Abstract
PURPOSE: Microscopic mesorectal soft tissue extranodal deposits discontinuous with the primary tumor are identified in many rectal adenocarcinomas. Current guidelines consider them to be involved lymph nodes. We studied the impact of these deposits on the outcome of patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective study, in which histology slides were reviewed from 55 patients whose resection specimens for rectal cancer were staged as Dukes C or Dukes B with extranodal deposits. Twenty-nine patients had extranodal deposits (19 males), and 26 control patients had lymph node involvement only (14 males). Patient outcome was analyzed in terms of local and systemic control and survival. RESULTS: Distant metastases were diagnosed earlier in patients with extranodal deposits (mean, 14 months) compared with controls (mean, 37 months; P = 0.001). On follow-up, 31.03 percent (9/29) from the extranodal deposit group developed liver metastases compared with 11.5 percent (3/26) of the control group (P = 0.08). Local recurrence was seen in 17.2 percent of patients from the extranodal deposit group and 3.8 percent of the control group (P = not significant). Cancer-related mortality was higher in the extranodal deposit group (16 vs. 7 patients; P = 0.09). The three-year actuarial survival was 48.27 percent in patients with extranodal deposits and 65.38 percent in those without. A significant association was noted between the number of extranodal deposits and intramural vascular invasion (P = 0.017), extramural vascular invasion (P = 0.039), perineural invasion (P = 0.039), and lymph node involvement (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that extranodal deposit is a distinct form of metastatic disease in patients with rectal cancer. The association with vascular invasion and earlier development of metastases probably infers that a significant proportion of extranodal deposits may represent blood-borne spread. These tumor foci should be considered as indicators of poor prognosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T Hasebe M Morihiro S Sasaki et al. (2000) ArticleTitleTumor thickness is a histopathologic predictive parameter of tumor metastasis and prognosis in patients with Dukes stage C ulcerative-type colorectal carcinoma. A two-hospital-based study Cancer 89 35–45
T Rich LL Gunderson R Lew et al. (1983) ArticleTitlePatterns of recurrence of rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery Cancer 52 1317–1329
K Takahashi T Mori M Yasuno (2000) ArticleTitleHistologic grade of metastatic lymph node and prognosis of rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 43 40–46
MR Moran EC James DA Rothenberger SM Goldberg (1992) ArticleTitlePrognostic value of positive lymph nodes in rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 35 579–581
K Hojo Y Koyama Y Moriya (1982) ArticleTitleLymphatic spread and its prognostic value in patients with rectal cancer Am J Surg 144 350–354
M Pocard Y Panis B Malassagne J Nemeth P Hautefeuille P Valleur (1998) ArticleTitleAssessing the effectiveness of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 41 839–845
JE Tepper MJ O’Connell D Niedzwiecki et al. (2001) ArticleTitleImpact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer J Clin Oncol 19 157–163
H Ueno K Hase H Mochizuki (2001) ArticleTitleCriteria for extramural perineural invasion as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer Br J Surg 88 994–1000
J Camilleri-Brennan RJ Steele (2001) ArticleTitleThe impact of recurrent rectal cancer on quality of life Eur J Surg Oncol 27 349–353
P Hermanek PJ Hermanek (2000) ArticleTitleRole of the surgeon as a variable in the treatment of rectal cancer Semin Surg Oncol 19 329–335
P Quirke P Durdey MF Dixon NS Williams (1986) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumor spread and surgical excision Lancet 2 996–999
H Ueno H Mochizuki S Tamakuma (1998) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of extranodal microscopic foci discontinuous with primary lesion in rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 41 55–61
AK Singh RJ Myerson EH Birnbaum et al. (2000) ArticleTitleOutcome of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma and localized pelvic non-nodal metastatic foci Dis Colon Rectum 43 1217–1221
AL Polglase PJ McMurrick AB Tremayne PS Bhathal (2001) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence after curative anterior resection with principally blunt dissection for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid Dis Colon Rectum 44 947–954
PJ Borgstein S Meijer PJ van Diest (1999) ArticleTitleAre locoregional cutaneous metastases in melanoma predictable? Ann Surg Oncol 6 315–321
AC Buzaid MI Ross CM Balch et al. (1997) ArticleTitleCritical analysis of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma and proposal of a new staging system J Clin Oncol 15 1039–1051
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Prabhudesai, A., Arif,, S., Finlayson, C.J. et al. Impact of Microscopic Extranodal Tumor Deposits on the Outcome of Patients With Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 1531–1537 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6809-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6809-5