Skip to main content
Log in

Internal Sphincterotomy With Hemorrhoidectomy Does Not Relieve Pain

A Prospective, Randomized Study

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pain after hemorrhoidectomy is universal. Several attempts have been made to reduce or alleviate the pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy. The origin of pain is undetermined. Current theories propose that the pain is mediated through the internal sphincter. This prospective, randomized study was performed to assess the degree of discomfort in patients with and without a sphincterotomy when performing a closed hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: Between December 1999 and September 2001, 42 patients (22 males), median age 52 (range, 30–80) years, who underwent excisional hemorrhoidectomy were randomly chosen to have an internal sphincterotomy in the base of the left lateral wound. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were available for the study. Parameters elicited in the study were pain, postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, impairment of continence by day and by night, and day the patient returned to work. There was no statistical difference in the postoperative pain in each of the two categories at four hours after surgery, after the first bowel movement, or four days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed no difference in the perception of pain after hemorrhoidectomy in patients who had an internal sphincterotomy compared with those who did not. Both groups were equally likely to have difficulty with control of gas and soiling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IT Khubchandani HD Trimpi JA Sheets (1972) ArticleTitleClosed hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia Surg Gyn Obstet 135 955–957

    Google Scholar 

  2. CP Gibbons EA Trowbridge JJ Bannister NW Read (1986) ArticleTitleRole of anal cushions in maintaining continence Lancet 1 886–888 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90990-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC2szns1I%3D Occurrence Handle2870357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. PH Lord (1972) ArticleTitleA new approach to haemorrhoids Prog Surg 10 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  4. DM De Roover AG Hoofwijk TJ van Vroonhoven (1989) ArticleTitleLateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of fourth degree haemorrhoids Br J Surg 76 1181–1183

    Google Scholar 

  5. M Allgower (1975) ArticleTitleConservative management of hemorrhoids. Part II Clin Gastroenterol 4 608–618

    Google Scholar 

  6. S Eisenhammer (1974) ArticleTitleInternal anal sphincterotomy plus free dilatation versus anal stretch with special criticism of the anal stretch procedure for hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 17 493–522

    Google Scholar 

  7. WP Mazier (1973) ArticleTitleEmergency hemorrhoidectomy—a worthwhile procedure Dis Colon Rectum 16 200–205

    Google Scholar 

  8. JB Hansen SJ Jorgensen (1975) ArticleTitleRadical emergency operation for prolapsed and strangulated haemorrhoids Acta Chir Scand 141 810–812

    Google Scholar 

  9. RJ Heald AM Gudgeon (1986) ArticleTitleLimited haemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of acute strangulated haemorrhoids Br J Surg 73 1002–812

    Google Scholar 

  10. F Abbasakoor M Nelson J Beynon B Patel ND Carr (1998) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography in patients with anorectal symptoms after haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 85 1522–1524 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00887.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. BD Hancock K Smith (1975) ArticleTitleThe internal sphincter and Lord’s procedure for haemorrhoids Br J Surg 632 833–836

    Google Scholar 

  12. BD Hancock (1976) ArticleTitleMeasurement of anal pressure and motility Gut 17 645–651

    Google Scholar 

  13. MG Read NW Read WG Haynes TC Donnelly AG Johnson (1982) ArticleTitleA prospective study of the effect of haemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and faecal continence Br J Surg 69 396–398

    Google Scholar 

  14. AF Leong MJ Husain F Seow-Choen HS Goh (1994) ArticleTitlePerforming internal sphincterotomy with other anorectal procedures Dis Colon Rectum 37 1130–1132

    Google Scholar 

  15. SK Asfar TH Juma T Ala-Edeen (1988) ArticleTitleHemorrhoidectomy and sphincterotomy Dis Colon Rectum 31 181–185

    Google Scholar 

  16. PE Mortensen J Olsen IK Pedersen J Christiansen (1987) ArticleTitleA randomized study on hemorrhoidectomy combined with anal dilatation Dis Colon Rectum 30 755–757

    Google Scholar 

  17. YH Ho F Seow-Choen JY Low M Tan AP Leong (1997) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial of trimebutine (anal sphincter relaxant) for pain after haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 84 377–379 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB3s3htlY%3D Occurrence Handle9117313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. V Mathai BC Ong YH Ho (1996) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy with haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 83 380–382 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2cnis1w%3D Occurrence Handle8665199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. WR Schouten TJ van Vroonhoven (1986) ArticleTitleLateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 29 869–872

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Khubchandani, I.T. Internal Sphincterotomy With Hemorrhoidectomy Does Not Relieve Pain. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 1452–1457 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6450-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6450-3

Keywords

Navigation