Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between the grade of anal sphincter rupture, anal sphincter defect, manometry variables, and anal incontinence. METHODS: A total of 132 females with first-time obstetric sphincter rupture were evaluated by transanal ultrasound, manometry, and scoring of bowel symptoms five months after delivery. RESULTS: Anal sphincter rupture and transanal ultrasound grade correlated with each other (rs = 0.427, P = 0.001). Both rupture and transanal ultrasound grade correlated with soiling grade (rs = 0.2, P = 0.03 for both), but in a multiple regression analysis, only transanal ultrasound grade was significant (P = 0.001) as an independent variable. Anal incontinence score correlated with all the manometry variables, but in a multiple regression analysis, only squeeze pressure was significant (P = 0.001, beta = −0.4) as an independent variable. Both anal sphincter rupture and transanal ultrasound grade were correlated with manometry variables, but only transanal ultrasound grade was significant as an independent variable after multiple regression analysis. The frequency of transanal ultrasound–verified extensive defect of anal sphincter was higher in rupture Grade 3B (25; 95 percent confidence interval, 12–38 percent) and Grade 4 (45; 95 percent confidence interval, 24–66 percent) than in Grade 3A (2.8; 95 percent confidence interval, −1 to −6.6 percent). CONCLUSION: Manometry variables are significantly lower in incontinent females than in continent females, and the Wexner incontinence score was correlated with manometry variables. Both anal sphincter rupture and transanal ultrasound grade correlated with soiling grade and with manometry variables, but in both cases only the transanal ultrasound grade was a significant independent variable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T Tetzschner M Sørensen OOslash Rasmussen J Christiansen (1995) ArticleTitlePudendal nerve damage increases the risk of fecal incontinence in women with anal sphincter rupture after childbirth Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74 434–440 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA38fktVA%3D Occurrence Handle7604686
CJ Walsh EF Moony GJ Upton RW Motson (1996) ArticleTitleIncidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair Br J Surg 83 218–221 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1996.02043.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2cnpslQ%3D Occurrence Handle8689168
SM Sørensen H Bondesen O Istre P Vilmann (1988) ArticleTitlePerineal rupture following vaginal delivery Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67 315–318 Occurrence Handle3176952
AR Goffeng B Andersch M Andersson I Berndtsson T Hulten (1998) ArticleTitleObjective methods cannot predict anal incontinence after primary repair of extensive anal tears Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77 439–443 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3lvV2jsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9598955
H Gjessing B Backe Y Sahlin (1998) ArticleTitleThird degree obstetric tears Acta Obstet Gynecol 77 736–740 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhtFagtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9740521
AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson CI Bartram (1994) ArticleTitleThird degree obstetric anal sphincter tears BMJ 308 887–891 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB38jlvVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8173367
M Sørensen T Tetzschner OOslash Rasmussen J Bjarnesen J Christiansen (1993) ArticleTitleSphincter rupture in childbirth Br J Surg 80 392–394 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB3s%2FktFc%3D Occurrence Handle8472162
YK Yang SD Wexner (1994) ArticleTitleAnal pressure vectography is of no apparent benefit for sphincter evaluation Int J Colorectal Dis 9 92–95 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA2c3nvFc%3D Occurrence Handle8064197
PL Roberts JA Coller DJ Schoetz SuffixJr MC Veidenheimer (1990) ArticleTitleManometric assessment of patients with obstetric injuries and fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 30 16–20
PJ Law CI Bartram (1989) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography Gastrointest Radiol 14 349–353 Occurrence Handle2680741
MB Nielsen JF Pedersen C Hauge OOslash Rasmussen J Christiansen (1991) ArticleTitleEndosonography of the anal sphincter. Findings in healthy volunteers AJR Am J Roentgenol 157 1199–1202 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D2MfksFw%3D Occurrence Handle1950865
AH Sultan MA Kamm CV Hudson JR Nicholl CI Bartram (1994) ArticleTitleEndosonography of the anal sphincter Clin Radiol 49 368–374
JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3crnsVw%3D Occurrence Handle8416784
T Tetzschner M Sørensen G Lose J Christiansen (1996) ArticleTitleAnal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103 1034–1040 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD3MjgvFY%3D Occurrence Handle8863705
K Haadem JA Dahlstrøm G Lingman (1990) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter function after delivery Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 35 7–13 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC1cvntVY%3D Occurrence Handle2311820
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Nazir, M., Carlsen, E., Jacobsen, A.F. et al. Is There Any Correlation Between Objective Anal Testing, Rupture Grade, and Bowel Symptoms After Primary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Rupture?. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 1325–1331 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6419-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6419-2