Skip to main content
Log in

Management and Treatment Outcome of Pouch-Vaginal Fistulas Following Restorative Proctocolectomy

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcome of surgical management of pouch-vaginal fistulas in females who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: This study was designed as a retrospective chart review of females treated for pouch-vaginal fistulas from 1983 to 2000. All patients were followed up using our prospective pouch registry, with additional data collected by interview or mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty females were identified (mean age, 33.3 ± 1.3 years), of whom 33 had their initial restorative proctocolectomy done at our institution. Preoperative diagnosis was ulcerative colitis (88 percent), indeterminate colitis (10 percent), and familial adenomatous polyposis (2 percent). Average time to pouch-vaginal fistula following restorative proctocolectomy was 21 months (range, 1–132 months). Postoperative pelvic sepsis had occurred in 17 (28 percent) patients. Primary treatment modalities included the following: local repairs (n = 46, 77 percent), the majority of which were ileal advancement flaps; redo restorative proctocolectomy (n = 6, 10 percent); and pouch excision (n = 5, 8 percent). Initial healing was achieved in 20 patients. An additional 11 patients with recurrences healed after repeat procedures. The overall healing rate was 52 percent at 49.4 ± 3.8 months follow-up. Pouch failure was the eventual outcome in 13 (22 percent) patients and 16 (27 percent) patients had persistent pouch-vaginal fistula. A delayed diagnosis of Crohn’s disease was made in 24 patients. Crohn’s disease patients had lower success rates following ileal advancement flaps compared with the non-Crohn’s group (25 vs. 48 percent, respectively), much lower overall healing rates of their pouch-vaginal fistulas (17 vs. 75 percent, respectively), and a higher incidence of pouch failure (33 vs. 14 percent, respectively). CONCLUSION: Pouch-vaginal fistulas are a difficult problem in females following restorative proctocolectomy. However, local repair can be successful with good functional outcomes. Redo restorative proctocolectomy may also achieve healing if local repairs are not possible or have failed. A delayed diagnosis of Crohn’s disease results in worse treatment outcome and higher pouch failure rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JH Pemberton SF Phillips RR Ready AR Zinsmeister OH Beahrs (1989) ArticleTitleQuality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Comparison of performance status Ann Surg 209 620–628

    Google Scholar 

  2. VW Fazio Y Ziv JM Church et al. (1995) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomoses Ann Surg 222 120–127

    Google Scholar 

  3. P Setti-Carraro JK Ritchie KH Wilkinson RJ Nicholls PR Hawley (1994) ArticleTitleThe first 10 years’ experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis Gut 35 1070–1075

    Google Scholar 

  4. P Belliveau J Trudel CA Vasilevsky B Stein PH Gordon (1999) ArticleTitleIleoanal anastomosis with reservoirs Can J Surg 42 345–352

    Google Scholar 

  5. HM MacRae RS McLeod Z Cohen BI O’Connor EN Ton (1997) ArticleTitleRisk factors for pelvic pouch failure Dis Colon Rectum 40 257–262

    Google Scholar 

  6. G Ozuner T Hull P Lee VW Fazio (1997) ArticleTitleWhat happens to a pelvic pouch when a fistula develops? Dis Colon Rectum 40 543–547

    Google Scholar 

  7. F Paye C Penna L Chiche E Tiret P Frileux R Parc (1996) ArticleTitlePouch-related fistula following restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 83 1574–1577

    Google Scholar 

  8. TJ O’Kelly M Merett NJ Mortensen TC Dehn M Kettlewell (1994) ArticleTitlePouch-vaginal fistula after restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 81 1374–1375

    Google Scholar 

  9. MR Keighley SP Grobler (1993) ArticleTitleFistula complicating restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 80 1065–1067

    Google Scholar 

  10. JS Groom RJ Nicholls PR Hawley RK Phillips (1993) ArticleTitlePouch-vaginal fistula following restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 80 936–940

    Google Scholar 

  11. PY Lee VW Fazio JM Church TL Hull KW Eu IC Lavery (1997) ArticleTitleVaginal fistula following restorative proctocolectomy Dis Colon Rectum 80 752–759

    Google Scholar 

  12. SD Wexner DA Rothenberger L Jensen et al. (1989) ArticleTitleIleal pouch vaginal fistulas Dis Colon Rectum 32 460–465

    Google Scholar 

  13. VW Fazio JJ Tjandra (1992) ArticleTitlePouch advancement and neoileoanal anastomosis for anastomotic stricture and anovaginal fistula complicating restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 79 696–697

    Google Scholar 

  14. AA Deutsch RS Mcleod J Cullen Z Cohen (1991) ArticleTitleResults of the pelvic-pouch procedure in patients with Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 34 475–477

    Google Scholar 

  15. IE Gecim BG Wolff JH Pemberton RM Devine RR Dozois (2000) ArticleTitleDoes technique of anastomosis play any role in developing late perianal abscess or fistula? Dis Colon Rectum 43 1241–1245

    Google Scholar 

  16. OA Ogunbiyi S Korsgen MR Keighley (1997) ArticleTitlePouch salvage Dis Colon Rectum 40 548–552

    Google Scholar 

  17. T Sonoda VW Fazio (2000) ArticleTitleControversies in the construction of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis Semin Gastrointest Dis 11 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  18. EM Breen DJ Schoetz SuffixJr PW Marcello et al. (1998) ArticleTitleFunctional results after perineal complications of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 41 691–695

    Google Scholar 

  19. D Burke CJ van Laarhoven F Herbst RJ Nicholls (2001) ArticleTitleTransvaginal repair of pouch-vaginal fistula Br J Surg 88 241–245

    Google Scholar 

  20. Z Cohen D Smith R McLeod (1998) ArticleTitleReconstructive surgery for pelvic pouches World J Surg 22 342–346

    Google Scholar 

  21. Y Panis B Poupard J Nemeth A Lavergne P Hautefeuille P Valleur (1996) ArticleTitleIleal pouch/anal anastomosis for Crohn’s disease Lancet 347 854–857

    Google Scholar 

  22. NM Hyman VW Fazio WB Tuckson IC Lavery (1991) ArticleTitleConsequences of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn’s colitis Dis Colon Rectum 34 653–657

    Google Scholar 

  23. H Kotangi K Kramer VW Fazio RE Petras (1991) ArticleTitleDo microscopic abnormalities at resection margins correlate with increased anastomotic recurrence in Crohn’s disease? Retrospective analysis of 100 cases Dis Colon Rectum 34 909–916

    Google Scholar 

  24. PM Sagar RR Dozios BG Wolff (1996) ArticleTitleLong-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 39 893–898

    Google Scholar 

  25. DH Present P Rutgeerts S Targan et al. (1999) ArticleTitleInfliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease N Engl J Med 340 1398–1405

    Google Scholar 

  26. R Lofberg (1999) ArticleTitleTreatment of fistulas in Crohn’s disease with infliximab Gut 45 642–643

    Google Scholar 

  27. E Ricart R Panaccione EV Loftus WJ Tremaine WJ Sandborn (1999) ArticleTitleSuccessful management of Crohn’s disease of the ileoanal pouch with infliximab Gastroenterology 117 429–432

    Google Scholar 

  28. CS Yu JH Pemberton D Larson (2000) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate colitis Dis Colon Rectum 43 1487–1496

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, N.S., Remzi, F., Massmann, A. et al. Management and Treatment Outcome of Pouch-Vaginal Fistulas Following Restorative Proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 911–917 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6684-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6684-0

Keywords

Navigation