Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally Invasive Sacral Neuromodulation Implant Technique

Modifications to the Conventional Procedure

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sacral neuromodulation is a novel treatment for selected urinary and bowel dysfunctions. A new method is described for electrode implantation, the “minimally invasive sacral neuromodulation implant technique.” METHODS: After the percutaneous nerve evaluation test, a small longitudinal incision (3 cm) is made, and a catheter cannula segment is inserted through the sacral foramen beside an insulated needle. The electrode is introduced into the catheter cannula, which is then removed and fixed to the sacrum by means of small anchors. The proximal part of the lead is tunneled into the subcutaneous tissue, reaching the pocket made to accommodate the neurostimulator. RESULTS: This procedure was performed in ten patients (5 male; mean age, 50.4 years). In four patients a single electrode was implanted, and in six patients two electrodes were implanted. The minimally invasive technique was significantly faster, saving a mean time of 20 minutes for each electrode. The incision made directly on the sacral foramen was significantly reduced (3 vs. 12 cm), avoiding the wide, blunt dissection of subcutaneous fat tissue. Application of the catheter cannula allowed the electrode to be introduced easily and correctly. The electrode anchors never failed: no cases of lead displacement or suboptimal position of the electrode occurred. A unilateral, sterile subcutaneous seroma occurred in one of the ten patients. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive sacral neuromodulation implant technique seems to be a safe procedure—making sacral neuromodulation implant easier, faster, and safer, in as much as complications could be potentially reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SW Siegel (1992) ArticleTitleManagement of voiding dysfunction with an implantable neuroprosthesis Urol Clin North Am 19 163–170

    Google Scholar 

  2. RA Schmidt U Jonas KA Oleson et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Study Group J Urol 162 352–357

    Google Scholar 

  3. P Bertapelle F Cappellano M Spinelli et al. (1999) ArticleTitleItalian experience in neuromodulation Eur Urol 35 70–357

    Google Scholar 

  4. JL Bosch J Groen (2000) ArticleTitleSacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence J Urol 163 1219–1222

    Google Scholar 

  5. M Spinelli P Bertapelle F Cappellano et al. (2001) ArticleTitleChronic sacral neuromodulation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms J Urol 166 541–545

    Google Scholar 

  6. U Jonas CJ Fowler MB Chancellor et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEfficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention J Urol 165 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  7. E Ganio C Ratto A Masin et al. (2001) ArticleTitleNeuromodulation for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 44 965–970

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Ratto, C., Morelli, U., Paparo, S. et al. Minimally Invasive Sacral Neuromodulation Implant Technique. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 414–417 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6565-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6565-6

Keywords

Navigation