Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the relationship of anal endosonography and manometry to anorectal complaints in the evaluation of females a long time after vaginal delivery complicated by anal sphincter damage. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with anal sphincter damage after delivery, 22 with and 12 without anorectal complaints, and 12 controls without anorectal complaints underwent anal endosonography, manometry, and rectal sensitivity testing. Complaints were assessed by questionnaire, with a median follow-up of 19 years. RESULTS: Median maximum anal resting pressures were significantly lower in patients with anal sphincter damage with complaints (31 mmHg) than in controls (52 mmHg; P < 0.001). Median maximum anal squeeze pressures were significantly lower in patients with (55 mmHg) and without (69 mmHg) complaints than in controls (112 mmHg; P < 0.001 for both). Maximum anal resting pressures were significantly lower in patients with anorectal complaints after anal sphincter damage than in patients without complaints (P = 0.02). Results of anal manometry showed a large overlap between all groups. Rectal sensitivity showed no significant differences between the three groups. Persisting sphincter defects, shown by anal endosonography, were significantly more present in patients with anal sphincter damage after delivery with (86 percent) and without (67 percent) complaints than in controls (8 percent; P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). No differences in the number of echocardiographically proven sphincter defects were found between patients with or without anorectal complaints after anal sphincter damage CONCLUSIONS: Echographically proven sphincter defects are strongly associated with a history of anal sphincter damage during delivery. Sphincter defects are present in the majority of patients with anorectal complaints. Anal manometry provides little additional therapeutic information when performed after anal endosonography in patients with anorectal complaints after anal sphincter damage during delivery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
JF Johanson J Lafferty (1996) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of fecal incontinence Am J Gastroenterol 91 33–36
R Nelson N Norton E Cautley S Furner (1995) ArticleTitleCommunity-based prevalence of anal incontinence JAMA 274 559–561
RO Roberts SJ Jacobsen WT Reilly JH Pemberton MM Lieber NJ Talley (1999) ArticleTitlePrevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence J Am Geriatr Soc 47 837–841
MA Kamm (1994) ArticleTitleObstetric damage and fecal incontinence Lancet 344 730–733
C MacArthur DE Bick MR Keighley (1997) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence after childbirth Br J Obstet Gynecol 104 46–50
C Chaliha AH Sultan SL Stanton (1999) ArticleTitleChanges in the pelvic floor following childbirth Fetal Matern Med Rev 11 41–54
RJ Felt-Bersma MA Cuesta M Koorevaar et al. (1992) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography Dis Colon Rectum 35 944–949
SS Rao RS Patel (1997) ArticleTitleHow useful are manometric tests of anorectal function in the management of defecation disorders? Am J Gastroenterol 92 469–475
SM Sentovich GJ Blatchford LJ Rivela K Lin AG Thorson MA Christensen (1997) ArticleTitleDiagnosing anal sphincter injury with transanal ultrasound and manometry Dis Colon Rectum 40 1430–1434
AH Sultan MA Kamm IC Talbot RJ Nicholls CI Bartram (1994) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically Br J Surg 81 463–465
K Haadem JA Dahlstrom G Lingman (1990) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter function after delivery Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 35 7–13
MB Nielsen C Hauge OOslash Rasmussen JF Pedersen J Christiansen (1992) ArticleTitleAnal endosonographic findings in the follow-up of primarily sutured sphincteric ruptures Br J Surg 79 104–106
M Sørensen T Tetzschner OOslash Rasmusssen J Bjarnesen J Christiansen (1993) ArticleTitleSphincter rupture in childbirth Br J Surg 80 392–394
AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson CI Bartram (1994) ArticleTitleThird degree obstetric anal sphincter tears BMJ 308 887–891
AC Poen RJ Felt-Bersma RL Strijers GA Dekker MA Cuesta SG Meuwissen (1998) ArticleTitleThird-degree obstetric perineal tear Br J Surg 85 1433–1438
T Tetzschner M Sørensen OOslash Rasmussen G Lose J Christansen (1995) ArticleTitlePudendal nerve damage increases the risk of fecal incontinence in women with anal sphincter rupture after childbirth Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74 434–440
AR Goffeng B Andersch M Andersson I Berndtsson L Hulten T Öresland (1998) ArticleTitleObjective methods cannot predict anal incontinence after primary repair of extensive anal tears Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77 439–443
H Gjessing B Backe Y Sahlin (1998) ArticleTitleThird degree obstetric tears Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77 736–740
TA Cook NJ Mortensen (1998) ArticleTitleManagement of fecal incontinence following obstetric injury Br J Surg 85 293–299
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
de Leeuw, JW., Vierhout, M.E., Struijk, P.C. et al. Anal Sphincter Damage After Vaginal Delivery. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 1004–1010 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6351-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6351-5