Abstract
PURPOSE: Pouchitis is the most common complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Our previous study suggested that symptoms alone are not reliable for the diagnosis of pouchitis. The most commonly used diagnostic instrument is the 18-point pouchitis disease activity index consisting of three principal component scores: symptom, endoscopy, and histology. Despite its popularity, the pouchitis disease activity index has mainly been a research tool because of costs of endoscopy (especially with histology), complexity in calculation, and time delay in determining histology scores. It is not known whether pouch endoscopy without biopsy can reliably diagnose pouchitis in symptomatic patients. The aim of the present study was to determine whether omitting histologic evaluation from the pouchitis disease activity index significantly affects the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic criteria for pouchitis. METHODS: Ulcerative colitis patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and symptoms suggestive of pouchitis were evaluated. Patients with chronic refractory pouchitis and Crohn’s disease were excluded. Patients with pouchitis disease activity index scores of seven or more were diagnosed as having pouchitis. Different diagnostic criteria were compared on the basis of the pouchitis disease activity index component scores. Nonparametric receiver-operating-characteristic curves were used to measure proposed pouchitis scores’ diagnostic accuracy compared with diagnosis from the pouchitis disease activity index. The receiver-operating-characteristic area under the curve measured how much these diagnostic strategies differed from each other. RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive symptomatic patients were enrolled; 32 (55 percent) patients were diagnosed with pouchitis. With the use of the pouchitis disease activity index as a criterion standard, the use of only symptom and endoscopy scores (modified pouchitis disease activity index) produced an area under the curve of 0.995. Establishing a cut-point of five or more for diseased patients resulted in a sensitivity equal to 97 percent and specificity equal to 100 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis based on the modified pouchitis disease activity index offers similar sensitivity and specificity when compared with the pouchitis disease activity index for patients with acute or acute relapsing pouchitis. Omission of endoscopic biopsy and histology from the standard pouchitis disease activity index would simplify pouchitis diagnostic criteria, reduce the cost of diagnosis, and avoid delay associated with determining histology score, while providing equivalent sensitivity and specificity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WJ Sandborn (1994) ArticleTitlePouchitis following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Gastroenterology 107 1856–1860
G Zuccaro VW Fazio JM Church IC Lavery WB Ruderman RG Farmer (1989) ArticleTitlePouch ileitis Dig Dis Sci 34 1505–1510
VW Fazio Y Ziv JM Church et al. (1995) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomoses Ann Surg 222 120–127
WJ Sandborn WJ Tremaine KP Batts JH Pemberton S Phillips (1994) ArticleTitlePouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Mayo Clin Proc 69 409–415
AP Meagher R Farouk RR Dozois KA Kelly JH Pemberton (1998) ArticleTitleJ ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from chronic ulcerative colitis Br J Surg 85 800–803
B Shen JP Achkar BA Lashner et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEndoscopic and histologic evaluation together with symptom assessment are required to diagnose pouchitis Gastroenterology 121 261–267
B Shen JP Achkar BA Lashner et al. (2002) ArticleTitleIrritable pouch syndrome Am J Gastroenterol 97 972–977
PR O’connell DR Rankin LH Weiland KA Kelly (1986) ArticleTitleEnteric bacteriology, absorption, morphology and emptying after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Br J Surg 73 909–914
E Ricart R Panaccione EV Loftus WJ Tremaine WJ Sandborn (1999) ArticleTitleSuccessful management of Crohn’s disease of the ileoanal pouch with infliximab Gastroenterology 117 429–432
M Mignon C Stettler SF Phillips (1995) ArticleTitlePouchitis Dis Colon Rectum 38 100–103
WA Kmiot SR Hesslewood N Smith H Thompson LK Harding MR Keighley (1993) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the inflammatory infiltrate in pouchitis with 111In-labeled granulocytes Gastroenterology 104 981–988
RL Moskowitz NA Shepherd RJ Nicholls (1986) ArticleTitleAn assessment of inflammation in the reservoir after restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal ileal reservoir Int J Colorectal Dis 1 167–174
JH Pemberton (1993) ArticleTitleThe problem with pouchitis [editorial] Gastroenterology 104 1209–1211
NA Shepherd L Hulten GN Tytgat et al. (1989) ArticleTitleWorkshop Int J Colorect Dis 4 205–209
UA Heuschen F Autschbach EH Allemeyer et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up after ileoanal pouch procedure Dis Colon Rectum 44 487–499
B Shen JP Achkar BA Lashner et al. (2001) ArticleTitleA randomized trial of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole in treating acute pouchitis Inflamm Bowel Dis 7 301–305
D Moonka EE Furth RP MacDermott GR Lichtenstein (1998) ArticleTitlePouchitis associated with primary cytomegalovirus infection Am J Gastroenterol 93 264–266
G Di Febo M Miglioli A Lauri et al. (1990) ArticleTitleEndoscopic assessment of acute inflammation of the reservoir after restorative ileoanal anastomosis Gastrointest Endosc 36 6–9
BF Warren NA Shepherd (1992) ArticleTitleThe role of pathology in pelvic ileal reservoir surgery Int J Colorectal Dis 7 68–75
PR Pfau GR Lichtenstein (2000) ArticleTitleCytomegalovirus infection as a cause of ileoanal pouchitis [letter] Dis Colon Rectum 43 113–114
M Munoz-Juarez JH Pemberton WJ Sandborn WJ Tremaine RR Dozois (1999) ArticleTitleMisdiagnosis of specific cytomegalovirus infection of the ileoanal pouch as refractory idiopathic chronic pouchitis Dis Colon Rectum 42 117–120