Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the lengths of proximally based and distally based gluteus maximus flaps created as for anal sphincter reconstruction in soft human cadavers. METHODS: Twelve soft cadavers were used in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. In each cadaver, a proximally based flap of the gluteus maximus muscle was performed on one side and a distally based flap on the other. All flaps were carefully dissected with neurovascular preservation by one surgeon. After the dissected flap was placed across the anus, the length of the flap that projected beyond the anus was measured. The differences between such lengths of both types of flaps were assessed by paired t-test. RESULTS: The average lengths of the parts that projected beyond the anus for proximally based and distally based flaps were 8.08 and 4.50 (standard deviation, 0.51 and 0.79) cm, respectively. The average difference was 3.58 (standard deviation, 0.51) cm, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Results showed that proximally based flaps were significantly longer than distally based flaps and that transposition and wrapping around the anus with proximally based flaps were always easily performed without tension. These findings support the use of unilateral proximally based gluteus maximus flaps instead of unilateral or bilateral distally based flaps in patients with anal incontinence. The location of the neurovascular pedicle of the gluteus maximus was consistent at 1 cm superior and lateral to ischial tuberosity. Knowledge of this landmark allows quick and safe dissection of the gluteus maximus flap.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
PJ Guelinckx NK Sinsel JA Gruwez (1996) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter reconstruction with the gluteus maximus muscle Plast Reconstr Surg 98 293–302
JM Devesa JM Madrid BR Gallego E Vincente J Nuno JM Enriquez (1997) ArticleTitleBilateral gluteoplasty for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 40 883–888
VR Hentz (1982) ArticleTitleConstruction of a rectal sphincter using the origin of the gluteus maximus muscle Plast Reconstr Surg 70 82–85
RD Madoff HR Rosen CG Baeten et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSafety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence Gastroenterology 116 549–556
JJ Meehan WD Hardin KE Georgeson (1997) ArticleTitleGluteus maximus augmentation for the treatment of fecal incontinence J Pediatr Surg 32 1045–1048
J Christensen CR Hansen O Rasmussen (1995) ArticleTitleBilateral gluteus maximus transposition for anal incontinence Br J Surg 82 903–905
RK Pearl ML Prasad RL Nelson CP Orsay H Abcarian (1991) ArticleTitleBilateral gluteus maximus transposition for anal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 34 478–481
HA Bruining KE Bos EG Colthoff DE Tolhurst (1981) ArticleTitleCreation of an anal sphincter mechanism by bilateral proximally based gluteal muscle transposition Plast Reconstr Surg 67 70–72
MG Orgel JO Kucan (1985) ArticleTitleA double-split gluteus maximus muscle flap for reconstruction of the rectal sphincter Plast Reconstr Surg 75 62–66
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Pak-art, R., Silapunt, P., Bunaprasert, T. et al. Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Proximally Based vs. Distally Based Gluteus Maximus Flap for Anal Incontinence in Cadavers. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 1100–1103 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6367-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6367-x