procedure is associated with a higher complication rate. We believe that Delorme’s procedure is still a valuable option in selected patients with postoperative minimal morbidity but higher recurrence rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
RD Madoff A Mellgren (1999) ArticleTitleOne hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery Dis Colon Rectum 42 441–50 Occurrence Handle10215042
AM Watts MR Thompson (2000) ArticleTitleEvaluation of Delorme’s procedure as a treatment for full thickness rectal prolapse Br J Surg 87 218–22 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01342.x Occurrence Handle10671931
R Douard P Frileux M Brunel E Attal E Tiret R Parc (2003) ArticleTitleFunctional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 46 1089–96 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7285-7 Occurrence Handle12907904
J Loygue B Nordlinger O Cunci M Malafosse C Huguet R Parc (1984) ArticleTitleRectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse: report of 257 cases Dis Colon Rectum 27 356–9 Occurrence Handle6376001
I Schultz A Mellgren A Dolk C Johansson B Holmstrom (2000) ArticleTitleLong-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy Dis Colon Rectum 43 35–43 Occurrence Handle10813121
BP Watkins J Landercasper GE Belzer et al. (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up of the modified Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse Arch Surg 138 498–502 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.138.5.498 Occurrence Handle12742952
A Tsunoda N Yasuda N Yokohama G Kamiyama M Kusano (2003) ArticleTitleDelorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Clinical and physiological analysis Dis Colon Rectum 46 1260–5 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6724-9 Occurrence Handle12972972
SA Tobin IH Scott (1994) ArticleTitleDelorme operation for rectal prolapse Br J Surg 81 1681–4 Occurrence Handle7827907
GC Oliver D Vachon TE Eisenstat RJ Rubin EP Salvati (1994) ArticleTitleDelorme’s procedure for complete rectal prolapse in severely debilitated patients: an analysis of 41 cases Dis Colon Rectum 37 461–7 Occurrence Handle8181408
JP Lechaux D Lechaux M Perez (1995) ArticleTitleResults of Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: advantages of a modified technique Dis Colon Rectum 38 301–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02055608 Occurrence Handle7882798
Keighley M, Madoff RD, Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Rectal prolapse. In: Henry MM, Swash M, eds. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992:316–50
I Sielezneff JC Bulgare B Sastre JC Sarles (1995) ArticleTitleResults of surgical treatment of exteriorized rectal prolapse in adults. Twenty-one years experience Ann Chir 49 396–402 Occurrence Handle7574350
D Gallot P Martel I Honigman X Chenard A Sezeur M Malafosse (2000) ArticleTitlePosterior Orr-Loygue rectopexy in rectal prolapse Ann Chir 125 40–4 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-3944(00)00288-1 Occurrence Handle10921183
A Senapati RJ Nicholls JP Thomson RK Phillips (1994) ArticleTitleResults of Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 37 456–60 Occurrence Handle8181407
SA Fengler RK Pearl ML Prasad et al. (1997) ArticleTitleManagement of recurrent rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 40 832–4 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02055442 Occurrence Handle9221862
GR Hool TL Hull VW Fazio (1997) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of recurrent complete rectal prolapse: a thirty-year experience Dis Colon Rectum 40 270–2 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02050414 Occurrence Handle9118739
AJ Pikarsky JS Joo SD Wexner et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRecurrent rectal prolapse: what is the next good option? Dis Colon Rectum 43 1273–6 Occurrence Handle11005496
KW Eu F Seow-Choen (1997) ArticleTitleFunctional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment Br J Surg 84 904–11 Occurrence Handle9240128
MV Kairaluoma MT Viljakka IH Kellokumpu (2003) ArticleTitleOpen vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome Dis Colon Rectum 46 353–60 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6555-8 Occurrence Handle12626911
S Benoist N Taffinder S Gould A Chang A Darzi (2001) ArticleTitleFunctional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy Am J Surg 182 168–73 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00672-9 Occurrence Handle11574090
MJ Solomon CJ Young AA Eyers RA Roberts (2002) ArticleTitleRandomized cliniocal trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse Br J Surg 89 35–9 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01957.x Occurrence Handle11851660
CT Speakman MV Madden RJ Nicholls MA Kamm (1991) ArticleTitleLateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study Br J Surg 78 1431–3 Occurrence Handle1773316
JB Delamarre HG Gooszen RH Kruyt R Soebhag A Maas Geesteranus (1991) ArticleTitleThe effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence: a prospective study Dis Colon Rectum 34 311–6 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02050590 Occurrence Handle2007348
RF McKee JC Lauder FW Poon MA Aitchinson IG Finlay (1992) ArticleTitleA prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse Surg Gyn Obstet 174 145–8
PT Aitola KM Hiltunen MJ Matikainen (1999) ArticleTitleFunctional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period: emphasis on transabdominal approach Dis Colon Rectum 42 655–60 Occurrence Handle10344689
DS Kim CB Tsang WD Wong AC Lowry SM Goldberg RD Madoff (1999) ArticleTitleComplete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results Dis Colon Rectum 42 460–6 Occurrence Handle10215045
SM Plusa JA Charig V Balaji AM Watts MR Thompson (1995) ArticleTitlePhysiological changes after Delorme’s procedure for full thickness rectal prolapse Br J Surg 82 1475–8 Occurrence Handle8535796
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Arnaud Verdier, M.D., Bassen Makar, M.D., and Jean Michel Tortuyaux, M.D. for their contribution to this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Marchal, F., Bresler, L., Ayav, A. et al. Long-Term Results of Delorme’s Procedure and Orr–Loygue Rectopexy to Treat Complete Rectal Prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 1785–1790 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0088-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0088-7